FYI, here is the poll result from
twitter(https://twitter.com/daniel_sun/status/990544485196091395):
19 votes in total,
58% +1,
42% 0,
0% -1
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Users-f329450.html
On 01.05.2018 19:27, Daniel Sun wrote:
Hi Jochen,
Supporting Java-like array is to copy & paste code in Java easily,
e.g. experiment Java code in groovy console :-)
I really don't think Groovy has to support everything from Java.
I agree. If we could improve the compatibility be
Hi Jochen,
Supporting Java-like array is to copy & paste code in Java easily,
e.g. experiment Java code in groovy console :-)
> I really don't think Groovy has to support everything from Java.
I agree. If we could improve the compatibility between Groovy and
Java, it would be good fo
Oh,and one important point...
I really don't think Groovy has to support everything from Java.
On 01.05.2018 17:20, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 01.05.2018 16:26, MG wrote:
I think we should do this, for cases where the rewards of adhering to
idiomatic Groovy are less obvious or it might be mis
On 01.05.2018 16:26, MG wrote:
I think we should do this, for cases where the rewards of adhering to
idiomatic Groovy are less obvious or it might be missed that there even
_is_ an idiomatic Groovy way to do things (I have heard some people were
not aware that array initialization without "as"
A codenarc rule would be a great first option.
Cheers,
mg
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Paul King mailto:pa...@asert.com.au>>
Datum: 30.04.18 00:29 (GMT+01:00)
An: users@groovy.apache.org <mailto:users@groovy.apache.org&
I have created the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GROOVY/issues/GROOVY-8566
Feel free to comment on the "less lenient for static compilation case ?"
question:
"An additonal question would be, whether in the static case the
automatic conversion of the RHS expression to fit the L
he Nachricht
> Von: Paul King
> Datum: 30.04.18 01:51 (GMT+01:00)
> An: users@groovy.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [Poll] About supporting Java-like array
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 9:10 AM, mg wrote:
>
>> I would propose the Groovy compiler issue a warnin
avoid Groovy becoming a Babylonian-syntax-language
like e.g. Ruby...
Cheers,mg
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Paul King
Datum: 30.04.18 01:51 (GMT+01:00) An: users@groovy.apache.org Betreff: Re:
[Poll] About supporting Java-like array
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 9:10 AM, mg
ng
Datum: 30.04.18 05:18 (GMT+01:00) An: users@groovy.apache.org Betreff: Re:
[Poll] About supporting Java-like array
That sounds like a limitation we'd like to remove when using @CompileStatic.
Want to create a Jira?
Cheers, Paul.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:39 PM, MG wrote:
That sounds like a limitation we'd like to remove when using
@CompileStatic. Want to create a Jira?
Cheers, Paul.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:39 PM, MG wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I did a quick check and it works with dynamic Groovy, but is rejected
> under static compilation:
>
> @Test@Ignorevoid a
Hi Daniel,
I did a quick check and it works with dynamic Groovy, but is rejected
under static compilation:
@Test @Ignore void arrayFromListLiteral() {
int[] a0 = [1,2,3]
int[][] aa0 = [[1,2,3],[4,5,6]]
int[][][] aaa0 = [[[1],[2],[3]],[[4],[5],[6]]]
int[][][] aaa1 = [[1,2,3],[4,5,6]]
Hi mg,
As far as I remember, two dimensional array like`int[][] a = [[1, 2,
3], [4, 5, 6]]` will go wrong in the Groovy style.
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Users-f329450.html
he Nachricht
> Von: Paul King
> Datum: 30.04.18 00:29 (GMT+01:00)
> An: users@groovy.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [Poll] About supporting Java-like array
>
> The preferred Groovy syntax would probably still remain:
>
> int[] fibs = [1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8]
>
> Che
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
> Von: Paul King
> Datum: 30.04.18 00:29 (GMT+01:00)
> An: users@groovy.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [Poll] About supporting Java-like array
>
> The preferred Groovy syntax would probably still remain:
>
> int[] fibs = [1, 1, 2
the Groovy compiler issue a warning to change the array
initialization from Java- to Groovy-style then...Cheers,mg
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Paul King
Datum: 30.04.18 00:29 (GMT+01:00) An: users@groovy.apache.org Betreff: Re:
[Poll] About supporting Java-like array
The prefer
Yes, what you suggested is supported and indeed the preferred way.
The `as int[]` is only needed if you have def at the front, e.g.:
def fibs = [1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8] as int[]
Cheers, Paul.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Keith Suderman wrote:
> I am always +1 on supporting Java syntax when pract
The preferred Groovy syntax would probably still remain:
int[] fibs = [1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8]
Cheers, Paul.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 7:17 AM, MG wrote:
> After thinking about this some more for the last weeks
> +1 with asterisk
> from my side:
>
> 1) I am always for being as Java compatible as possi
I am always +1 on supporting Java syntax when practical.
> On Apr 29, 2018, at 5:17 PM, MG wrote:
>
> 2) I feel { { } } being interpreted as an array containing an empty closure
> is confusing, i.e. not least surprise. I would rather not see it cut it so
> close with regards to what the Parr
After thinking about this some more for the last weeks
+1 with asterisk
from my side:
1) I am always for being as Java compatible as possible (though I see
that this might not be feasible in all cases in the future, due to Java
changing at a much faster pace and with more syntax changes now tha
+1
For completeness, I added some more details about the breaking changes and
workarounds into the issue - included below for easy reading.
Cheers, Paul.
=
Groovy currently "promotes" a singleton instance of an object into an array
for assignments, e.g.:
Integer[] nums = 42
ass
Hi all,
As we all know, Java array is one of features widely applied in Java
projects. In order to improve the compatibility with Java(Copy & Paste). The
PR[1] will make Groovy support java-like array and make the differences[2]
with Java less and less, e.g.
*One-Dimensional array*
```
Strin
22 matches
Mail list logo
