> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2005 19:02
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not Authenticating
>
>
> I'm trying to implement Basic authentication for my user
> directory on m
You can try to check your log files and if you have iptables with some
logging setup perhaps there is something in there.
your biggest priority firstly should be to lockdown this system.
is firewall on?
have u disabled unrequired services
are your file permissions set to give access to the wrong
How would one go about finding out how this system was compromised and how
to fix it.
I had two other sites that were damaged too.
-Original Message-
From: H. Carter Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 2:01 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROT
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:27:06AM +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
> Erm, if the CGI is proxied, then all you can determine is whether
> a proxy request will be executed. What the backend does internally
> is its business.
>
> Maybe what you really want is to make your proxy into a 404
> errordocument?
B
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 01:47:45PM -0700, Govindarajulu, Arun wrote:
>
> I liked Noah's idea, but used it in a slightly different fashion.
[snip]
> This is what I have used. Instead of converting the query string to an
> all-path request, I am preserving the query string, but inserting a
> uniqu
I liked Noah's idea, but used it in a slightly different fashion.
Rewriting a query string to an all-path type of request is not a
solution for two reasons.
1. You do not want to change the context/query string when handing out
to tomcat.
2. It gets tricky as you mentioned, or even not possible w
My first post seems not be passed..
Hi everybody,
I am using the pgsql mod from http://www.giuseppetanzilli.it/mod_auth_pgsql2/
My application seems to connect to the database.
However, my passwords are encrypted in md5 and encoded in base64. I
don't know how to configure my apache conf.
I have
luthien [/opt/SUNWwbsvr/docs] # gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.4.3/specs
Configured with: /builds/sfw10-gate/usr/src/cmd/gcc/gcc-3.4.3/configure
--prefix=/usr/sfw --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas --with-gnu-as --with-
ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld --enable-language
Craig, Steve,
I did both "make clean" and "gmake clean" and now on fresh set up execute
"configure" command.
Configure runs fine but on giving the command "gmake" I am still getting the
error but it seems the gmake compiled a little extra than earlier.
Steve,
Please you tell me t
In general, you should always 'make clean' (or 'make realclean' or 'make
veryclean', if they exist) when re-running a compile. That is, run 'make
clean'
to clean up leftovers from other compilation attempts, then re-run the same
configure command, and then re-run make (or 'gmake' in this case)
I was able to build 1.3.33 on my sol10 system with no such error
did you install the sol10 patches?
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 00:29 +0530, Rahul Kohli wrote:
> Craig,
>
> The results of gmake are also same (given below)
>
> # gmake
> ===> src
> gmake[1]: Entering directory `/test/self/INs/apache
It appears that you are correct ... thank you. v 2.0.48
-Original Message-
From: Aman Raheja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 1:14 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem moving websites
It is always appreciated to know what apache vers
Craig,
The results of gmake are also same (given below)
# gmake
===> src
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/test/self/INs/apache_1.3.33'
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/test/self/INs/apache_1.3.33/src'
===> src/regex
gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
<=== src/regex
===> src/os/unix
gcc -c -I.
The command name is gmake, not make. :)
Craig
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Rahul Kohli wrote:
> Craig,
>
>
>
> Now I have installed gmake ver 3.80 even after this the error while executing
> the "make" command remains the same.
>
>
>
> # make
>
> ===> src
>
> make[1]: Entering directory `/tes
Craig,
Now I have installed gmake ver 3.80 even after this the error while executing
the "make" command remains the same.
# make
===> src
make[1]: Entering directory `/test/self/INs/apache_1.3.33'
make[2]: Entering directory `/test/self/INs/apache_1.3.33/src'
===> src/regex
make[3]: N
It is always appreciated to know what apache version you are running and
on what platform.
As far as this message - it looks more like an intruder got in the box
and put up this page, unless it is your default page.
check the index file in your htdocs - it could be compromised system
situation.
Title: Address re-writing with mod_jk2
Hi all. I am using mod_jk2 to interface Apache to a Tomcat server. Currently, in order to access the application in tomcat, my users must specify www.mydomain.com/myapplication . I would like to somehow re-write incoming URL's such that a simple www.m
I'm trying to move some websites from one host to another. I thought I had
the hosts setup the same but when I try to view the site on the new host I
get the following message:
core-project owned your b0x.. SAVE YOUR BOX
This sounds horrible.
I've checked vhosts.conf, permissions, etc but I'
Might
be a better idea to write a bug report to http://issues.apache.org/ and attach a
patch.
