+1 (binding)
I checked the source tarball checksum and gpg signature, and using the RC1
build was able to test a simple VM deployment in a zone in an isolated network
with some firewall rules applied, against a KVM based ACS 4.16.0.0 env.
(note: in my testing, in the first run the firewall appl
You can check the host-param-list details to get the CPU sockets information on
the XCP host.
# xe host-param-list uuid= | grep -i cpu
As mentioned below, if host's CPU sockets value is less than xen.vm.vcpu.max
value, then host's CPU socket value is used to set max vCPUs of VM.
Regards,
Harik
Dear All,
I would like to put myself forward as the release manager for 4.17.0.0.
I propose we have a window of at least 6 weeks to allow the community and users
to test and report issues, I will propose the timeline details soon.
I hope to have your support. Please let me know if you have any
Mikako,
yes, I think you hit a bug. I am not sure if your application will be hurt
by it, but of course it might well be.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 2:13 PM 小林 美佳子 wrote:
>
> Hi.
> I am using CloudStack 4.14.
> I used importUnmanagedinstance to register the VM to CloudStack.
> When there are multip
Nicolas,
Just to mention you did a great job last time!
Kind regards,
On 28 Jan 2022, at 16:05, Nicolas Vazquez
mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to put myself forward as the release manager for 4.17.0.0.
I propose we have a window of at least 6 weeks to
+1 (binding)
performed similar tests as Rohit but in a dual zone and with a vpc in one
of the zones. Two different configurations one with one zone and one with
both. destroy went fine ;) in the vpc firewall rules would not create. I am
not sure this is a known issue, but the error message is clea
