[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Alexandru David Constantinescu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru David Constantinescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:20 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTEC
Hello!
I downloaded and installed apache_2.2.9 on WinXP and It worked
fine.Then I downloaded php-5.2.6-Win32.zip and extracted it's contents to
c:\php folder.
I renamed the php.ini-dist to php.ini and saved it in the directory
WINDOWS But left the php.ini-dist at php folder, copied php
Seems the Apache docs are not quite correct in this area:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#directory
Says: "Note that the default Apache access for is Allow from All. This
means that Apache will serve any file mapped from an URL."
Well, there was a section in the main config fil
Greetings-
We are going through a migration from 2.0.54 to 2.2.9 per the request of the
developer of a mod we require support for.
On the old server, we had enabled multi-site capabilities. So I enabled the
following line in the 2.2.9 config file:
# Virtual hosts
Include conf/extra/httpd-vhos
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Alexandru David Constantinescu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Alexandru David Constantinescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:20 AM
>>> To: users@httpd.apache.org
>>> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] har
I received the following Error today after following the installation guide
word for word and was wondering if someone could help me?
"httpd.exe: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain
name, using (address) for ServerName Only one usage of each
socket address is normall
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:54 PM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just a guess :
>
> 1) the new entry you have added to /etc/apache2/sites-available (and
> sites-enabled) is called e.g. "darcs", which for some reason precedes
> "default" in the directory.
> 2) in the apache.conf, there i
Zach Uram wrote:
This is really baffling because CGI was working last week and now when
I try it again and it is not working.
All I did was add a name based virtual host in
/etc/apache2/sites-enabled/ and /etc/apache2/sites-available/
I am running apache2-mpm-prefork version 2.2.9-7 on Debian
This is really baffling because CGI was working last week and now when
I try it again and it is not working.
All I did was add a name based virtual host in
/etc/apache2/sites-enabled/ and /etc/apache2/sites-available/
I am running apache2-mpm-prefork version 2.2.9-7 on Debian lenny/sid.
/usr/li
Jay Jesus Amorin wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone help me on apache best practice?
What is the recommended permission of the DocumentRoot?
What is the recommended permission on the files and directories within
the DocumentRoot?
BTW my application is running on LAMP.
Current permission settings:
600 fo
Hello,
We have an existing intranet web application running on Tomcat 6.0 (on port
8080). Now, we installed Apache 2.0.61 (running on port 80) and installed
mod_jk connector that will forward the requests to Tomcat. The OS is Solaris
10.
Our application uses lot of Javascript and it appends param
Ben Spencer wrote:
Ther is no SSL involve what so ever.
The sites are very active (it is a share hosting environment and this
is
the reason why I wanna try the proxy) and beside that we plan to
expand.
We have between 50~300 reqs/sec (depend on time of the day) with around
10~20 kb/reqs and this
> Ther is no SSL involve what so ever.
> The sites are very active (it is a share hosting environment and this
> is
> the reason why I wanna try the proxy) and beside that we plan to
> expand.
> We have between 50~300 reqs/sec (depend on time of the day) with around
> 10~20 kb/reqs and this is not
Ben Spencer wrote:
How active are the sites? How complicated is the "proxy" configuration? Are
the Proxies an SSL termination point?
Server uptime: 50 days 3 hours 56 minutes 39 seconds
Total accesses: 36316506 - Total Traffic: 1544.5 GB
CPU Usage: u468.16 s2336.35 cu0 cs0 - .0647% CPU load
8.38
How active are the sites? How complicated is the "proxy" configuration? Are
the Proxies an SSL termination point?
Server uptime: 50 days 3 hours 56 minutes 39 seconds
Total accesses: 36316506 - Total Traffic: 1544.5 GB
CPU Usage: u468.16 s2336.35 cu0 cs0 - .0647% CPU load
8.38 requests/sec - 373.7
Hi all,
I'm working on a heartbeat project with 2 apaches servers.
My Apaches are using the following modules :
mod_ssl.so
mod_rewrite.so
mod_unique_id.so
mod_security2.so
mod_jk.so
When I start heartbeat (it's works fine, my virtual IP is mounted) I
have the following messages which are floo
Evert Lammerts wrote:
Why would you start out with implementing a single point of failure?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Alexandru David Constantinescu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello to all
I plan to implement a proxy server for apache. The idea is to act like a
firewall, proxy , load bal
Why would you start out with implementing a single point of failure?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Alexandru David Constantinescu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello to all
>
> I plan to implement a proxy server for apache. The idea is to act like a
> firewall, proxy , load balancer and cache. I
Hello to all
I plan to implement a proxy server for apache. The idea is to act like a
firewall, proxy , load balancer and cache. It must serve around 2000
sites. The backend servers I don't know for now how many will be, but I
am prepare to start with 2 or 3 and in case of heavy load , increase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Have come across a security issue and one of the reason is Apache allowing
serving of request with incorrect HOST header.
Question in short:
Is there an Apache Directive which will reject request with incorrect or
missing HOST header ? I mean if my Apache is
20 matches
Mail list logo
