GitHub user jgotteswinter added a comment to the discussion: Is it safe to run
zone-wide NFS Primary Storage on the Management Server node itself?
If you got Ceph as primary storage, thats sufficient. You need at least 1
primary storage, thats the only requirement.
GitHub link:
https
GitHub user tuanhoangth1603 added a comment to the discussion: Is it safe to
run zone-wide NFS Primary Storage on the Management Server node itself?
Thank you.
One final question: is at least one primary NFS storage required for the ACS
cluster (or pod/zone) to operate in a healthy state
GitHub user jgotteswinter added a comment to the discussion: Is it safe to run
zone-wide NFS Primary Storage on the Management Server node itself?
ACS just has the option to use a NFS, its not the scope of ACS to provide HA
for this. There are multiple options for HA NFS. Like DYI
Linux/BSD
GitHub user tuanhoangth1603 added a comment to the discussion: Is it safe to
run zone-wide NFS Primary Storage on the Management Server node itself?
Thanks for you answer @jgotteswinter. If that's the case, while we're trying to
HA everything, isn't the NFS primary storage
GitHub user jgotteswinter added a comment to the discussion: Is it safe to run
zone-wide NFS Primary Storage on the Management Server node itself?
Expect that if the NFS server goes down and one of its shares is somehow in use
(an idle mount might survive) this will cause hanging tasks. If
GitHub user tuanhoangth1603 created a discussion: Is it safe to run zone-wide
NFS Primary Storage on the Management Server node itself?
Hi everyone,
We are running Apache CloudStack 4.22 with Ceph RBD as the main block storage
for VM disks.
For simplicity, we have been hosting the zone-wide
Hi.
When you create a compute offering you can specify storage tags to tell ACS
which primary storage is it allowed to allocate VMs using this offering. If
no storage tag is specified ACS will choose the next available primary
storage during VM deployment based on deployment planner you select
Just want to throw our experience with this topic.
We use PetaSAN. Its a ceph based storage that includes NFS and iSCSI
gateways... Running on three nodes and all administered via a gui. No
issues and using RBD (ceph) as primary storage. PetaSAN is open source as
well.
Alex
On Wed, Nov 19
HI Paketix,
In addition to all that you have mentioned, have you tried DRBD+Linstor(
Open source) Storage solutions, best for HCI setups, also works for non HCI
setups too.
Thanks & Regards
Nischal
On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 11:35 PM Paketix wrote:
> I am new to CloudStack and could ne
Sure - I am totally aware of this fact.
Maybe I could have been move precise ...
My question was not targeting HA features of NFS.
I am just curious on how ACS is handling an additional (second)
primary/secondary NFS storage server.
Will ACS automatically 'spill over' and use the
Op 17-11-2025 om 19:07 schreef Paketix:
Thanks for all your feedbacks!
I will go for NFS in a first version to keep complexity low.
Maybe I will have multiple NFS servers after a while for both primary
and secondary storage ...
Do understand that NFS itself says nothing about redundancy
with Marty : Calendly <https://calendly.com/rudio-
martyg>
*From: *Levin Ng
*Date: *Friday, November 14, 2025 at 4:52 AM
*To: *[email protected] ,
[email protected]
*Subject: *Re: QCOW2 on NFS shared storage
WARNING: This email originated from outside of the orga
artyg>
*From: *Levin Ng
*Date: *Friday, November 14, 2025 at 4:52 AM
*To: *[email protected] ,
[email protected]
*Subject: *Re: QCOW2 on NFS shared storage
WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless y
Thanks for all your feedbacks!
I will go for NFS in a first version to keep complexity low.
Maybe I will have multiple NFS servers after a while for both primary
and secondary storage ...
