Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy and SSI from Back-End Apache

Hi, On 11/10/05, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/9/05, Devendra Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I checked the modules/mappers/mod_rewrite.c and found the following around> line 1828 (httpd-2.0.55):>> /*>  *  Ignore this rule on subrequests if we are explicitly> 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] combining mod_rewrite with mod_ntlm and fastcgi

Hi, I have a working apache 1.3 httpd.conf file which uses: 1) mod_rewrite to spot some requests which should be handled by a localhost zope server and prefix them with zope or zope/CKT/, say http://ckt/file.htm is rewritten as http://ckt/zope/CKT/file.htm (see the real rules below); 2) mod_ntl

[EMAIL PROTECTED] sysconfig.d/include.conf not generated

Hi, I'm going through the headaches (so many .conf files) of migrating from Apache 1.3 to 2.0 and when I run httpd2 it complains it can't find sysconfig.d/include.conf, which was supposed to be somehow generated. Why is this file missing?? Who is supposed to generate it? and how? What should be

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy and SSI from Back-End Apache

On 11/9/05, Devendra Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I checked the modules/mappers/mod_rewrite.c and found the following around > line 1828 (httpd-2.0.55): > > /* > * Ignore this rule on subrequests if we are explicitly > * asked to do so or this is a proxy-throughpu

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache server installation

On 11/9/05, Sameh H. Elkadry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I try to install Apache server on my PC(Windows XP SP2) using default > setting. Then I try to run cgi file in cig-bin directory but I failed and > get these errors in log file > > [Thu Nov 10 00:24:46 2005] [error] [client 10.0.0.1] script

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with AuthPAM_Enabled' error in Apache2

On 11/9/05, Mick England <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the reply. Here is the .htaccess file: > > AuthType Basic > AuthUserFile /home/othersite/users > AddHandler cgi-script .cgi > AuthName "Intranet" > require user admin > > As I said it relates to a complete different domain and does no

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

On 11/9/05, Matthew R. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Josh, I enabled LogLevel debug and below is the output from the error log: > And when the browser requests the images again. I assume since I see age > values in the reply that these messages are just part of the debug > information.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

Josh, I enabled LogLevel debug and below is the output from the error log: - [Wed Nov 09 16:27:48 2005] [debug] /home/gatekeeper/minfrin/rpm/BUILD/httpd-2.0.50/server/mpm/prefork/prefork.c(955): AcceptMutex: sysvsem (default: sysvsem) [Wed Nov 09

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache server installation

Hello all   I try to install Apache server on my PC(Windows XP SP2) using default setting. Then I try to run cgi file in cig-bin directory but I failed and get these errors in log file   [Thu Nov 10 00:24:46 2005] [error] [client 10.0.0.1] script not found or unable to stat: E:/OpenSA/A

[EMAIL PROTECTED] LDAP and AUTHENTICATE_[attribute] environment variables

The current documentation for the AuthLDAPUrl directive includes the following: ldap://host:port/basedn?attribute?scope?filter attribute The attribute to search for. Although RFC 2255 allows a comma-separated list of attributes, only the first attribute will be used, no ma

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with AuthPAM_Enabled' error in Apache2

Thanks for the reply. Here is the .htaccess file: AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /home/othersite/users AddHandler cgi-script .cgi AuthName "Intranet" require user admin As I said it relates to a complete different domain and does not sit in DocumentRoot of the VirtualHost I am trying to test. If I u

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with AuthPAM_Enabled' error in Apache2

On 11/9/05, Mick England <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In the error logs I see the following: > > [Wed Nov 09 15:03:51 2005] [alert] [client 69.212.211.252] /.htaccess: > Invalid command 'AuthPAM_Enabled', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a > module not included in the server configuration So w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [warn] (99)Cannot assign requested address: connect to listener on [::]:443

i did test -f /proc/net/if_inet6 && echo "Running kernel is IPv6 ready"and it printed out the text fine On 11/9/05, Joe A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the parent process is running as root, the children are running as nobody. how can i tell if i have IPv6 stack installed?  how can i tell if i have

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DSO: does the order of LoadModule matter?

Nick Kew wrote: On Wednesday 09 November 2005 19:48, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: But there are some 'hard dependencies' that have been missed (you can feel free to log these as bugs), such as mod_ldap prior to mod_auth_ldap, etc. Was "there shall never, ever be hard dependencies" discussed an

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [warn] (99)Cannot assign requested address: connect to listener on [::]:443

the parent process is running as root, the children are running as nobody. how can i tell if i have IPv6 stack installed?  how can i tell if i have IPv6 apache? its 2.0.x in phpinfo it says that openSSL is "OpenSSL/0.9.7a ipv6" -joe On 11/9/05, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are

[EMAIL PROTECTED] not navigate during downloading

Hi, There was an old apache server (on redhat), on which users can view and download files. I can navigate other pages during downloading. Now I updated all the php code and setup a new apache server on a new machine (Fedora Core 3). The behavior is changed. I am not sure if this is a real apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

Sorry, I thought that the LogLevel to debug was to find out why my config cache config settings might have been wrong. I will run some more tests as these four apache servers are going to have front a very large amount of web traffic, and I still need to size them so that they can handle the load,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DSO: does the order of LoadModule matter?

