[EMAIL PROTECTED] 404 on UserDir

2007-06-14 Thread Jay Chandler
Trying to get UserDir working on Apache2.2 under FreeBSD. Error log shows: File does not exist: /www/htdocs/~chandler httpd-userdir.conf: (copied from a working 2.0 server) UserDir public_html UserDir disabled root toor daemon operator bin tty kmem games news man sshd bind proxy _pflogd _dhcp

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can I put an Apache proxy in front of an XML-RPC server?

2007-06-14 Thread Krist van Besien
On 6/13/07, Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The proxy works just fine for the regular web server, but returns 404 for all requests. I've verified that the XML-RPC server is up and operating. If you're seeing 404 errors the first thing you should do is check your error log. If you're

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monitoring apache's mod_proxy_balancer

2007-06-14 Thread Tom Haddon
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 14:12 -0600, Serge Dubrouski wrote: > On 6/14/07, Tom Haddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 13:02 -0600, Serge Dubrouski wrote: > > > I wouldn't rely on balancer_manager for a such monitoring because I've > > > seen situations when it reported "Ok" status

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monitoring apache's mod_proxy_balancer

2007-06-14 Thread Serge Dubrouski
On 6/14/07, Tom Haddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 13:02 -0600, Serge Dubrouski wrote: > I wouldn't rely on balancer_manager for a such monitoring because I've > seen situations when it reported "Ok" status for workers that were > down. Is that a known bug? I haven't seen

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monitoring apache's mod_proxy_balancer

2007-06-14 Thread Tom Haddon
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 13:02 -0600, Serge Dubrouski wrote: > I wouldn't rely on balancer_manager for a such monitoring because I've > seen situations when it reported "Ok" status for workers that were > down. Is that a known bug? > > As alternative method you can use sniffing Apache error_log fi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monitoring apache's mod_proxy_balancer

2007-06-14 Thread Serge Dubrouski
I wouldn't rely on balancer_manager for a such monitoring because I've seen situations when it reported "Ok" status for workers that were down. As alternative method you can use sniffing Apache error_log file for the messages about disabled workers. You can OSSEC for that for example. On 6/14/07

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Monitoring apache's mod_proxy_balancer

2007-06-14 Thread Tom Haddon
Hi Folks, We've recently set up mod_proxy_balancer as a replacement for Pound, and I'm trying to work out the best way to monitor the load balancer to determine which servers are "in the loop" and which servers are "out of the loop". I'd ideally like to tie this in to Nagios so that I can get aler

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Strange Operation : Redirect HTTPS to HTTP

2007-06-14 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/14/07, Farid Izem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, The explanation you gave is ok for me. But what about the following modules : mod_ssl_error : http://marcstern.tripod.com/mod_ssl_error/ This could trap the certificates errors and solve the problem. I've never tried this module, but I d

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Strange Operation : Redirect HTTPS to HTTP

2007-06-14 Thread Farid Izem
Hi, The explanation you gave is ok for me. But what about the following modules : mod_ssl_error : http://marcstern.tripod.com/mod_ssl_error/ This could trap the certificates errors and solve the problem. Is there a way that this modules will be integrated in mod_ssl one day ? Kind Regards, F

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Invalid URI in request

2007-06-14 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/13/07, Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is a URI on my website for which I get: Invalid URI in request GET /hr/jobs HTTP/1.1 every single time the URI is accessed. The URI works as desired, returning the document as desired, and the end-user is never aware that anything untoward

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Thread Creation/Destroy Problem

2007-06-14 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/13/07, Croteau, Beau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm running the following code inside of an apache module: I think you'd have better luck on the apache module developers list: http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html#modules-dev Joshua. -

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't view SSL-enabled pages using Firefox

2007-06-14 Thread Salcedo, Simon
Sander, I have not shared my configuration because I did not change any of the default settings. All I changed were related to the certificate file and certificate key file (plus the server name and listen parameters). I did not see a need to do this, as my SSL-enabled site can be accessed using

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't view SSL-enabled pages using Firefox

2007-06-14 Thread Kevin P. Inscoe
Sorry for top posting but I am coming in late to this discussion. I once had a problem like this in Firefox with Apache 2.0.x using Verisign chained certificates. See if you need to update your intermediate ca. https://www.verisign.com/support/ssl-certificates-support/page_dev028341.html#010

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't view SSL-enabled pages using Firefox

2007-06-14 Thread Sander Temme
On Jun 14, 2007, at 7:21 AM, Salcedo, Simon wrote: Yes, I understand what I am requested to do. You also haven't volunteered your configuration, so we're kind of shooting in the dark. The cipher mismatch error message suggests that you have customized that setting (SSLCipherSuite) so tha

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't view SSL-enabled pages using Firefox

2007-06-14 Thread Salcedo, Simon
Yes, I understand what I am requested to do. Regards, Simon -Original Message- From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 8:27 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't view SSL-enabled pages using Firefox > -Original Message-

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't view SSL-enabled pages using Firefox

2007-06-14 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: Salcedo, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 3:12 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't view SSL-enabled pages using Firefox > > OK. I will do what Graeme and Sander suggest, but I am not sure why >

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't view SSL-enabled pages using Firefox

2007-06-14 Thread Salcedo, Simon
OK. I will do what Graeme and Sander suggest, but I am not sure why this will help solve the problem. As many of you have pointed out, SSL-enabling a site usually does not cause any browsing problems when using Firefox. Another reason is that I searched the Internet (google search on the error

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't view SSL-enabled pages using Firefox

2007-06-14 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 07:09 -0500, Salcedo, Simon wrote: > I disagree that the problem lies on the Client side because I have been > to sites that have identical certificates as I was using and still > browse those sites. I tend to believe that the problem is on the server > side. Which is why Sa

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't view SSL-enabled pages using Firefox

2007-06-14 Thread Salcedo, Simon
Sander, I disagree that the problem lies on the Client side because I have been to sites that have identical certificates as I was using and still browse those sites. I tend to believe that the problem is on the server side. Regards, Simon -Original Message- From: Sander Temme [mailto

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can mod_proxy_html rewrite

2007-06-14 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:50:15 -0700 (PDT) Earl Chew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Downloaded and installed 3.0 version 84. Dropped in as a replacement > with no change in directives (except to Include proxy_html.conf > unchanged) I get seg fault exits from apache children. > > What can I do to get

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to check if user-module(DSO) is loaded?

2007-06-14 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: janmejay.tripathi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 9:00 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to check if user-module(DSO) is loaded? > > Hi there, > > > > A newbie question. > > > > How can I ensure