AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with apache2 as a reverse proxy and OWA

Hi, I removed proxy_connect and proxy_ftp from my config file. Also I delete ProxyVia from my virtual host definition file. The switch ProxyPreserveHost was set to on. I reload apache2 but again I have the same problem, that I can see only a part from the OWA client. Maybe it has something to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

On 10/19/06, Bill Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In my Windows 2k environment, there was no way I could manage to get Apache 2 (any version) to listen to port 443 and serve SSL to multiple name-based hosts or even to multiple ip based hosts. Then you did something wrong. Because it is legal

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't get mod_dumpio to work

Hello, I've just downloaded & compiled the latest stable release of the 2.2.3 apache server, because I wanted to be able to use mod_dumpio to help debug my web app. It took me a good 2 hours to get everything running again (I was upgrading from apache 2.0.something). Anyway, after all, I hav

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No response recieved from Apache at some external locations, but not others

Just wanted to confirm this was pretty much it; it wasn't actually my fault, it was Windows Server 2003 defaulting to MTU of 1500. And I connect via PPPoA, not PPPoE. But nevertheless, a call to my ISP revealed that they like an MTU of 1458, so I set that on the router and as the MTU for the netw

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

Couldn't be installed a virtual interface instead of a real second network card, and use it for another SSL virtualhost? Teddy - Original Message - From: "Boyle Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:16 PM Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

Hi Gregor, the following config info may be of some use. I have my win2k server running Apache 2.2.3, ssl, etc using port 80 and port 443. The following configuration setup enables me to have multiple vhost on port 80 and multiple vhosts on port 443 and I can require login/password or not f

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

Hi Bill, This might be helpfull. I have this working on a win2k server. The following configuration setup enables me to have multiple vhost on port 80 and multiple vhosts on port 443 and I can require login/password or not for either port 80 or port 443. Hope this is useful. digger920 Apa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

OK, I will try this tomorrow (been a long day here in Europe) and if I hopefully succeed, I'll post the working configs so that other can participate. Thanks again & good night! Greg -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game ---

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can I force mod-cache to cache tomcat-generated pages with Pragma:no-cache?

Hi Vitaly, I don't know about mod_cache, but we're having a similar configuration here (Apache in front, Tomcat serving behind). We experienced that Apache doesn't "touch" any headers when they are served from Tomcat. Unfortunately. there is no option within Tomcat to declare http-headers in the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

On 10/19/06, Gregor Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua, I really have to thank you for this, somehow I really must have misunderstood the doc completely. If I read all the posts regarding SSL in this (and the other post): Do I assume correctly that - I can set up test-clue:443 and te

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

Joshua, I really have to thank you for this, somehow I really must have misunderstood the doc completely. If I read all the posts regarding SSL in this (and the other post): Do I assume correctly that - I can set up test-clue:443 and test-ltc:443 in the same way, provided - they are using the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

On 10/19/06, Gregor Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So what point am I missing here? Does there alway have to be a ServerName specified OUTSIDE the -spec? In your case, all requests are served by a , so the "main server" ServerName does absolutely nothing. But it is difficult for apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

Great, that made it, but I'd also like to understand what happend. The docs say: ServerName Directive Description:Hostname and port that the server uses to identify itself Syntax:ServerName [scheme://]fully-qualified-domain-name[:port] Context:server config, virtual host Status:Core Module:core

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

On 10/19/06, Gregor Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, maybe now I'm getting what you mean: I kept the configs as they are, but changed my apache2.conf to NameVirtualHost test-dom:80 NameVirtualHost test-dom:443 At least we are getting closer now. But those two lines should be NameVirt

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

Sorry, had a typo:In my apache2.config, I changed it toNameVirtualHost *:80NameVirtualHost *:443Still the error occursGreg-- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

Ok, maybe now I'm getting what you mean:I kept the configs as they are, but changed my apache2.conf toNameVirtualHost test-dom:80NameVirtualHost test-dom:443and I've changed my VHosts all the (abbreviated)     ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]    ServerName test-dom    ServerAdmin [EMAI

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WinXP apache config

Jayabalan_Aaron wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Im running Apache/1.3.34 (Win32) PHP/5.1.6 on winXP. Oh, so sorry to hear that. God bless and god speed to you. > Accessing pages i develop is possible from localhost, but when i > move on to another machine on my intranet.And try to view the websi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

On 10/19/06, Gregor Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/19/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's fine. But then you should post your best attempt at the proper > config. Not some garbage you are guessing at that has no resemblance > at all to the docs that you say you read

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

Joshua.On 10/19/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's fine.  But then you should post your best attempt at the properconfig.  Not some garbage you are guessing at that has no resemblanceat all to the docs that you say you read.  (I can't imagine how youcould have read those docs and co

[EMAIL PROTECTED] How can I force mod-cache to cache tomcat-generated pages with Pragma:no-cache?

