Thanks for the input Schalk,
Can anyone else indicate if this looks like a bug, or an intended
behavior? If so, I can submit the bug.
Gerald R. Wiltse
jerrywil...@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Schalk Cronjé wrote:
> The interesting thing about this for me is that for
>
> bind
The interesting thing about this for me is that for
binding.with {
println cow
}
the generated code is
public static java.lang.Object action(Foo $self) {
return $self .binding.with({
return $self.println( $self .cow)
}.rehydrate($self, $self, $self))
This example returns the error inside the with closure:
"No such property: cow for class:Bar"
It seems .with() in a trait does not resolve the way it "normally" does.
trait Foo {
def action() {
println binding.cow
binding.with {
println cow
}
}
