Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting Alert on apachectl start preventing Apache2 from starting

2005-09-21 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/21/05, Boysenberry Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm getting the following error when I try to start up my apache server: > > > [Wed Sep 21 15:19:41 2005] [alert] (EAI 7)No address associated with > nodename: mod_unique_id: unable to find IPv4 address of "pod.local" > Configuration Failed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting Alert on apachectl start preventing Apache2 from starting

2005-09-21 Thread Boysenberry Payne
I'm getting the following error when I try to start up my apache server: [Wed Sep 21 15:19:41 2005] [alert] (EAI 7)No address associated with nodename: mod_unique_id: unable to find IPv4 address of "pod.local" Configuration Failed How can I correct it, or troubleshoot why it's happening even.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.54 creating "Bad request" on POST over 8kb

2005-09-21 Thread Nick Kew
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 17:15, Joshua Slive wrote: > On 9/21/05, Tuomas J Rinta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This was because my app wasn't sending a Content-Length-header and my > > browser was. Apparently Apache can't handle the POST request if it is > > ~8kb or over AND it doesn't hav

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.54 creating "Bad request" on POST over 8kb

2005-09-21 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/21/05, Tuomas J Rinta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Running Apache 2.0.54 on Debian Linux. > > A while ago I posted a message here asking about "request failed: error > reading the headers" which was caused by Apache being unable to read > POST-requests that were large. I suspected that this wa

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.54 creating "Bad request" on POST over 8kb

2005-09-21 Thread Tuomas J Rinta
Running Apache 2.0.54 on Debian Linux. A while ago I posted a message here asking about "request failed: error reading the headers" which was caused by Apache being unable to read POST-requests that were large. I suspected that this was Not My Fault(tm) as it was mostly with the users using a

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ldaps auth

2005-09-21 Thread Craig L. Ching
Just to let people that have been following the mod_auth_ldap problems, my build is now working. Here is a script (it's just a dumb script to capture my build procedure) I used to build openssl (0.9.7g), openldap (2.2.28), and httpd (2.0.54) on Solaris 8: CC=/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc GNU_TAR=`which

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEED URGENT HELP: Porting to Apache 1.3.x module to Apache2.0

2005-09-21 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/21/05, Bankar, Swati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > Am looking for a crisp and complete document to port an Apache 1.3 module > (which is a server plugin) to Apache 2.0 module. > > There isn't any useful document that I could get from anywhere in net. There are several documents

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Httpd processes are not dying

2005-09-21 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/21/05, Mishra, Pawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have following output from the mod_status. It shows 16 processes. > Observe that only the five processes have PID's (MaxSpareServer is 5). > Do the other ones exist too in the memory? Is it a bug? Check the "M" column. Since there i

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite/mod_auth_* : Trying to use REMOTE_USER env

2005-09-21 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/20/05, dphillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to use Apache to act as a proxy/reverse-proxy which will > authenticate the users, update the header with the authetication > information and then forward the request an Application Web Server. > > > I'm using the mod_auth_sspi t

[EMAIL PROTECTED] NEED URGENT HELP: Porting to Apache 1.3.x module to Apache2.0

2005-09-21 Thread Bankar, Swati
Title: NEED URGENT HELP: Porting to Apache 1.3.x module to Apache2.0 Hi all, Am looking for a crisp and complete document to port an Apache 1.3 module (which is a server plugin) to Apache 2.0 module. There isn’t any useful document that I could get from anywhere in net. This is kind of urg

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [apache-modules] ldapS auth]

2005-09-21 Thread Dmitriy Kirhlarov
I test this patch. It work for me. But little issue finded. When you use DER or BASE64 packed CAcert you must describe it as BASE64_FILE. - Forwarded message from Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 17:12 +0100, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 05:51:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to compile to change LimitRequestLine default value

2005-09-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 9/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Help!!! > > it does not want work!! > > > > debian sarge > > Server version: Apache/2.0.54 > > Server built: Sep 13 2005 10:08:02 > > > > I edit my own layout and edit in include/httpd.h this line: > > #ifndef DEFAULT_LIMIT_REQUEST_LI

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NFS Logging

2005-09-21 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: Dean Maunder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Mittwoch, 21. September 2005 00:08 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NFS Logging > > > Hi, > I have 3 load balanced Apache webserver and I am considering using an > NFS on another server to