ks
>
>
>
>
> [email protected]
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Dag Sonstebo"
>> To: "users"
uot;users"
> Sent: Friday, 23 February, 2018 16:45:04
> Subject: Re: VR routing issues in Advanced Mode
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Next step is to do some tcpdumping on the two VRs. Set some ping’s going
and
> check:
>
> Private NIC: tcpdu
?
Thanks
- Original Message -
> From: "Dag Sonstebo"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Friday, 23 February, 2018 16:45:04
> Subject: Re: VR routing issues in Advanced Mode
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Next step is to do some tcpdumping on the two VRs. Set some pin
From: "Andrei Mikhailovsky"
> To: "users" , "users"
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 February, 2018 22:10:25
> Subject: Re: VR routing issues in Advanced Mode
> Dag,
>
>
>
>
> Yeah, we have egress traffic enab
Bump.
Any ideas anyone? This issue is really annoying.
Thanks
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrei Mikhailovsky"
> To: "users" , "users"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 February, 2018 22:10:25
> Subject: Re: VR routing issues in Advanced Mo
Dag,
Yeah, we have egress traffic enabled. We also use VPCs on some of the networks
and they are also effected by this issue along with None VPC networks.
Any thoughts?
Andrei Mikhailovsky
From: Dag Sonstebo
Sent: Wednesday 21 February, 18:30
Subject: Re: VR routing issues
Hi Andrei,
Understand. To get all the obvious things out the way – have you allowed egress
traffic on the two networks (you mention ACLs which we only use on VPCs and
basic networks)?
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 21/02/2018, 14:51, "Andrei Mikhailovsky" wrote:
Hi Da
Andrija,
the vms are trying to reach each other using the public IP addresses, not the
private addresses.
Cheers
Andrei
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrija Panic"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 February, 2018 12:48:57
> Subject: Re: VR routi
Hi Dag,
Please see my comments below:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> You’re confusing the matter with your masking of public IP ranges. You said
> you
> have “2 x Public IP ranges with /26 netmask” – but since you are masking them
> out with X’s your email doesn’t make sense. If all the X’s are the same then
Hi Andrei,
You’re confusing the matter with your masking of public IP ranges. You said you
have “2 x Public IP ranges with /26 netmask” – but since you are masking them
out with X’s your email doesn’t make sense. If all the X’s are the same then a
.10 and a .20 IP address would be on the same /
Hi Andrei,
you dont have typo in your input, right ?
if I read this correctly, the case that don't work for you is as following:
VR1 ( XXX.XXX.XXX.10/26) --> Guest1 Network / VM 10.1.1.100/24
VR2 ( XXX.XXX.XXX.20/26)-- Guest1 Network / VM 10.1.1.200/24
Is this correct ?
If so, it's normal t
Hello
Could someone help me to identify the routing issues that we have. The problem
is the traffic from different guest networks can not reach each other via the
public IPs.
Here is my ACS setup:
ACS 4.9.3.0 (both management and agents)
KVM Hypervisor based on Ubuntu 16.04
Ceph as primary
12 matches
Mail list logo