-ascs
From: Tejas Sanghavi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:41
PMTo: users@httpd.apache.orgSubject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 64-bit
problem
Hi,
I am porting the apache 2.0.
On Thursday 12 May 2005 10:12, Craig Dunigan wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2005, Richard Crawford wrote:
> > I'm trying to implement Basic authentication for my user directory on my
> > server, but it's bombing on me. When I go to the protected site, I'm
> > prompted for a username and password as expec
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Richard Crawford wrote:
> I'm trying to implement Basic authentication for my user directory on my
> server, but it's bombing on me. When I go to the protected site, I'm
> prompted for a username and password as expected; however, the user is not
> authenticated even if th
I'm trying to implement Basic authentication for my user directory on my
server, but it's bombing on me. When I go to the protected site, I'm
prompted for a username and password as expected; however, the user is not
authenticated even if they put in the proper username and password.
I'm using
Whoops, I didn't realize you were using Sun's make. Go get gmake (GNU make)
and
use that instead. Sun's 'make' is notorious for its troubles with gcc.
Craig
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Rahul Kohli wrote:
>
> In order to ensure this is not permission issue I have done the same using
> root user.
Actually I am not using one. I am really just trying
to find out right now. Perhaps I should point out
that I am looking at the modules ftp_proxy. See
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_proxy_ftp.html.
I am assuming that this module provides FTP
functionality. Perhaps what it does instead
In order to ensure this is not permission issue I have done the same using root
user. Also checked for Ctrl-M characters and the files are perfectly fine.
Now I am not getting the errors when running "configure" command but on execute
the "make" the error still remains the same (shown below)
Hello
My company is interested in a commercial support contract
for apache/tomcat
Can anyone make some suggestions? I've been in touch with
these companies thus far:
Covalent
Cooper & McGregor
IBM
JBOSS
--
Thanks
-
A lot of peop
Dunno, looks like a straightforward file/directory permissions problem to me.
Make sure you have write privileges to both the source and destination
directories, or run configure and make under sudo.
--
Craig
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Harish Sundaram wrote:
> Check whether Ctrl-M characters got tra
Hi everybody,
I am using the pgsql mod from http://www.giuseppetanzilli.it/mod_auth_pgsql2/
My application seems to connect to the database.
However, my passwords are encrypted in md5 and encoded in base64. I
don't know how to configure my apache conf.
I have :
#AuthType Basic
I am having a
problem displaying graphics on apache 2.0.54.I am only getting half of
the graphic when accessing the webpageany
ideaswareaglehosting.dnsalias.net is the webpage the problem is
not the dynamic dns as I can duplicate the problemusing direct ip address
also.it is like the se
Check whether Ctrl-M characters got transferred in your code when u
transferred the files on to the Solaris machine.
If that is the case, transfer file in ascii mode.and try.
Thanks and Regards,
Harish.
x 5337.
-Original Message-
From: Rahul Kohli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thurs
Hi All,
I am trying to install Apache 1.3.33 on Solaris 10 machine but am facing
certain issues while doing so.
The gcc version on my machine is "gcc version 3.4.3
(csl-sol210-3_4-branch+sol_rpath)". The steps and the error faced are mentioned
below.
1) ./configure --prefix=/test/self/apach
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:48:56PM +0100, ed elliott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I add a virtual host to apache, is there any way that I can get it to work
> without restarting apache?
>
> What do ISP's do when they create a new domain - surely they dont restart
> apache and cause all the other domai
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Cheney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have found that an 'apachectl restart' is not enough for some reason
> when adding a new SSL VHost, but rather you need to stop then
> startssl.
A graceful sends a SIGUSR1 to the parent apache process, causing it to
* Josh Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0540 12:40]:
> I have found that an 'apachectl restart' is not enough for some reason
> when adding a new SSL VHost, but rather you need to stop then startssl.
>
> Just as a side note.
Sounds like a problem with apachectl not picking up '-DSSL'.
--
'Everybody
Hi there,
When I use the following combination:
Apache 2.049
Linux (SuSe 9.1)
mod_deflate
and a zip file is served to a IE6 client, the file can not be used
anymore. (I get an error by win zip claiming that it is not a valid zip
archive)
I tried to suppress that mod_deflate by the following rule
> -Original Message-
> From: Dick Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You make it sound as though it's still a problem over SSL -
> is that what you mean?