Do I have to specify the storage to use in each compute offering or will
ACS store stuff to additional
ww.rudio.net <https://www.yourdomain.url>*
> >
> >
> > RudioLogo_small.png
> >
> > Book a meeting with Marty : Calendly <https://calendly.com/rudio-martyg>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From: *Levin
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Which technology to choose for shared primary storage
I am not so sure if Ceph is a solution which can/should be suggested as first
choice in general. NFS has its own problems, but also has advantages. One is
that its easy, reliable and most of the time performance is more than
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; João
Jandre Paraquetti mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: Which technology to choose for shared primary storage
Op 14-11-2025 om 19:40 schreef João Jandre Paraquetti:
> Hello, Paketix
>
> I
+1 on that, if I were to build a cloud from the ground up I'd 100% use CEPH
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: 17 November 2025 14:45
To: [email protected]; João Jandre Paraquetti
Subject: Re: Which technology to choose for shared primary storage
Op
the file system to read only mode which sends everything to heck in a
handbasket. On Windows VMs it does the blue screen of death and reboots to an
OS Not Found prompt.
Hi, we made a work around this problem using NFS 4.1 and a block storage
replication under, with hearbeat so NFS can't see
Op 14-11-2025 om 19:40 schreef João Jandre Paraquetti:
Hello, Paketix
I would say that the easiest to deal with and most compatible protocol
is NFS.
The next paragraphs assume we are talking about using these storage
types with KVM as the hypervisor.
The "problem" with FC
ll.png
Book a meeting with Marty : Calendly <https://calendly.com/rudio-martyg>
*From: *Levin Ng
*Date: *Friday, November 14, 2025 at 4:52 AM
*To: *[email protected] ,
[email protected]
*Subject: *Re: QCOW2 on NFS shared storage
WARNING: Thi
If you're using KVM, I personally wouldn't use anything other than Ceph
RBD for primary storage. Just make sure you use enterprise grade disks,
don't do something like samsung QVO disks which will give you nothing
but headaches.
On 11/15/25 4:39 AM, Jürgen Gotteswinter wrot
ketix" mailto:[email protected]>>:
I am new to CloudStack and could need some help/advise regarding which
technology to use to implement my shared storage (primary storage).
Having some FibreChannel stuff in the lab this could work well.
... but I am concerned that this is not the directi
st regards
Paketix
On 14.11.25 19:40, João Jandre Paraquetti wrote:
Hello, Paketix
I would say that the easiest to deal with and most compatible protocol
is NFS.
The next paragraphs assume we are talking about using these storage
types with KVM as the hypervisor.
The "problem" wit
Hello, Paketix
I would say that the easiest to deal with and most compatible protocol
is NFS.
The next paragraphs assume we are talking about using these storage
types with KVM as the hypervisor.
The "problem" with FC and iSCSI, when using KVM, is that you'll need an
extra
Correct Apache CloudStack documentation links:
1.
Https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.22.0.0/conceptsandterminology/choosing_deployment_architecture.html#hypervisor-support-for-primary-storage<https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.22.0.0/conceptsandterminol
Hi,
My understanding is that primary storage in CloudStack mainly depends mostly on
what the hypervisor supports, and not CloudStack itself.
The table here in the official CloudStack documentation that shows the
supported storage types per hypervisor, including FC for most of them:
https
I am new to CloudStack and could need some help/advise regarding which
technology to use to implement my shared storage (primary storage).
Having some FibreChannel stuff in the lab this could work well.
... but I am concerned that this is not the direction CloudStack is
developing into.
So
l.png]
Book a meeting with Marty : Calendly<https://calendly.com/rudio-martyg>
From: Levin Ng
Date: Friday, November 14, 2025 at 4:52 AM
To: [email protected] ,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: QCOW2 on NFS shared storage
WARNING: This email originated from outside o
apache.org>>
> Datum: Freitag, 14. November 2025 um 09:45
> An: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>"
> mailto:[email protected]>>
> Betreff: Re: QCOW2 on NFS shared storage
>
>
> Hello guys,
>
>
> I will
to:[email protected]>" mailto:[email protected]>>
Datum: Freitag, 14. November 2025 um 09:45
An: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>"
mailto:[email protected]>>
Betreff: Re: QCOW2 on NFS shared storage
Hello
ff: Re: QCOW2 on NFS shared storage
Hello guys,
I will answer in this email to all the different responses I got.
