+1 to Paul's approach
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMNvOtQFro0
---
Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
http://andresalmiray.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray
--
What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator.
There are 10 types of people i
It's the kind of new feature (potentially wide impacting) that we have
created Groovy Enhancement Proposals for in the past. Most recently we have
just used well-fleshed out Jira issues with a GEP label.
I'm +1 for exploring the idea further but -1 for trying to implement a
small piece of the feat
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Jochen Theodorou
wrote:
>
> On 23.07.2017 17:21, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Speaking of pattern matching, there's Brian Goetz' proposal here, for
>> pattern matching for Java:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~briangoetz/amber/pattern-match.html
>> We shou
On 23.07.2017 17:21, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
[...]
Speaking of pattern matching, there's Brian Goetz' proposal here, for
pattern matching for Java:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~briangoetz/amber/pattern-match.html
We should also avoid offering a different syntax as to what might come
up in the J
Many people do also like that feature :-)
And it's good to have that conversation and discussion!
Guillaume
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Daniel Sun wrote:
> Because many people do not like the feature, it will not be implemented for
> the time being util we reach a consensus.
>
> P.S. It is
