Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy 2.6 potential retirement to focus on Groovy 3.0

2018-06-13 Thread Eric Helgeson
Agree with option 3 as well. If you're stuck on pre jdk8 and have groovy 2.5 - that's a pretty good situation. JDK9/10/11+ compatibility is the direction the language needs to go. On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 8:19 AM sigzero wrote: > Option 3. > > You can always revisit the 2.6 branch if that becomes

Re: Alternative JVM with Groovy (Azul,...) ?

2018-03-08 Thread Eric Helgeson
on seaman but I do see the Java feature from zulu.org > ,so that is what you mean right ? thanks > > -- > Charles Monteiro > > > On March 8, 2018 at 9:06:01 AM, Eric Helgeson (erichelge...@gmail.com) > wrote: > > Hi, > > It used to be the case that OpenJDK and Orac

Re: Alternative JVM with Groovy (Azul,...) ?

2018-03-08 Thread Eric Helgeson
> -- > Charles Monteiro > > > On March 8, 2018 at 9:06:01 AM, Eric Helgeson (erichelge...@gmail.com) > wrote: > > Hi, > > It used to be the case that OpenJDK and OracleJDK had quite a few > differences in terms of performance and compatibility. But that is no >

Re: Alternative JVM with Groovy (Azul,...) ?

2018-03-08 Thread Eric Helgeson
ovy compatibility (they only mention Scala > explicitly on the web page)... > > Cheers, > mg > > > -- -Eric Helgeson