[EMAIL PROTECTED] /my.html#mySection

2006-06-17 Thread Mike - EMAIL IGNORED
I have seen in several browsers that requests such as http://www.xxx.net/my.html#mySection get to the server without the #mySection . The page is delivered and the #mySection is resolved locally by the browser, as would seem to be appropriate. Now my CGI does not know about #mySection. If it

[EMAIL PROTECTED] authentication problem with apache2 + ldap + active directory

2006-06-17 Thread empty body
ldap authentication fails with the following message in the error log: - [Sat Jun 17 21:11:19 2006] [debug] mod_auth_ldap.c(337): [client 192.168.x.x] [22698] auth_ldap authenticate: using URL ldap://ad.host.name.com:389/DC=XYZ,DC=ABC,DC=com?sAMAccountName?sub?(objectClass=*) [Sat

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frontpage 301 Redirect

2006-06-17 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/17/06, Warwick Bruce Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua Slive wrote: > On 6/17/06, Warwick Bruce Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I have tried creating a redirect-carefully entry for "Mozilla/4.0 >> (compatible; MS FrontPage 6.0)", but that made little difference. I >> upgr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frontpage 301 Redirect

2006-06-17 Thread Warwick Bruce Chapman
Joshua Slive wrote: On 6/17/06, Warwick Bruce Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have tried creating a redirect-carefully entry for "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MS FrontPage 6.0)", but that made little difference. I upgraded apache to latest. I tried all combinations of trailing slashes on D

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frontpage 301 Redirect

2006-06-17 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/17/06, Warwick Bruce Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have tried creating a redirect-carefully entry for "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MS FrontPage 6.0)", but that made little difference. I upgraded apache to latest. I tried all combinations of trailing slashes on Directory parameters.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] compilation problem for apache2 + ldap on solaris 8

2006-06-17 Thread empty body
this worked, thank you. On 6/17/06, Rainer Sokoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 12:59:19PM -0400, empty body wrote: > this is the error during make: [...] > ld: fatal: library -lnet: not found You need libnet (http://www.packetfactory.net/projects/libnet/). It is also avai

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Frontpage 301 Redirect

2006-06-17 Thread Warwick Bruce Chapman
Hi All I know this has been asked often, but I cannot seen to find a reponse from any of the previous posts. I have a client who insists on using FrontPage 2003 and I've setup WebDAV through Apache for him. It worked just find with 1.3, but since the migration to the 2.0 server we cannot se

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] compilation problem for apache2 + ldap on solaris 8

2006-06-17 Thread Rainer Sokoll
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 12:59:19PM -0400, empty body wrote: > this is the error during make: [...] > ld: fatal: library -lnet: not found You need libnet (http://www.packetfactory.net/projects/libnet/). It is also available through sunfreeware. Rainer

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] self-referential URL's and load balancer

2006-06-17 Thread Sander Temme
Hi enigma, On Jun 12, 2006, at 1:53 PM, enigma wrote: I have a problem with the self-referential URL's being generated by Apache when a hardware load balancer is front ending it. This is a well-known problem with load balancing and SSL offload in front of any web server. The httpd simp

[EMAIL PROTECTED] compilation problem for apache2 + ldap on solaris 8

2006-06-17 Thread empty body
this is the error during make: - /export/home/username/software/src/httpd-2.2.2/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -pthreads -fPIC -mv8plus -O3 -L/usr/local/lib -L/export/home/username/software/src/httpd-2.2.2/srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/lib -R/usr/local/lib -L/opt/OpenSSL/lib

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] query string from POST method

2006-06-17 Thread Richard de Vries
Have a look at mod_security. (http://www.modsecurity.org) R --- rturnbull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello to all, > Is there a way though httpd proxy to "show" the > arguments sent with > a POST method? I have been trying to find a way to > reveal arguments > from our java applicatio

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Can we set "ThreadsPerChild=1000" or higher in worker MPM?

2006-06-17 Thread Qingshan Xie
Hi! All, We have Apache 2.0.54 installed on a SUN box with Solaris 8. We use 'worker' MPM. Based on our service requirement, we'd like to set the "ThreadsPerChild=1000" or even higher. As I know, the default ThreadsPerChild is 64 in Unix, not sure what's the impact if the value set is much h