Could it possibly be for communication with a DNS server ? Have you tried
sniffing UDP packets sent to/from this port?
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Richard de Vries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 7:07 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A
It seems like there is some fundamental misunderstanding about HTTP and the
way the Siteminder WebAgents work.
Let mpe say a few words about the Web Agent.
When the WebAgent (SMWA) (which may either be an Apache module or an
application server plug-in known as TAI) receives a request for a pro
Hi All,
when you have x amount of virtual sites on the one machine and all of
the domains point to the same IP in DNS, how does apache distinguish
which site the request is for? Is it something in the payload section
from the upper layer of the frame that comes in? I understnad that DNS
resol
On 7/5/06, Qingshan Xie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thx a lot Joshua for your quick reply.
We did some debugging. SiteMinder indeed returned all
SiteMinder headers( Cookies and SessionID), but some
how Apache in the front stripped them off and return
304. We did not implement cache, I don't know
I suggest a 600 perms sub-conf file you 'Include' in the main httpd.conf,
illegible to the non-root user. Or use starttls/ssl and add this client's
ldap cert to your servers ldap CA chain, protecting the key 600 as you
would always do. Same difference.
Erik Froese wrote:
I'm trying to move fr
Qingshan Xie wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Our Linux will be upgraded to 64-bit OS but the
current Apache binary was compiled in 32-bit. Can
32-bit Apache binary run on 64-bit Linux OS without
any issue?
Without *any* issue, not likley.
You're best off recompiling apache, otherwise you'll spend m
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 03:46:00PM -0700, Qingshan Xie wrote:
> Our Linux will be upgraded to 64-bit OS but the
> current Apache binary was compiled in 32-bit. Can
> 32-bit Apache binary run on 64-bit Linux OS without
> any issue?
That depends on the 32-bit architecture you're moving from and t
Hi,
Our Linux will be upgraded to 64-bit OS but the
current Apache binary was compiled in 32-bit. Can
32-bit Apache binary run on 64-bit Linux OS without
any issue?
Thx, Q.Xie
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam prot
Title: Message
Building a static
Apache 1.3.36 & mod_perl 1.29 with the following
configure:
perl Makefile.PL
\APACHE_SRC=/usr/local/apache_1.3.36 \DO_HTTPD=1 \PERL_MARK_WHERE=1
\EVERYTHING=1 \PREFIX=/usr/local/apache
\APACHE_PREFIX=/usr/local/apache \USE_APACI
PREP_HTTPD=1
this config
Thx a lot Joshua for your quick reply.
We did some debugging. SiteMinder indeed returned all
SiteMinder headers( Cookies and SessionID), but some
how Apache in the front stripped them off and return
304. We did not implement cache, I don't know why it
has if-modify-since in the header and retur
Apache 2.2 makes it SOOO easy to talk to a Tomcat app by just using:
ProxyPass /mytomcatapp ajp://127.0.0.1:8009/mytomcatapp
But the problem I'm facing is that I have an app that uses it's own
stylesheets and javascripts. Further, the app itself calls the contents
on these directories with rela
Hi,
I tried working with code looking something like this but the IE still
doesn't respond instantly
if($pid)
{
print ("Location:
http://ABAB:7070/miniProject/filepath.html\n\n";);
exit 0 ;
}
else
I'm trying to move from apache 2.0 to 2.2 and would like to use the supplied *ldap modulesthat are built into apache. I'd like to authenticate against our LDAP but we don't alow anonymousbinds and I'd rather not store an LDAP user's name and pw in an apache conf file to get LDAP
authentication work
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 7/5/06, Qingshan Xie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Boyle,
I have a related question. We'd like to implement
a SSL-Login on a HTTP(port 80) webServer to secure the
userId/password. This means, whenever a site needs
the authentication, the webServer redirects it to
HT
On 7/5/06, Qingshan Xie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Boyle,
I have a related question. We'd like to implement
a SSL-Login on a HTTP(port 80) webServer to secure the
userId/password. This means, whenever a site needs
the authentication, the webServer redirects it to
HTTPS server for proces
Hi, Boyle,
I have a related question. We'd like to implement
a SSL-Login on a HTTP(port 80) webServer to secure the
userId/password. This means, whenever a site needs
the authentication, the webServer redirects it to
HTTPS server for processing. However, this is pretty
annoying since it pro
On 7/5/06, Rajat Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Jashua, but I am on windows and cannot redirect to /dev/null
It doesn't matter how you do it. The point is to close all three file
descriptors on the forked process.
