I added the PR for the trailing list edge case here:
https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2180
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 7:12 AM Paul King wrote:
>
> Actually, there is another edge case with chop that I would also like
> to modify since we are making a change anyway.
>
> Even once the original so
Actually, there is another edge case with chop that I would also like
to modify since we are making a change anyway.
Even once the original source of elements is exhausted, we continue
"chopping" for each asked for size but give an empty list in such
cases.
assert ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'].chop(1
Hi there,
> On 4. 4. 2025, at 23:09, Mattias Reichel wrote:
> I don't see a problem making a breaking change in a major version update.
Well it's always somewhat at the inconvenient side for us who maintain a big
codebase.
On the other hand, when it's easy to find and fix all the places where
I don't see a problem making a breaking change in a major version update.
Thanks for the thorough explanation!
/Mattias
Den fre 4 apr. 2025 kl 17:57 skrev Per Nyfelt :
> I think the change is good and the right one. Consistency of API will
> bring a much better benefit in the long run compared s
I think the change is good and the right one. Consistency of API will
bring a much better benefit in the long run compared so the initial
discomfort to adapt.
Regards,
Per
On 4/4/25 13:41, Paul King wrote:
Hi folks,
I am seeking feedback on making a breaking change for the DGM chop
method (