On Wednesday 09 November 2005 19:48, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > But there are some 'hard dependencies' that have been missed (you can feel > free to log these as bugs), such as mod_ldap prior to mod_auth_ldap, etc. Was "there shall never, ever be hard dependencies" discussed and resolved, or i

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with AuthPAM_Enabled' error in Apache2

Hi, I have been using Apache for some years now but am new to the list. I have been getting a problem with a fresh install of Apache 2.0.55 from the Debian unstable repositry. When I try to access a newly created Virtual host I get the following error: Internal Server Error The server encoun

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Win32 binary CANDIDATE 1.3.34 available for testing

Win32 1.3 users, since none of you are subscribed to the testers@httpd.apache.org, there has been no feedback to my request for the community to test the binary Win32 1.3.34 installer packages (.msi, and .exe). Therefore, one of two things is about to happen: either; a few of you will subscrib

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

On 11/9/05, Matthew R. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there anything out there that will help me verify cache hits and misses? I thought I answered that: > > Change LogLevel to debug and look in the error log to determine if > > mod_cache is active. (You can also log the "Age" HTTP Re

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help with Location directive

Hi, I'm setting up a FC4 server with Apache2 to host svn + trac. I'd like to have the following URLs: Trac home: http://projects.example.com Individual Trac projects: http://projects.example.com/project1 http://projects.example.com/project2 SVN home: http://projects.robinbowes.com/repos Indiv

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3 and OpenSSL

Simon Irwin wrote: What I've really been looking for is some kind of statement that OpenSSL version X is only compatible with mod_ssl version X (and later). Like I said before, I know that Apache and mod_ssl are closely tied together, but have never seen anything that notes the 'dependencies' b

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [warn] (99)Cannot assign requested address: connect to listener on [::]:443

Are you starting as root? (it's a privilaged port). Do you have the IPv6 stack installed? Is this an IPv6 build of httpd? Joe A wrote: noone has seen this before? On 10/26/05, *Joe A* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I noticed these entries in my Apache2 error_log fi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DSO: does the order of LoadModule matter?

James Benson wrote: Yes I think I remember seeing something about that in the apache docs, the order it ships with should not be changed! That was true of 1.3.x (the order of all the hooks was controlled by the AddModule sequence, or if ClearModule was not invoked, the original load order.) In

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

Joshua, I believe I found the error of my ways about an hour after this post. I miss-read the documentation in regards to the CacheEnable setting. I initially read this as to the physical location on the file system that contains the items I want cached. I was wondering why the example had "Cach

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Defunct CGI processes

Any advice at all with regards to this issue? Any more information that I can provide? steve On 11/7/05, Marple Huckleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Plain text please... > > My apologies, I didn't notice that gmail was sending in HTML. > > > This type of problem is impossible to analyse w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess apparently ignored when host accessed by IP

On 11/9/05, Peter Darling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello users. > > I am having trouble with a server where the .htaccess file directives > are ignored when the host is accessed by the IP number. If accessed > via the domainname, .htaccess directives are fully functional. > According to diff,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proper config for suexec and maintain chroot'ed FTP?

On 11/9/05, John Goggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, suexec still checks that the file is owned by the user trying to run > it, correct? Therefore, is doing a document root of /home (or even / and > ignoring the doc root check for that matter) that insecure/dangerous if it > only allows

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2 configuration "present but cannot be compiled" errors

On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to compile Apache 2 because I'm in a situation where I can't use a > pre-compiled release. Unfortunately I've got no experience with compiling > software at all so I'm hoping you guys can help me out a bit, assuming this > is the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Using suexec to let users modify their vacation

On Wednesday 09 November 2005 01:46, Laurent Blume wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm sure this has been done before, but I can't get relevant hits on > AltaVista or Google... > > I need to have a web interface to let users modify their vacation > message on the mail server in the intranet. They'll authen

[EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess apparently ignored when host accessed by IP

Hello users. I am having trouble with a server where the .htaccess file directives are ignored when the host is accessed by the IP number. If accessed via the domainname, .htaccess directives are fully functional. According to diff, other than IP numbers, this server has an identical httpd.conf

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_rewrite and mod_proxy

the bad URLs (http://external.address.com/html/...), although correctly redirected, aren't updated in the browser address bar (I'd like them to become http://external.address.com/newsite/html/...). Any idea how I could correct that ? I would guess that the browser is using the original URI for t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_rewrite and mod_proxy

LECONTE Laurent ROSI/SICOR wrote: Actually, writing my last mail gave me an idea : I scratched the ProxyPass directive altogether, and added a 'dummy' Rewrite for the correctly-written URLs. Therefore my conf now looks like this : RewriteRule ^/newsite/(.*) http://internal.address.com/newsite/

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache2/mod_ssl

Laurent, thank you so much for your answer. Yes, the mod_ssl was compiled as static. After adding shared in configure everything works fine. Susan - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. Se

