On Thursday 27 July 2006 01:16, Marc Perkel wrote:
> OK - So - this is a bug and needs to be fixed? You would think that an
> HTTP server as popular as Apache would be able to support case
> insensitive URLs.
There is no such thing as a "case insensitive URL".
There are open, published internetwo
On 7/26/06, Jim Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all,
I currently added a new server running Win2k3 server standard,
Apache 2, and a decent set of hardware specs (2.8ghz xeon, 1GB ram). I
currently have two other machines running Apache 2 on the same setup
without any issues. In fact, th
Jim Keller wrote:
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the reply. The configs are identical on all three
machines; these servers just serve up a few custom ASP scripts to relay
information from the field to the backoffice (via a custom software
package that uses HTTP requests to send & retrieve the data). I
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the reply. The configs are identical on all three
machines; these servers just serve up a few custom ASP scripts to relay
information from the field to the backoffice (via a custom software
package that uses HTTP requests to send & retrieve the data). In fact,
there's no
If the hardware is relatively the same id say start by checking the
differences in the configs. What MPM are you running? Do you have
keepalives on? On a server that experiences many hits I found better
results in turning keepalives off or setting the max keepalive timeout
to <=5. Are you noticing
Hey all,
I currently added a new server running Win2k3 server standard,
Apache 2, and a decent set of hardware specs (2.8ghz xeon, 1GB ram). I
currently have two other machines running Apache 2 on the same setup
without any issues. In fact, they run quite reliably. However, I'm
having some
On 7/26/06, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i have a server down and i need redirect all urls that users might have saved
as a favorite, to just the base url (on another server) so they can see the
information page that were currently down for a hardware failure
(www.linuxiso.org)
im t
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 18:19, Jonathan Horne wrote:
> i have a server down and i need redirect all urls that users might have
> saved as a favorite, to just the base url (on another server) so they can
> see the information page that were currently down for a hardware failure
> (www.linuxiso.org
On 7/26/06, Craig M. Houck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks;
I have my virtual host working now, the DNS person hadn't added it when I
thought.
However any http://vietualhost.com/~user is prefixing the DocumentRoot for
my virtual host. It is not seeing the change I make in the mods-avaliable
dir
OK - So - this is a bug and needs to be fixed? You would think that an
HTTP server as popular as Apache would be able to support case
insensitive URLs. For that matter you would think that Linux should
support case insensitive file systems. That's one of the areas where
Windows is superior to L
i have a server down and i need redirect all urls that users might have saved
as a favorite, to just the base url (on another server) so they can see the
information page that were currently down for a hardware failure
(www.linuxiso.org)
im trying to google this out, but the time it would take
You are awesome. Thank you very much.
-Original Message-
From: Richard de Vries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 6:04 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perl data-file
Sounds like something fo suexec
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/sue
Sounds like something fo suexec
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/suexec.html
--- Declerck Michael-W30479 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a problem with an Apache version 2.2 server
> running a Perl script
> on an Ubuntu 6.06 machine that creates and appends a
> data-file.
> Currentl
Hello,
I have a problem
with an Apache version 2.2 server running a
Perl script on an Ubuntu 6.06 machine that creates and appends a data-file.
Currently, the
data-file exists one folder deep in the document root.
Apache clients run
as the user daemon in group daemon.
When the data-file
is
Thanks for the reply, the hard drives are different, the distro is
different (gentoo and mandriva), I've tried apache 2.0, and 2.2.2,
MaxClients is set to 512, most it sees is 200 or so. mod_whatkilledus
doesn't do anything, that's whats weird, no output at all, same for core
dumps. By mod_systemst
linux? if its that, then you are kinda stuck. I ran a site that used
2.0 and then we got 2.2.12 and the difference between /foo\ and /foo/
and \foo\ was that under Windows, its ...\foo\... and under Linux its
.../foo/... and in freeBSD its ...\foo/ and under NetBSD ../foo\... so
its a battle of th
On 7/26/06, Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know if no one saw it, or no one can help, but I'll try one more
time, this is honestly my last hope and im not sure what else to do
Im having trouble debugging a segmentation fault, the server i
Folks;
I have my virtual host working now, the DNS person hadn't added it when I
thought.