It can't be snooped but it's still vulnerable.
Each login attempt is regarded as a unique HTTP request and so is handled as
fast
I have found that an 'apachectl restart' is not enough for some reason
when adding a new SSL VHost, but rather you need to stop then startssl.
Just as a side note.
Boyle Owen wrote:
> Plain text please...
>
> This will happen if there is an error in the new config. The safe sequence of
> events
* Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0523 12:23]:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: K Anand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2005 10:46
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication question
> >
> >
> > Thanx...I used ethereal to
> -Original Message-
> From: K Anand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2005 10:46
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication question
>
>
> Thanx...I used ethereal to see the flow of data between browser and
> server...one point
Plain text please...
This will happen if there is an error in the new config. The safe sequence of
events should be:
apachectl configtest
if (Syntax OK)
apachectl graceful
else
fix httpd.conf and try again
Rgds,
Owen Boyle
Disclaimer
Bediako George wrote:
> Hello Dick,
>
> Thanks for the speedy reply. I am aware that Apache is
> not an FTP server. I did notice that Apache provides
> an FTP module.
No it doesn't.
There are a couple of third-party FTP modules for Apache.
If you're using one of them, what does the developer's
Keith Bare wrote:
> It seems like there SHOULD be some way to use a subrequest to
> determine if a CGI would be executed.
Erm, if the CGI is proxied, then all you can determine is whether
a proxy request will be executed. What the backend does internally
is its business.
Maybe what you really w
* Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0507 09:07]:
>
> The first time the client requests a resource in a protected realm, it
> doesn't know it is protected so makes a plain request. The server responds
> with a 401 Unauthorized. The client then pops up a password window and
> captures the username
* Sandeep Gaikwad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0558 09:58]:
> Hello Anand,
>Please try by updating the line AllowOverride None by
>AllowOverride AuthConfig or AllowOverride All
>
> Regards,
> Sandeep
Guys, read the mails before posting replies, ok?
What you suggest would enable .htaccess loading
As I mentioned previously I use pthread, but I wonder for what reasons the
default for Solaris changed from pthread to fcntl between 2.0.49 and 2.0.52. Is
it for stability or performance reasons? What are the pros and cons?
Does anyone know?
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Christian F
Hi all,
can anyone help me?
I'm using Apache 1.3.33 as a Reverse Proxy and all is fine but I have a feature in my site on the backserver that sends in "push" some little datas, those are packets from 2 Bytes to 100 Bytes pe, and till the buffer is not full my client does not receive these datas.
Load-balancing/failover
Beware
of restart/graceful. Sometimes the server does not restart and
dies.
-ascs
From: ed elliott
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 5:49
PMTo: users@httpd.apache.orgSubject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] adding
virtual hosts without restarting ??
H
Hi,
I can see the problem is a rights issue. I created a dummy User and set
the home directory 777 and the pages can be viewed.
So what is the appropriate access needed to give access to these user
directories? it seems funny to me to force a the rights to be loosened
for this.
Perhaps I set u
Hello Anand,
Please try by updating the line AllowOverride None by
AllowOverride AuthConfig or AllowOverride All
Regards,
Sandeep
K Anand wrote:
Hi all,
I have a very basic question regarding authentication on apache...I have in
my httpd.conf a section like below :
AuthType Basic
AuthN
Thanx...I used ethereal to see the flow of data between browser and
server...one point though...I was able to see my password in clear text in
ethereal. So it is possible that it could be open to the public ??
Anand
- Original Message -
From: "Boyle Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Th
Do you have load mod_jk and mount the jsp_examples context?
regards Dietmar
"Rehman Adil (KI/EAB)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> am 12.05.2005 10:12:17
Bitte antworten an users@httpd.apache.org
An:
Kopie:
Thema: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Urgent Please : Loadbalancing Tomcat using Apache
Hi,
I am tryin
Hi,
I am trying to use Apache 2.0 on windows to load balance three tomcat workers
using mod_jk(mod_jk_1.2.6_2.0.50.dll).
When I browse the URL (http://localhost/jsp-examples/index.jsp), Apache does
not forward the request as I get the following in the Apache log file.
File does not exist: C:
> -Original Message-
> From: K Anand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2005 05:52
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication question
>
>
> you didn't understand what I was asking...The config I have
> included is
> working ..I
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Winfield-Blum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2005 04:33
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with User Directories
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> My first time sending to this mail list :)
> I am setting up u
54 matches
Mail list logo