1. Describe HA setup.
* It’s a basic two-node HA cluster using ZFS. It is a TrueNAS F60
all-NVME. The network is using basic MLAG. The Linux hosts also have an MLAG as
no test pings, sometimes maybe 1, and the mounts on the can be written to
at that 8-10 mark.
Marty
From: Eric Green
Date: Friday, November 14, 2025 at 1:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: QCOW2 on NFS shared storage
WARNING: This email originated from outside of the
kef>
From: Marty Godsey
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 3:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: QCOW2 on NFS shared storage
Hello everyone.
So, I am learning, or reading at least, that QCOW2 file format, running a
shared NFS storage that’s HA, does not to like to fa
Hi Marty,
If your NFS storage do not handle client failover event, you will try to use
NFSv3 with TCP, it should work.
Regards,
Levin
On 14 Nov 2025 at 07:25 +0800, Marty Godsey , wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> So, I am learning, or reading at least, that QCOW2 file format, running a
Hi Marty,
could you describe your nfs setup a bit more? How is the HA setup designed?
Cheers,
Juergen
Von: Marty Godsey
Antworten an: "[email protected]"
Datum: Freitag, 14. November 2025 um 00:25
An: "[email protected]"
Betreff: QCOW2 on NFS s
Hello everyone.
So, I am learning, or reading at least, that QCOW2 file format, running a
shared NFS storage that’s HA, does not to like to failover.
I have an HA NAS running NFS 4.1 and everything works fine until I test the
failure scenario of a failover on the storage nodes. When I do this
GitHub user returntrip added a comment to the discussion: VMHA - CEPH - Why is
NFS pri storage needed?
Thanks for the reply!
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11966#discussioncomment-14869245
This is an automatically sent email for users
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: VMHA - CEPH - Why
is NFS pri storage needed?
@returntrip
you are right. the NFS pool must be enabled prior to #11666
you can tag it.
for VM HA on ceph storage, there was a PR but not merged yet, refer to #5862
GitHub link
GitHub user returntrip created a discussion: VMHA - CEPH - Why is NFS pri
storage needed?
We are testing Linstor and CEPH as primary storage backends. They both seems to
work fine and the VMs are being restarted after 5 minutes time failure.
Whilst Linstor does not need a dummy NFS pri
round in my case was to update the nic table and edit the IP of the
secondary storage vm. After destroying the system vm, the problem was
solved. From the black box point of view, it seems like there is no
validation if the public IP is already reserved?
Mevludin
Am Freitag, 17. Oktober 2025
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
The problem was solved with this command
But when I try to upload a template as a URL, I get an error on management
514a63 with error: PKIX path building failed
GitHub user Hossein4185 edited a comment on the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
I changed the management IP in global setting and the error changed. Please
check.
Wed Sep 24 08:10:52 PM UTC 2025 Starting guest services for vmware
Wed Sep
GitHub user Hossein4185 edited a comment on the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
I changed the management IP in global setting and the error changed. Please
check.
Wed Sep 24 08:10:52 PM UTC 2025 Starting guest services for vmware
Wed Sep
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
> I tested this solution but it didn't solve the problem. #11081
#11081 only applies on vmware 8, not ubuntu 24.04
any error log on management server ?
can you dest
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
> 2025-09-23T22:39:32,101 ERROR [utils.nio.NioClient] (main:[]) IOException
> while connecting to 172.24.48.133:8250 java.io.IOException: SSL Handshake
> fai
GitHub user Jayd603 edited a discussion: Cloudstack agents cannot start without
both primary and secondary storage available - backup/failover question
Ok so it seems like the agent will not even start without both storage mounts
available. I figured I could at least start some kvm VMs if
Dear all,
after an energy outage I am witnessing a strange behaviour: After both
vms could not start because of (what I think) the
"system.vm.management.ip.reservation.mode.strictness" flag was set on
true and after setting this to false, the vms were able to start,
However, now both VMs hav
: Mevludin Blazevic
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2025 9:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Console Proxy and Secondary Storage System VM have the same public IP
Dear all,
after an energy outage I am witnessing a strange behaviour: After both
vms could not start because of (what I
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
2025-09-23T23:21:32,605 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:[]) Agent started
2025-09-23T23:21:32,612 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:[]) Implementation
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
> @weizhouapache The problem was solved with this command But when I try to
> upload a template as a url, I get an error on management
>
> 514a63 with erro
GitHub user prashanthr2 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@Hossein4185 you can try to mount your Secondary Storage NFS on any directory
in the SSVM (create a new test directory if you are not sure) and see if it
works. Based on the
Hello Rajiv,
we are using a AFF-400 together with ACS, currently via a simple NFS export. I
am happy to test and provide feedback. Apart from using it a primary storage,
it would be awesome to also have a object store integration of Ontap.