However any http://vietualhost.com/~user is prefixing the DocumentRoot for
my virtual host. It is not seeing the change I make in the mods-avaliable
directory.
Some files below for your review:
userdir.con
what is repeated? the
exports.c && touch exports.lo
exports.c:1585: error: redefinition of p_hack_apr_base64_encode_lenfor
dir in /mnt/hdb1/h/httpd-2.2.2/include /mnt/hdb1/h/httpd-2.2.2/os/unix
/mnt/hdb1/h/httpd-2.2.2/modules/http; do \
or
dir in /mnt/hdb1/h/httpd-2.2.2/include /mnt/hdb1/h/http
Hi all!
I have an application hosted in two servers:
https://server1.mydomain.com/app_name
https://server2.mydomain.com/app_name
The client have a system (not a browser) that must access the
application and send username and password through a POST method.
How can I did a load balancing in th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Marc,
I noticed this issue switching from IIS to Apache. My initial research
pointed to file names being case insensitive, but directories still
remaining case sensitive. Please let me know if you find out otherwise.
Steven.
OK - In Apache 2.0 the director
Hi Marc,
I noticed this issue switching from IIS to Apache. My initial research
pointed to file names being case insensitive, but directories still
remaining case sensitive. Please let me know if you find out otherwise.
Steven.
I just upgraded from 2.0 to 2.2 and there seems to be a problem. I was
using mod speling to make my sites case insensitive by that no longer is
working. How do I make Apache ignore the case of filenames?
-
The official User-To
Well, I managed to get authentication working, but not by using require
valid-user. If I change it from valid user to ldap-user and
specify a user, that works, however it is a bit cumbersome. I can also
get it to work more to my liking if I change the require statement to,
say:
require ldap-at
I don’t know if no one saw it, or no
one can help, but I’ll try one more time, this is honestly my last hope
and im not sure what else to do
Im having trouble debugging a segmentation fault, the server
is only running a phpAdsNew ads server. The system:
Dual opteron box runni
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Neu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 3:11 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTML Form instead of browser
> prompt for authentication?
>
> Hello Owen,
>
> the apache is only a proxy meant for auth
Write your own realm. This isn't a big Problem.
regards Dietmar
"Peter Neu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> am 26.07.2006 15:18:43
Bitte antworten an users@httpd.apache.org
An:
Kopie:
Thema: AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTML Form instead of browser prompt for
authentication?
Yes, but I does no
Yes, but I does not support Ip-Filter plus Password Authentication in a
XOR scenario. That's why I going through all this trouble :o/
-Pete
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Juli 2006 15:16
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betre
Hello Peter,
tomcat support form based auth with simple declaration in the web.xml.
The datasource can be database, ldap or flat file.
regards Dietmar
"Peter Neu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> am 26.07.2006 15:10:47
Bitte antworten an users@httpd.apache.org
An:
Kopie:
Thema: AW: [EMAIL PROTECT
Hello Owen,
the apache is only a proxy meant for authentication. I simply forward all
requests to a tomcat server. Natural answer would be why don't configure
authentication there? That's because somebody needed ip based authentication
(x)or password authentication. This is nuts, I know but It's t
This module looks
interesting but I don’t see how these two modules can work together.
The configuration so far
looks like this
Order deny,allow
Deny from all
Allow from 192.168.
AuthName "MySQL Auth"
AuthType Basic
AuthMySQLHost localhost
AuthMySQLDB test
AuthMySQL
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Neu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 12:40 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTML Form instead of browser prompt
> for authentication?
>
> Hello,
>
> I use the apache authentication with mod_auth_mys
Peter Neu wrote:
Hello,
I use the apache authentication with mod_auth_mysql.
Since I don't use php or cgi I get the ugly browser prompt for user name
and password.
Is there a way to configure apache to simply use a HTML form for
authentication?
If yes, how is this done? (CGI and PHP a
Hello,
I use the apache authentication with mod_auth_mysql.
Since I don't use php or cgi I get the ugly browser prompt for user name
and password.
Is there a way to configure apache to simply use a HTML form for
authentication?
If yes, how is this done? (CGI and PHP are working)
I use apache
34 matches
Mail list logo
