Mike Dewhirst wrote:
Mike Dewhirst wrote:
Boyle Owen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dewhirst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some people are convinced the Earth is flat but that don't make it so
:-) By far the most likely reason for your problem still is that
apache is misconfig
On 11/16/05, Phil Endecott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> According to the docs for mod_headers you can arange for the header to
> be added either for sucessful requests only, or for all requests. But
> it seems to me that the "always" case doesn't really mean always, as the
> header
Mike Dewhirst wrote:
Boyle Owen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dewhirst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some people are convinced the Earth is flat but that don't make it so
:-) By far the most likely reason for your problem still is that
apache is misconfigured.
You are still rig
Dear List,
According to the docs for mod_headers you can arange for the header to
be added either for sucessful requests only, or for all requests. But
it seems to me that the "always" case doesn't really mean always, as the
header is not added when access has been denied.
Here's my particular
Thanks! added ServerAlias www.thecertnetwork.net as suggested. Did not see
that as an example in the httpd.conf. I'm learning!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:22 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PR
On 11/16/05, Florian Dufour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a strange problem with MultiViews and Apache 2.0.55 : in a
> directory, we have to files :
>
>lastname.en.html
>firstname.lastname.en.html
>
> MultiViews option is enabled in this directory.
>
> When I
How can you be so sure?
The modules works as expected when they are not loaded togheter!
And the behavour can see is exactly what should happen if the processing
order is incorrect.
Lars
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Kew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 16,
Hi,
is there a way to stop mod_proxy_html to stop "fixing" (sanitizing,
beautifying, destroying :-) the HTML it processes and only fixup the
embedded links?
I have a web server with some proprietary page generator that produces
not very correct (but working) HTML. After processing by mod_proxy_
Hi,
is there a way to stop mod_proxy_html to stop "fixing" (sanitizing,
beautifying, destroying :-) the HTML it processes and only fixup the
embedded links?
I have a web server with some proprietary page generator that produces
not very correct (but working) HTML. After processing by mod_proxy_
Oil Pine wrote:
> Reviewing the httpd access log, I found the following entries:
>
> 69.209.112.92 - - [16/Nov/2005:09:06:46 -0600] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 589
> "-" "-"
> 69.209.184.151 - - [16/Nov/2005:06:38:42 -0600] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 589 "-"
> "-"
> 69.209.184.151 - - [16/Nov/2005:02:39:10 -0
Michael Avila wrote:
> Windows XP Pro
> Apache 2.0.55
>
> First time more than 2 or 3 people accessed the server from external
> sources. Just kept getting a message that Apache was refusing the
> connection. Restart would not help. Had to stop and then start and it was
> okay. May happen again. B
Thank you Davide.
Two Listen works :) Is that the reason wise say Listen twice, act once :))
I have a different server running on port 80, so I chose 81.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Davide Bianchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 11:01 PM
To: users@httpd.
TonyY wrote:
Hi,
I have a quick question (I know I did before):
I can nolonger use the command
c:\>cd "\Program Files\Apache Group\Apache2\bin"
to change the directory from the Command prompt
I got: Parameter format not correct - "\Program
Foolish question, did you invoke command.com
It was thus said that the Great Davide Bianchi once stated:
>
> Richard Victor Correia wrote:
> > The default Port is 81
>
> ?? why 81 ?
My guess, Richard's ISP is blocking incoming access to port 80. When I
had Adelphia Cable they did this, and I ended up running a webserver on port
81.
-
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 18:22, Lars Ohlén wrote:
> And this is a problem for us. One of the dynamic modules should process the
> request before one of the dynamicly loaded once.
That has nothing to do with static vs dynamic, nor with module load order.
If your configuration doesn't work, yo
Hi,
Our Apache 2.0.54 configuration has both static and
dynamic modules. The problem we are having is that the static modules have
processed
the requst prior to the dynamicly
loaded modules (e.g. the static modules are always loaded before the
dynamic once).
