[EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE 10.1 and Apache 2.2.2

Hey Group; I have both apr and apu install in /usr/include/apr/apr*.h and /usr/include/apu/apu*.h The error below has been shortened so as not to cause NET problems However; the last set of line is seen over and over -- 73 de Donn Washburn Ham Callsign N5XWB Email: " [EMAIL PROTECTED] " 307 Sa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

On 7/25/06, Domingos Parra Novo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thats one thing I like about squid. Since it uses a single daemon model (no child/threads et all), all objects are available to all clients, in one single cache (be it memory or disk cache). You can have the same thing with apa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication (digest) - help

Hello Many thanks. I am running apache 2.2. I wonder how should I point the browser to call the /private/ given in the example of the url you sent me. Ed On Tuesday 25 July 2006 20:37, Joshua Slive wrote: > On 7/25/06, Eduardo Mendes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > /home/eduardo/public_htm >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Retirement of mod_aspdotnet

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: In short, a number of developers and powerusers tested the potential build 2004 release of mod_aspdotnet, but not enough httpd project committee folks were either willing or able to cast a vote to release the software. And _I_ still think it's a crying shame. What a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication (digest) - help

On 7/25/06, Eduardo Mendes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: /home/eduardo/public_htm l/.htaccess: Invalid command 'AuthDigestFile', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration I have no idea what apache is telling? All the modules have been loaded! What versi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication (digest) - help

Hello I am trying to get digest auth to work with my web server. I am using my home dir as an example. http.conf (bits that I think are important) LoadModule auth_digest_module modules/mod_auth_digest.so # # # UserDir is disabled by default since it can confirm the presence # o

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Retirement of mod_aspdotnet

Graeme Walker wrote: Hi, I noticed that the mod_aspdotnet has been retired, does anyone have any info as to why, or if the module is going to be developed as a core Apache module. The last thing I want to do is return to IIS for ASP.NET development :) Simply stay tuned for

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Retirement of mod_aspdotnet

Hi,I noticed that the mod_aspdotnet has been retired, does anyone have any info as to why, or if the module is going to be developed as a core Apache module. The last thing I want to do is return to IIS for ASP.NET development :)G.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

Hiyas, Joshua Slive escreveu: On 7/25/06, Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm unable to find the RPMs for Fedora or CentOS (which we're using) that correspond to 2.2.x. Well, actually, I found a src RPM, which is being compiled with options I need to customize (possibly via

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_log_mysql and 2.2?

Nick Kew wrote: > On Tuesday 25 July 2006 07:16, Brandon Fosdick wrote: >> Anyone have any experience using mod_log_mysql with the 2.2 release? > > Nope. > > If it worked with 2.0, it should work fine with 2.2. But with 2.2 you should > be using DBD instead of hooking a module directly into mysq

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

Forrest Aldrich wrote: The only thing that would vary, in this case, is if the image had been updated/changed, in which case it would need to be pulled in from the backend DB. The images are 768k jpg (or less), and because it's a cache, it's disposable... That is not a vary ;-) And it's

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

On 7/25/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Forrest Aldrich wrote: > > The servers have an absurd amount of RAM (8gb or more) that we could > utilize for mod_mem_cache. If that's the case, if your content is non-trivial (different reactions to client characteristics, such as lang

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Forrest Aldrich wrote: The servers have an absurd amount of RAM (8gb or more) that we could utilize for mod_mem_cache. If that's the case, if your content is non-trivial (different reactions to client characteristics, such as language, charset, or browser conten

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

Forrest Aldrich wrote: The servers have an absurd amount of RAM (8gb or more) that we could utilize for mod_mem_cache. If that's the case, if your content is non-trivial (different reactions to client characteristics, such as language, charset, or browser content that varies) - I strongly rec

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

Joshua Slive wrote: On 7/25/06, Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm unable to find the RPMs for Fedora or CentOS (which we're using) that correspond to 2.2.x. Well, actually, I found a src RPM, which is being compiled with options I need to customize (possibly via rpmbuild) - I'm

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

On 7/25/06, Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm unable to find the RPMs for Fedora or CentOS (which we're using) that correspond to 2.2.x. Well, actually, I found a src RPM, which is being compiled with options I need to customize (possibly via rpmbuild) - I'm from FreeBSD, so RPM is

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

Joshua Slive wrote: On 7/25/06, Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What is the difference in stability (etc) with these options on httpd-2.0 and httpd-2.2? Thanks. usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_mem_cache.so usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_file_cache.so usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_disk_cache.so usr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuring Password Protection

On 7/25/06, Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # .htaccess AuthUserFile /usr/local/www/postfixadmin/admin/.htpasswd AuthGroupFile /dev/null AuthName "Postfix Admin" AuthType Basic require valid-user # .htpasswd admin:$apr1$5ip4S/..$cmAmYFlZa1gLHGwFFw2.G0 In addition to the other usef

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

On 7/25/06, Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What is the difference in stability (etc) with these options on httpd-2.0 and httpd-2.2? Thanks. usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_mem_cache.so usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_file_cache.so usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_disk_cache.so usr/lib/httpd/modules/mo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Logging access to specific URL.

