It was thus said that the Great [EMAIL PROTECTED] once stated:
>
> It was thus said that the Great [EMAIL PROTECTED] once stated:
> >
> > Hi,
> > On Linux, can we make Apache (2.0.50) re-read and apply new
> > configuration (new virtual host, changed IP of a existing virtual host, etc)
> > w
Hello,I am using Apache 2.0.53 and I want to
use module mod_cern_meta.I did following settings in configuration
file,
MetaDir .MetaFiles onMetaSuffix
.metaand access the local URL : http://localhost:8080/test/index.html
.
I put .meta file which contain HTTP headers that
are expected to be
Title: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Restart without disconnecting clients
It disconnects the ssl connections.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:10 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Restart witho
apachectl -k graceful
The USR1 or graceful signal causes the parent process to advise the children
to exit after their current request (or to exit immediately if they're not
serving anything). The parent re-reads its configuration files and re-opens
its log files. As each child dies off the parent
It was thus said that the Great [EMAIL PROTECTED] once stated:
>
> Hi,
> On Linux, can we make Apache (2.0.50) re-read and apply new
> configuration (new virtual host, changed IP of a existing virtual host, etc)
> without disconnecting the existing clients for whom there is no
> configuration
Title: Restart without disconnecting clients
Hi,
On Linux, can we make Apache (2.0.50) re-read and apply new configuration (new virtual host, changed IP of a existing virtual host, etc) without disconnecting the existing clients for whom there is no configuration change? same is needed fo
By default, will any of the core modules in Apache 2.0.50 showed the the
error "Due to the presence of characters known to be used in cross site
scripting attacks, access is forbidden. This web site does not allow Urls
which might include embedded HTML tags"???
If yes, what are these modules a
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 23:33, dAniel hAhler wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I've just discovered that adding
> AddHandler php-fastcgi .xxx
> will also parse files like test.xxx.txt and test.xxx.foobar.
Sounds like multiviews. Look it up in the docs.
--
Nick Kew
I do apologize ... as someone just pointed out to me, I failed to state
what software I was running ... this is with Apache 2.0.54 ...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I've searched google, and find the question asked, but never answered ... so
I ask here ...
What 'file or di
I think you should rely on your application with cookies - it will be
easy to handle.
- Aman
Mike Koponick wrote:
Hello,
I have a situation on my internal website where I don’t want users to
be able to use an extended URL.
Example, _http://www.example.com/test.html/pic.jpg_
If they try to
On 7/12/05, Mike Koponick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a situation on my internal website where I don't want users to be
> able to use an extended URL.
>
> Example, http://www.example.com/test.html/pic.jpg
>
> If they try to go to that link, I would like to redirect t
On 7/12/05, dAniel hAhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I've just discovered that adding
> AddHandler php-fastcgi .xxx
> will also parse files like test.xxx.txt and test.xxx.foobar.
>
> I think it should just use the handler if the extension is the last part of
> the URI. Spe
Title: Redirect?
Hello,
I have a situation on my internal website where I don’t want users to be able to use an extended URL.
Example, http://www.example.com/test.html/pic.jpg
If they try to go to that link, I would like to redirect them to http://www.example.com/
So in other words, if th
Hello everybody,
I've just discovered that adding
AddHandler php-fastcgi .xxx
will also parse files like test.xxx.txt and test.xxx.foobar.
I think it should just use the handler if the extension is the last part of
the URI. Speaking regexp it should build a pattern like "$".
I've set this hand
>
>> Do you have a firewall blocking SSL port?
>
> not yet... it's a box i'm setting up now...
i tried again - same result...
the only difference between the old 1.3.x apache build on the machine and
the new 2.0.5x is these two lines below in the ssl conf section.
when i start the new one i get
Kunle Olusanya wrote:
> I installed Apache 2.0.54 and Tomcat 5.0.28 on different servers and I
> am trying to configure them to work together so that client browsers can
> send their requests via Apache.
You need to install and configure the JK connector. There are many
how-tos about that on the n
Hi all,
I installed Apache 2.0.54 and Tomcat 5.0.28 on different servers and I
am trying to configure them to work together so that client browsers
can send their requests via Apache.
Can anyone please provide me the instruction on how to do this? I am a newbie to Apache.
Thanks a lot for your h
Well granted I have not touched cd since v6.0 I am not sure about the current
one. But
back then there was an internal you could use (port 8080 I think) that could be
used
without installing any other web server. it was not meant for production,
but rather
testing.
d
-- Original
Hi Owen,
I commented out the IndexIgnore line and had the same result.
Then I had this crazy idea:
# cp big_file.iso big_file2.iso
and now 'big_file.iso' still doesn't appear but 'big_file2.iso' does appear
I checked the permissions and they look the same (both 744).
The same trick did no
Thanks for the advice, I was secretly
hoping it was nativly implemented thought L
De :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 11
juillet 2005 15:53
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache, LDAP AUTH and directory access
H
is there a built in cf webserver? i thought it ran as
a cartrdige. anyway, the cfadministrator does not show
up when i turn apache services off, so it seems that
the cfadministrator is using apache. i'm still
confused about this. wondering if i should rebuild the
connector, or if this is a differe
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 12. Juli 2005 14:33
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] some files not showing in directory index
>
>
> Hello all at apache,
>
> I'm new on the list.
Hello,
Now I was able to complete the install of PHP4
but now when I try to launch appache I have the following:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache2/modules/libphp4.so into server: rtld:
0712-001 Symbol ologof was referenced\n from module
/usr/local/apache2/modules/libphp4.so(), but a runtime de
Hello all at apache,
I'm new on the list.
Some of the files present in the html directories of my server do not appear in
the directory listing produced by apache (httpd 2.0.xx).
I have a small ".txt" file that apears and some big (600MB) ".iso" files that do
not appear in the index returned by
Please don't change the "Reply To" field (you changed it so that replies go to
you personally and not to the list. This defeats the purpose of the archive and
wastes people's time if they post back on a thread that's already been
answered).
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Browne [
I've searched google, and find the question asked, but never answered ...
so I ask here ...
What 'file or directory' is it trying to work with, that it isn't finding?
This is 2.0.54 running on FreeBSD and built via FreeBSD ports, on a
FreeBSD 4.x machine ...
Thanks ...
Marc G. Fourn
Forking new processes does take system resources and may slow down handling of
HTTP requests. If you constantly observe that new Apache processes are forked
(and that idle Apache processes die), you may want to do something about it.
Otherwise not.
One strategy may be to set StartServer to a va
27 matches
Mail list logo