Good day! I have jetspeed 2 portal that runs over tomcat 5.5.20. I have mod-rewrite module in front of tomcat. So, users of my portal enters in browser user-friendly urls like 'http://news.mycompany.net/xxx.html' I want to cache all pages of my portal with 2 minutes expiration, because content o

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

On 10/19/06, Bill Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In my Windows 2k environment, there was no way I could manage to get Apache 2 (any version) to listen to port 443 and serve SSL to multiple name-based hosts or even to multiple ip based hosts. Multiple named hosts work beautifully for me for N

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

In my Windows 2k environment, there was no way I could manage to get Apache 2 (any version) to listen to port 443 and serve SSL to multiple name-based hosts or even to multiple ip based hosts.   Multiple named hosts work beautifully for me for NON-SSL http service. But I could not manage to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

On 10/19/06, Gregor Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi owen, On 10/19/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The question is usually asked by people who haven't thought long enough > about why they want to use SSL. They think because it's encrypted on the > wire, that's already pretty

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

On 10/19/06, Bill Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My solution (ugly as you say), was to set up another instance of apache for my SSL server on port 443. I suppose if I needed another secure server, I would use another port and another instance of apache, or I would put the server on port 443 on

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

On 10/19/06, Gregor Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua, I really do appreciate your effort in this list and your support, however: I've tried that, I read the docs you mentioned, I tried it also with NameVirtualHost*:80 and NameVirtualHost *:443, all to no avail. That's fine. But th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

Hi Gregor: I found I could make a configuration file that allowed any number of virtual hosts on port 80 ... using 1 server instance   BUT I could only serve SSL for one host per instance of apache.   My solution (ugly as you say), was to set up another instance of apache for my SSL server

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

Joshua,I really do appreciate your effort in this list and your support, however:I've tried that, I read the docs you mentioned, I tried it also with NameVirtualHost*:80 and NameVirtualHost *:443, all to no avail. See, in the end I'm developing J2EE-wepapps, that's my job, but I'm far from being a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

On 10/19/06, Gregor Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: However, I wanted to set up a test-server in our company for development. Unfortunately, I'm not able to assign different IPs to it. Therefore, I wanted to create several NameBased VHosts for the same IP, all using the same cert. I wouldn't

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] korean characters in httpd.conf

Joshua,Thanks, changing AddDefaultCharset to "Off" worked perfectly.All the best,joonOn 10/19/06, Joshua Slive < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On 10/19/06, joon yoo < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hello,>> For apache 2.0.46 on a centos 4 box.>> How do I get korean character support working in apache?> > in

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

Hi owen,On 10/19/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The question is usually asked by people who haven't thought long enoughabout why they want to use SSL. They think because it's encrypted on thewire, that's already pretty good and having a valid cert is just a bureaucratic bonus.nope, that

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] korean characters in httpd.conf

On 10/19/06, joon yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, For apache 2.0.46 on a centos 4 box. How do I get korean character support working in apache? in my httpd.conf these lines are uncommented: AddCharset ISO-2022-KR .iso2022-kr .kis AddCharset ISO-2022-CN .iso2022-cn .cis AddCharset Big5

[EMAIL PROTECTED] korean characters in httpd.conf

Hello,For apache 2.0.46 on a centos 4 box.How do I get korean character support working in apache?in my httpd.conf these lines are uncommented:AddCharset ISO-2022-KR .iso2022-kr .kisAddCharset ISO-2022-CN .iso2022-cn .cis AddCharset Big5        .Big5       .big5but pages that have korean characters

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

> -Original Message- > From: joe pond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 4:31 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443 > > You'r right Boyle, it doesn't work. Looks like the best you > can do is to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost + SSL certificate problem

I need to serve many domains (designasign.biz, designateeshirt.biz, shopzeus.com, mess.hu etc.) I only have one IP address, so I'm using name based virtual hosts. However, I also need to do secure payments on two sites. I did a trick: It's called port-based virtual hosting - perfectly

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

You'r right Boyle, it doesn't work. Looks like the best you can do is to import the 1st certificate and trust that on the second host. Channel does come up locked but as has been asked by others "how secure is the channel without a fully valid crt." From: "Boyle Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> R

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost + SSL certificate problem

Joshua Slive wrote: On 10/19/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Move all the SSL certificate directives for this site in here, then it should work. As soon as you start using virtual hosts, give up the idea of a "default server" and put all directives in a VH container for each server

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost + SSL certificate problem

On 10/19/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Move all the SSL certificate directives for this site in here, then it should work. As soon as you start using virtual hosts, give up the idea of a "default server" and put all directives in a VH container for each server... That might be t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirection to www

On 10/19/06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: in some cases it would be nice if apache redirected all requests to ServerAlias to ServerName automatically... a wishlist bug probably? Yes, I've always sort-of wanted a UseCanonicalName enforce that would redirect to the canonical

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

> -Original Message- > From: joe pond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 2:59 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443 > > I noticed on 10/19/2006 several postings about this. I may > have included too

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

Hi, let us know if the second HTTPS Vhost works with second certificate, i think it is not possible to have a second namebased HTTPS vhost, because the SSL handshake is done before Apache recieves the GET request and the host header. regards joe pond schrieb: I noticed on 10/19/2006 sever

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No response recieved from Apache at some external locations, but not others