On 7/25/06, Krist van Besien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Our website is dynamic, but for demo purposes a static copy has been made (using wget) and put under docroot/demo. Now I've been asked if it is possible to have all requests to these files logged to a seperate file. How to do this? I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Directory/Virtualhost & ACLs.

On 7/25/06, Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So, first question. Do Directory and Virtualhost blocks have >> their own ACLs? Seem to from where I'm sitting. > > They do, but they will inherit from the parent context when nothing is > specified. > See: > http://httpd.apache.org

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [DEV-REQUEST] mod_ifenv ported to Apache2

On 7/25/06, SithLord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 25 July 2006 03:18, Joshua Slive wrote: > First, SSL without a valid certificate trusted by the client is not > any safer than plain-text in the end. A "man-in-the-middle" could sit > on the wire, provide your clients with a bogus certi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Auth Not Working (inside Dir VHost)

On Tuesday 25 July 2006 18:38, Richard Collyer wrote: > Order allow,deny > Allow from all yes. > satisfy any The above is always satisfied. -- Nick Kew - The official User-T

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Auth Not Working (inside Dir VHost)

On 7/25/06, Richard Collyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ServerName steve.firebadger.net ServerAlias steve.firebadger.net DocumentRoot /home/httpd/vhosts/firebadger.net/steve Options Indexes FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] help with Segmentation fault

Sorry I left that out, following the directions with using CoreDumpDirectory I ran ulimit -c unlimited prior to starting apache, still nothing =\ -Original Message- From: Vincent Bray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 1:44 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [E

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] help with Segmentation fault

On 7/25/06, Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At first I thought it was a ram issue, but when I moved it to another web server running apache 2.0.58/php5.0.4 the same thing happens. I've attempted to setup a core dump directory using the CoreDumpDirectory directive, the directory is owned by

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuring Password Protection

Boyle Owen wrote: > You simply have to allow access to the target directory (since it is > above the doc root, it would usually be "denied"). Just add "Allow from > all" in the directory container. > > BTW, you may be suffering from the popular misconception that > AllowOverride and .htaccess fil

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auth Not Working (inside Dir VHost)

Hello, Trying to get auth working. The vhost looks like: ServerName steve.firebadger.net ServerAlias steve.firebadger.net DocumentRoot /home/httpd/vhosts/firebadger.net/steve Options Indexes FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None

[EMAIL PROTECTED] help with Segmentation fault

Im having trouble debugging a segmentation fault, the server is only running phpAdsNew. The system: Dual opteron box running gentoo 2.6 kernel Apache 2.0.58 PHP 5.1.4   When we hit our peak hours is when the seg faults start occurring:   [Tue Jul 25 13:09:32 2006] [notice] child pid

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

What is the difference in stability (etc) with these options on httpd-2.0 and httpd-2.2? Thanks. usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_mem_cache.so usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_file_cache.so usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_disk_cache.so usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_cache.so -

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuring Password Protection

--- Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BTW, you may be suffering from the popular misconception that > AllowOverride and .htaccess files are needed for password protection. > They're not. If you can edit the config, as you can, it's usually better > to put all the Auth directives straigh

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuring Password Protection

On Tuesday 25 July 2006 15:30, Gerard wrote: > > The only difference between a user's directory and the main document > > root is that the document root is configured on the DocumentRoot > > directive and gets whatever settings that are made for it. Nope. Only true if all users have equal access

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuring Password Protection

> -Original Message- > From: Gerard Seibert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > And what's in the error log? > > [Tue Jul 25 04:46:35 2006] [error] [client 72.14.194.17] > client denied by server configuration: > /usr/local/www/postfixadmin/, referer: > http://www.seibercom.net/postfixa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuring Password Protection

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Jerry McAllister wrote: Using Apache-2.2.2 on a FreeBSD-6.1 STABLE system. I recently installed 'postfixadmin' on to my system. The documentation said to insert the following into the httpd.conf file: Options Indexes AllowOverride AuthConfig That's ra

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuring Password Protection

> > On Tuesday 25 July 2006 12:43, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > Using Apache-2.2.2 on a FreeBSD-6.1 STABLE system. > > > > I recently installed 'postfixadmin' on to my system. The documentation > > said to insert the following into the httpd.conf file: > > > > > > Options Indexes > >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuring Password Protection

Nick Kew wrote: > On Tuesday 25 July 2006 12:43, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > Using Apache-2.2.2 on a FreeBSD-6.1 STABLE system. > > > > I recently installed 'postfixadmin' on to my system. The documentation > > said to insert the following into the httpd.conf file: > > > > > > Options Inde

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] referer header field too long?