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_rewrite and mod_proxy

Actually, writing my last mail gave me an idea : I scratched the ProxyPass directive altogether, and added a 'dummy' Rewrite for the correctly-written URLs. Therefore my conf now looks like this : RewriteRule ^/newsite/(.*) http://internal.address.com/newsite/$1 [P,L] RewriteRule ^/html/(.*) ht

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_rewrite and mod_proxy

Laurent - did you test whether mod_rewrite will work on any requests if you remove the ProxyPass directives? it would be good to find out if the rewrite engine is basically working for you. if you can prove the rewrite engine works, perhaps you could avoid using ProxyPass/ProxyPassReverse altoge

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3 and OpenSSL

Each of the versions of Apache/mod_ssl/OpenSSL that I'm using have been periodically updated with essential security updates (so while it's Apache 1.3.12 as a baseline, it's not quite that ancient). However, it can be hard to tell exactly *which* patches have been applied. You're completely rig

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_rewrite and mod_proxy

Hello all, I've configured an Apache 2.0 instance to work as a reverse proxy, listening on external.address.com and redirecting to internal.address.com. The relevant lines of the httpd.conf file are : Listen external.address.com:80 ProxyPass / http://internal.address.com/ ProxyPassReverse / h

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [warn] (99)Cannot assign requested address: connect to listener on [::]:443

noone has seen this before?On 10/26/05, Joe A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I noticed these entries in my Apache2 error_log file this evening.  I would greatly appreciate it if someone could fill me in as to what it means. [Wed Oct 26 19:49:37 2005] [warn] (99)Cannot assign requested address: connec

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proper config for suexec and maintain chroot'ed FTP?

Joshua Slive wrote: This has not changed between 1.3 and 2.0. suexec always requires all non-userdir files to be under a compile-time configured document root. It must just be that the docrot you had configured for 1.3 contained all the directories. You can recompile suexec to set its docroot

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proper config for suexec and maintain chroot'ed FTP?

On 11/9/05, John Goggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I seem unable to find a way to do the same thing properly under Apache v2.0 > with suexec2's requirement that the files be in the docroot. It does not use > the docroot of the virtual host -- but uses the default/main docroot of > /var/www. T

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3 and OpenSSL

Plain text please... This basically amounts to asking whether the API for openssl 0.9.8a is backwards compatible as far as 0.9.5a - that is, there are various function calls in mod_ssl 2.6.6 which expect to be understood by the OpenSSL library. If the interface to the library has changed at all

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Proper config for suexec and maintain chroot'ed FTP?

I recently went from Apache v1.x to v2.0.54. Most things went fine, but I am having trouble finding the proper way to configure things for suexec support while still maintaining the filesystem the way I would like it. As an example, say I host acmecorp.dom as a virtual host and they want to

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3 and OpenSSL

Hi All - I'm using a very old version of Apache - 1.3.12 and mod_ssl 2.6.6.  For historical reasons I cannot upgrade to newer versions. However, I may soon need to upgrade my OpenSSL version from 0.9.5a to 0.9.8a.  I know this is a strange position to be in. So I have a couple of questions.  Doe

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

On 11/9/05, Matthew R. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking to set up some caching apache servers to offload commonly > accessed > static content. We had been using IBM's WebSphere Edge Components 5.0.2 until > we started experiancing issues where the ibmproxy process would constant

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2 configuration "present but cannot be compiled" errors

Hi, I'm trying to compile Apache 2 because I'm in a situation where I can't use a pre-compiled release. Unfortunately I've got no experience with compiling software at all so I'm hoping you guys can help me out a bit, assuming this is the right place to ask for this. I'm running Solaris 8 (Ultr

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2, mod_python and nss_ldap: Coredump

Hi I got a new FreeBSD 6 box. Rebuilt kernel and world 2 hours ago (against RELENG_6), so it should be pretty new. Im trying to have apache 2.0.55, mod_python 3.1.4 and nss_ldap 239, all the latest from ports. The problem I have is this: If i have LoadModule python_module libexec/apa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache2/mod_ssl

Susan Roesner RZ wrote: I am using Solaris 10, apache 2.0.55 and openssl 0.9.7i to compile apache with mod_ssl and mod_so using the following commands ./configure --prefix=/path/to/apache --with-ssl=/opt/web/ssl097i --enable-ss l --enable-rewrite --enable-so The compilation/install proccess was

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache2/mod_ssl

Hello List, I am using Solaris 10, apache 2.0.55 and openssl 0.9.7i to compile apache with mod_ssl and mod_so using the following commands ./configure --prefix=/path/to/apache --with-ssl=/opt/web/ssl097i --enable-ss l --enable-rewrite --enable-so The compilation/install proccess was fine. After

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using suexec to let users modify their vacation

Hello all, I'm sure this has been done before, but I can't get relevant hits on AltaVista or Google... I need to have a web interface to let users modify their vacation message on the mail server in the intranet. They'll authenticate themselves first, of course, using mod_ldap. It's a regula

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy and SSI from Back-End Apache

Hi, Replying to my own post for reason of the problem and a typical solution. On 11/9/05, Devendra Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/9/05, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: On 11/8/05, Devendra Singh < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> But, the problem is that when I try to access > http://d