And this is a problem for us.
Aaron Caesarowicz wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am running Apache 2.0.51 on Fedora Core 2.
(snip)
Unrelated to the issue you are describing, Apache 2.0.51 is affected
by about ten security vulnerabilities that have been fixed between
then and the newest version (2.0.55). See:
http://www.apache.org/dist/htt
I use two. The first is webalizer (http://www.mrunix.net/webalizer/).
The reports are usually enough for most small websites. However it
does segfault on RHEL 3 and despite posting questions for help on
their mailing the problem has not been resolved (I keep an RH9 box
around for a number of thi
Richard Victor Correia wrote:
> The default Port is 81
?? why 81 ?
> When I restart the server, I am able to see 9099, but not on 81.
You need two "listen" directives, one for 81 and one for 9099.
Davide
--
Today is a good day. Not because anything wonderful is happening,
so much, but because
Hi Joshua,
I hope you are having a nice day.
I am trying to run my web server on two ports simultaneously.
I am using apache 1.3 on red had linux server.
The default Port is 81, in addition to that I am adding "Listen 9099" in
httpd.cof.
When I restart the server, I am able to see 9099, but no
--On Wednesday, November 16, 2005 10:03 AM -0600 Oil Pine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Reviewing the httpd access log, I found the following entries:
69.209.112.92 - - [16/Nov/2005:09:06:46 -0600] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 589
"-" "-"
69.209.184.151 - - [16/Nov/2005:06:38:42 -0600] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 2
Hi, I have a quick question (I know I did before):I can nolonger use the command [ c:\>cd "\Program Files\Apache Group\Apache2\bin" ] to change the directory from the Command prompt I got: Parameter format not correct - "\Program What I should do? Thanks, Tony
Yahoo! FareChase - Search
Reviewing the httpd access log, I found the following entries:
69.209.112.92 - - [16/Nov/2005:09:06:46 -0600] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 589
"-" "-"
69.209.184.151 - - [16/Nov/2005:06:38:42 -0600] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 589 "-" "-"
69.209.184.151 - - [16/Nov/2005:02:39:10 -0600] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 589 "
On 11/16/05, HoWang Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just switch to 2.0 from 1.3, I found that I can't use user/group in
> vhost anymore. Is there any way to set it up?
> Please help, because my server is hosting more than one site & I don't want
> the users can make use of Apa
On 11/16/05, Mike Dewhirst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I force Apache2 to use existing crypt-generated passwords for
> BasicAuth and which are currently working fine on Apache 1.3.
>
> I am going to be migrating a lot of password lists to Apache2 and I'd
> like it to be a silent migration.
On 11/16/05, Aaron Caesarowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am running Apache 2.0.51 on Fedora Core 2. I cannot get the Virtual
> Servers to work as they should. I can only get one of the sites to work
> (infonumbers) and for every other virtual server I have, despite specifying
> the cor
On 11/16/05 4:43 AM, "HoWang Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just switch to 2.0 from 1.3, I found that I can't use user/group in
> vhost anymore. Is there any way to set it up?
> Please help, because my server is hosting more than one site & I don't want
> the users can make
Hello,
I have just switch to 2.0 from 1.3, I found that I can't use user/group in vhost anymore. Is there any way to set it up?
Please help, because my server is hosting more than one site & I
don't want the users can make use of Apache+CGI to read others files.
Thank you!
How can I force Apache2 to use existing crypt-generated passwords for
BasicAuth and which are currently working fine on Apache 1.3.
I am going to be migrating a lot of password lists to Apache2 and I'd
like it to be a silent migration.
Thanks
Mike
---
Boyle Owen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dewhirst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm convinced Apache 2.0.53 doesn't work as advertised in the
docs when
you try to get Basic Auth working without a .htaccess file.
Some people are convinced the Earth is flat but that don't make it s
30 matches
Mail list logo