On 7/25/06, Peter Posselt Vestergaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Joshua Slive > Sent: 24. juli 2006 17:30 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] referer header field too long? >

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Logging access to specific URL.

Hello, Our website is dynamic, but for demo purposes a static copy has been made (using wget) and put under docroot/demo. Now I've been asked if it is possible to have all requests to these files logged to a seperate file. How to do this? I cannot add a customlog directive to a container unfortu

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuring Password Protection

On Tuesday 25 July 2006 12:43, Gerard Seibert wrote: > Using Apache-2.2.2 on a FreeBSD-6.1 STABLE system. > > I recently installed 'postfixadmin' on to my system. The documentation > said to insert the following into the httpd.conf file: > > > Options Indexes > AllowOverride Auth

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Directory/Virtualhost & ACLs.

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Joshua Slive wrote: On 7/24/06, Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey all, Have a messy config question here. Directory and Virtualhost seem to fire up what amounts to their own ACLs, i.e. order, allow and deny. We just got hit last week by an au

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache fails to restart

Matt- Yes, I agree. It's a very frustrating scenario. My experience has been that the OS is just fine, with other services being unaffected by the Apache break down. It always happens at peak load periods, usually when several web applications are being hit hard at the same time. If something w

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuring Password Protection

Using Apache-2.2.2 on a FreeBSD-6.1 STABLE system. I recently installed 'postfixadmin' on to my system. The documentation said to insert the following into the httpd.conf file: Options Indexes AllowOverride AuthConfig After doing so and restarting Apache, I was unable to fin

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache LDAP

> -Original Message- > From: powerspike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:03 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache LDAP > > > hello friends! > you can say to me where I can find the instructions for being > able to use > authentic

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache LDAP

hello friends! you can say to me where I can find the instructions for being able to use authentication LDAP with Apache? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/apache-LDAP-tf1997371.html#a5482642 Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users forum at Nabble.com. -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [DEV-REQUEST] mod_ifenv ported to Apache2

On Tuesday 25 July 2006 12:12, Emmanuel E wrote: > thanks for the link. but what would be really nice is if the link could be > automatically included in the email (as part of the signature) while being > sent out. Some of the mail archives are offsite (not hosted at apache.org) and there are a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [DEV-REQUEST] mod_ifenv ported to Apache2

thanks for the link. but what would be really nice is if the link could be automatically included in the email (as part of the signature) while being sent out. two caveats on dynamic ip domains 1) no-ip.com has a wildcard certificate so it could m-i-t-m anything it wanted since it also control

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [DEV-REQUEST] mod_ifenv ported to Apache2

On Tuesday 25 July 2006 11:26, Emmanuel E wrote: > if youre worried about a man in the middle attack but still want a poor > man's hosting you could get a one month trial certificate from rapidssl.com > for practically any domain (including dynamic ones like mysite.no-ip.com.) > during the trial

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [DEV-REQUEST] mod_ifenv ported to Apache2

On Tuesday 25 July 2006 05:49, Nick Kew wrote: > mod_proxy in /trunk/ now supports that. But part of the stability > pledge Apache offers to users is that changes like this must be > properly reviewed by at least three developers before going into > a release version, and we have higher-priority

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [DEV-REQUEST] mod_ifenv ported to Apache2

if youre worried about a man in the middle attack but still want a poor man's hosting you could get a one month trial certificate from rapidssl.com for practically any domain (including dynamic ones like mysite.no-ip.com.) during the trial period (they basically set the certificate to expire in

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [DEV-REQUEST] mod_ifenv ported to Apache2

On Tuesday 25 July 2006 03:18, Joshua Slive wrote: > First, SSL without a valid certificate trusted by the client is not > any safer than plain-text in the end. A "man-in-the-middle" could sit > on the wire, provide your clients with a bogus certificate, and > decrypt all the traffic on the way b

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache fails to restart

Rob, This won't be much help, but we've had this happen under severe load too (Apache 2.0.50, RHEL 3, 2.4.21-40). I haven't managed to find an explanation, but my current assumption is that either Apache or the OS is running out of some critical resource (file descriptors? socket limits? who