Joshua.
-
On 7/5/06, Qingshan Xie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Joshua.
We are using SiteMinder for
Authentication/Authorization, and Single-Sign-On. The
missing part of the headers is SiteMinder SessionID
and Cookies, which causes the Single-Sign-On failed.
Is there any way to append those headers
While debugging an issue on one of my apache
webservers with lsof, I noticed the following:
httpd 16679 http 23u IPv4 0x30008c5fa88
0t0 UDP *:41034 (Idle)
httpd 16679 http 27u IPv4 0x30008bf4d20
0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound)
httpd 16679 http 28u IPv
Thanks Jashua, but I am on windows and cannot redirect to /dev/null
Still looking
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Joshua Slive
Sent: Wed 7/5/2006 12:04 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CGI help on apache needed
On 7/5/06, Wil
Thanks Joshua.
We are using SiteMinder for
Authentication/Authorization, and Single-Sign-On. The
missing part of the headers is SiteMinder SessionID
and Cookies, which causes the Single-Sign-On failed.
Is there any way to append those headers back when
Apache throws 304? Can we use mod_head
It sounds like a bug, but for good measure, try closing both STDOUT and
the STDERR handle.
Rajat Sharma wrote:
Intrestingly,
Even if CGI is told to print instantly, the apache knows that the "long
job" is doing something and might need to print out. This is why it
waits for the "long job" to be
On 7/5/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 7/5/06, Rajat Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> My cgi script needs to do some dirty work. User is supposed to be
>> notified
>> via email when the job is done.
>
>> Issue is that the after submit of the page
Intrestingly,
Even if CGI is told to print instantly, the apache knows that the "long
job" is doing something and might need to print out. This is why it
waits for the "long job" to be over before it releases the STDOUT pipe.
I thought I will fork it, close the PIPE on child which is supposed to
Hi William,
STDOUT still remains under Apache's control.
When I invoke the CGI and tell it to redirect. It processes the request
but which remains in some kind of queue and waits until the subsequent
job ( which takes very long time to finish) completes.
If I have my own daemon, say dameon.pl,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 7/4/06, Matteo Corti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am managing several web servers with a very similar configuration. On
>> one instance I get a segmentation fa
Is there really a need to use forking? Instead, how about:
1. CGI prints instant reply.
2. CGI execs long job (you *are* using exec and not system, right?), and
exits.
3. long job sends mail (exec or system or a subroutine) when it's done.
You'd need to pass $loginid to the long job of
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 7/5/06, Rajat Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My cgi script needs to do some dirty work. User is supposed to be
notified
via email when the job is done.
Issue is that the after submit of the page, the IE still keeps loading
the
page until the long\dirty job is over
On 7/5/06, Rajat Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My cgi script needs to do some dirty work. User is supposed to be notified
via email when the job is done.
Issue is that the after submit of the page, the IE still keeps loading the
page until the long\dirty job is over.
How can I make lin
Hi,
My cgi script needs to do some dirty work. User is supposed
to be notified via email when the job is done.
Here is the use case
a) user clicks
submit on a form to start the job
b) An instant
message is thrown back to the user saying the job has started successf
Jacqui Caren wrote:
> Pid wrote:
>> Hardward load balancing is when you use specific types of network
>> equipment which present a single external interface while directing
>> traffic evenly between the servers behind it.
>>
>> Software does the same, but you'd install it on a server acting as a
Pid wrote:
Hardward load balancing is when you use specific types of network
equipment which present a single external interface while directing
traffic evenly between the servers behind it.
Software does the same, but you'd install it on a server acting as a
front controller. You can use the m
No - that's not possible.
What you can do however, is to use mod_rewrite to retrieve the ssl id from the
client-rproxy connection and insert it as a header into the rproxy-balancer
connection. Search for previous threads on this list about forwarding client
certificate data to a backend server
Hello
This is my first mail here and I know a poor English, so please excuse any
inconvenience... ;)
I'm trying to setup a reverse proxy using mod_proxy to a cluster of
WebServers, balanced with an Alteon G5 with sslid mechanism. Indeed, the
reverse proxies are a cluster of 4 too, balance
> -Original Message-
> From: mortee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:02 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] specifying https-specific directives
>
>
> Thanks. You mean mod_ssl's %{HTTPS} variable, right?
>
> And how do I use it to d
35 matches
Mail list logo
