Hi :)
Err, i think that was Paul's point!
That and further posts made me look-up Redhat version numbers in
DistroWatch;
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=redhat
The last release date of 5.2, "apollo", was October 1998 so there is a lot
of wriggle room there.
Walking away sounds diffic
On 11/24/2014 3:34 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
RHEL-5.11 is just a couple months old and is stable branch. It makes sense
that they wouldn't update it.
Redhat 5.0, code named "hurricane", is from 1997! Even if it's been
patched and updated then it sounds a little worrying.
...
I don't think it's
Hi :)
I hope that is "Redhat Enterprise Linux" rather than Redhat "hurricane" or
"apollo"!
RHEL-5.11 is just a couple months old and is stable branch. It makes sense
that they wouldn't update it.
Redhat 5.0, code named "hurricane", is from 1997! Even if it's been
patched and updated then it sou
On 23/11/14 02:25, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> Given the nature the information and their standing as a title authority,
I'm making a guess here, but that sentence implies that the firm not
only has to have current boundaries, but also former boundaries of the
property in question, and be able
(Kind of wandering off the mailing list's topic, but...)
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 21:25:17 -0500
"Eric S. Johansson" wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> No problem, I appreciate the input. Unfortunately, my experience
> with SQL over the past 30 years has taught me to stay away from SQL
> as far as absolutely poss
On Nov 22, 2014 5:53 PM, Paul wrote:
>
> I don't want to try and tell you your business, but I had a few
> thoughts on your mail:
No problems. You have some very good feedback which I appreciate and I couldn't
say much because I only had the roughest of conversations with this client.
It's st
On 23/11/14 09:53, Paul wrote:
I don't want to try and tell you your business, but I had a few
thoughts on your mail:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:18:43 -0500
Eric wrote:
On 11/16/2014 5:16 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
Do you have use cases?
I'm preping to talk to a real estate title authority.
I don't want to try and tell you your business, but I had a few
thoughts on your mail:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:18:43 -0500
Eric wrote:
>
> On 11/16/2014 5:16 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > Do you have use cases?
> I'm preping to talk to a real estate title authority. they have
> 60+years of
On 11/22/2014 10:34 AM, Rob Jasper wrote:
> I used to work for Bell Labs, and they had as standard (!) perforation the US
> 3 + the US 4 holes, and we just added Europe's 4 holes, so in total there
> were 11 holes...
Was there any paper left? ;-)
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr..
Le 22/11/2014 16:34, Rob Jasper a écrit :
>
> I used to work for Bell Labs, and they had as standard (!)
> perforation the US 3 + the US 4 holes, and we just added Europe's 4
> holes, so in total there were 11 holes...
hole-y cow!
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
--
To unsubscribe e-mail
Nice list of things to work on :-))
Wile in the metric system, you might add paper sizes (A4, A3, etc.) and the
perforation of paper..
I used to work for Bell Labs, and they had as standard (!) perforation the US 3
+ the US 4 holes, and we just added Europe's 4 holes, so in total there were 11
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:31:39 -0500
Eric wrote:
[snip]
> >
> not yet, I just detest sql and am campaigning to relegate it to
> COBOL status. (something you never admit to knowing or using :)
Good luck with that. Probably has less chance of success than my
Quixotic campaigns to get the U.S. to sw
On 11/17/2014 3:16 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
If you are just looking around for a hefty back-end then Postgresql is
likely to be far heftier than you really need. Similarly
MySql/MariaDb are also strong and well able to cope with fairly vast
databases. Postgresql connects to Base more eas
On 11/16/2014 5:16 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 16 November 2014 21:57, Eric wrote:
I've googled a bit and did not find anything. Has anyone coupled mongodb and
base together yet?
Just curious, how would you combine relational databases with the
document-oriented ones (such as mongodb)?
I
Hi :)
If you are just looking around for a hefty back-end then Postgresql is
likely to be far heftier than you really need. Similarly MySql/MariaDb are
also strong and well able to cope with fairly vast databases. Postgresql
connects to Base more easily.
If you already have an existing MongoDb d
On 16 November 2014 21:57, Eric wrote:
> I've googled a bit and did not find anything. Has anyone coupled mongodb and
> base together yet?
Just curious, how would you combine relational databases with the
document-oriented ones (such as mongodb)?
Do you have use cases?
--
regards, Jaroslaw Stan
I've googled a bit and did not find anything. Has anyone coupled mongodb
and base together yet?
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfou
17 matches
Mail list logo