Fantastic, thanks very much; that's likely to be it, I have a very vague recollection of fiddling with MTU on my router, something to do with trying to get it to keep the ADSL PPPoE connection alive for longer, but I didn't really know what I was doing so I should have left it well alone. I wil

[EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

I noticed on 10/19/2006 several postings about this. I may have included too much stuff but some folks may need the info. The following configuration setup enables me to have multiple vhost on port 80 and multiple vhosts on port 443 and I can require login/password or not for eithe port 80 or

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with apache2 as a reverse proxy and OWA

Hi, i think you like to have an ReverseProxy not an ForwardProxy http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_proxy.html#forwardreverse therefore you normally only need mod_proxy and mod_proxy_http. Switch ProxyVia to off it's the default Value so you also can delete that line from your httpd.conf

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No response recieved from Apache at some external locations, but not others

Robert Elliot wrote: > OK, try http://www.lidalia.org.uk - should show > the Apache splash page. Unless I'm mistaken, this site is hosted on a DSL connection that uses PPPoE? What I think is happening is that data is getting sent from one side or the other assuming a

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost + SSL certificate problem

> -Original Message- > From: Laszlo Nagy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:44 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost + SSL certificate problem > > > Hello All, > > I have a little problem with my Apache. Here is the so

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Deadlock" msgs in error_log

On Don 19.10.2006 11:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alex, Do you think that setting the AcceptMutex posixsem,pthread would also be applicable in our case? Yes, just try to set the directive and you will see if *works* or not. Also, besides the errors and warnings appearing in the Apache error

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost + SSL certificate problem

Laszlo Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello All, > > I have a little problem with my Apache. Here is the software version: > > #apachectl -v > Server version: Apache/2.0.59 > Server built: Oct 4 2006 08:32:33 > #uname -a > FreeBSD designaproduct.biz 6.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 6.1-RE

FW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No response recieved from Apache at some external locations, but not others

Title: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No response recieved from Apache at some external locations, but not others Just as an update, I have managed to view a web page from the same subnet as my home one from my place of work.  Which suggests to me that it's not a matter of my place of work's FW do

[EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost + SSL certificate problem

Hello All, I have a little problem with my Apache. Here is the software version: #apachectl -v Server version: Apache/2.0.59 Server built: Oct 4 2006 08:32:33 #uname -a FreeBSD designaproduct.biz 6.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 #2: Thu Sep 7 07:13:22 EDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Deadlock" msgs in error_log

Alexander Lazic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mit 18.10.2006 19:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >We're running Apache 2.0.55 on Solaris 9, and we are seeing a number of > >"[error]" and "[warn]" messages in the error_log file. The error msgs > >occur occasionally, but the warn

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No response recieved from Apache at some external locations, but not others

>> -Original Message- >> From: Robert Elliot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] >> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 12:08 PM >> To: users@httpd.apache.org >> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No response recieved from Apache at >> some external locations, but not others >> >> H

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No response recieved from Apache at some external locations, but not others

> -Original Message- > From: Robert Elliot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 12:08 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No response recieved from Apache at > some external locations, but not others > > Hi, I'm having issues running Apach

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirection to www

On 18.10.06 18:45, Joshua Slive wrote: > On 10/18/06, stupidmail4me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >What's the easiest way to redirect people so that they > >go to www. > > > >IE, they type in foo.com and they automatically get > >redirected to www.foo.com. How can you ensure that the > >www part is

[EMAIL PROTECTED] No response recieved from Apache at some external locations, but not others

Hi, I'm having issues running Apache/2.0.59 (Win32) DAV/2 mod_auth_sspi/1.0.4 mod_ssl/2.0.59 OpenSSL/0.9.8c SVN/1.4.0 Server on Windows Server 2003. I reckon about 60% of external people can see the website, and 40% cannot.  Unfortunately all three of my external attempts to retrieve a flat HTM

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resending requests

> -Original Message- > From: Arjun Datta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 5:36 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resending requests > > Hi, > > I have a question regarding whether something can be done or > not using > Apache 2.2.

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I get Apache to start on it's own

> -Original Message- > From: Tom Ray [Lists] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 2:57 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I get Apache to start on it's own > > I've upgraded my apache install and have a few instances of apache > ru

[EMAIL PROTECTED] WinXP apache config

Hi Guys,       Im running Apache/1.3.34 (Win32) PHP/5.1.6 on winXP.     The machine is on my intranet, all local ip addresses.     Accessing pages i develop is possible from localhost, but when i move on to another machine on my intranet.And try to view the website, via ip of the apache ma

[EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with apache2 as a reverse proxy and OWA

Hi, I am using a apache2 server (version 2.0.54-10) under SuSE linux 10.0 as a reverse proxy for an Outlook Web Access (OWA) under Exchange 2003 SP2. I want to use only port 443 (SSL) to get into OWA. Login is ok and under a IE6 or Firewfox browser I can see something of the OWA site - but not a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Deadlock" msgs in error_log

Hi, On Mit 18.10.2006 19:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're running Apache 2.0.55 on Solaris 9, and we are seeing a number of "[error]" and "[warn]" messages in the error_log file. The error msgs occur occasionally, but the warn msgs are output quite frequently. The error msgs say: [error] [