Cheers,
Juergen
Am 21.08.25, 08:28 schrieb "
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
What script can I use to download directly?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11694#discussioncomment-14497092
This is an
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
set use.https.to.upload=false and restart ssvm and management but get an error
on ssvm
2025-09-24T10:04:36,429 INFO [cloud.agent.Agent] (AgentRequest-Handler-4
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
2025-09-23T22:39:32,101 ERROR [utils.nio.NioClient] (main:[]) IOException while
connecting to 172.24.48.133:8250 java.io.IOException: SSL Handshake failed
while
GitHub user Hossein4185 edited a comment on the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
2025-09-23T23:21:32,605 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:[]) Agent started
2025-09-23T23:21:32,612 INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:[]) Implementation
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
I cannot find any clue @Hossein4185
the issue is different as #11081
I suspect it is due to network configuration (on mgmt server or esxi host which
block the SSL handshake
GitHub user Hossein4185 edited a discussion: Secondary Storage Vm (SSVM) SSL
Handshake failed error
### problem
ssvm can connect to management port 8250. This has been tested with Telnet but
it gives an SSL error.
2025-09-21T20:58:53,248 WARN [utils.nio.Link] (main:[]) SSL Handshake has
HI,
I’m getting CORS issue 403 error when using ACS object browser UI with Ceph SSL
rgw backend. Do anyone has a workable solution for this?
Regards,
Levin
Can you destroy one of the system vms ?
Kind regards,
Wei
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 10:09 AM Mevludin Blazevic
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> after an energy outage I am witnessing a strange behaviour: After both
> vms could not start because of (what I think) the
> "system.vm.management.ip.reservation
oktober 2025 9:36
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [D] Failed to create volume from template on ceph
storage [cloudstack]
GitHub user svenknockaert edited a discussion: Failed to create volume from
template on ceph storage
We are experiencing an issue when creating a template
GitHub user svenknockaert edited a discussion: Failed to create volume from
template on ceph storage
We are experiencing an issue when creating a template from an instance’s volume.
In the GUI, the process seems to complete successfully — the status shows as
“ready.”
However, when this image
GitHub user Hossein4185 edited a comment on the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
The problem was solved with this command
But when I try to upload a template as a url, I get an error on management
514a63 with error: PKIX path building failed
GitHub user Hossein4185 closed the discussion with a comment: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
Yes, there was a network problem. After solving the network problem and running
the script, the certificate problem was solved.
GitHub link:
https
GitHub user Hossein4185 closed a discussion: Secondary Storage Vm (SSVM) SSL
Handshake failed error
### problem
ssvm can connect to management port 8250. This has been tested with Telnet but
it gives an SSL error.
2025-09-21T20:58:53,248 WARN [utils.nio.Link] (main:[]) SSL Handshake has
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Cloudstack agents
cannot start without both primary and secondary storage available -
backup/failover question
this would be a change to the API. Feel free to enter a feature request.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
I execute this command and restarted the Cloud service on ssvm, but the problem
was not solved.
keytool -list -keystore /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/conf/cloud.jks
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Cloudstack agents
cannot start without both primary and secondary storage available -
backup/failover question
@Jayd603 , you can try a hack like that or add the storage as a new storage and
initialise it / seedd it with the system
GitHub user Jayd603 added a comment to the discussion: Cloudstack agents cannot
start without both primary and secondary storage available - backup/failover
question
The other storage server would already have the system VM. Can I add the
new/mirrored storage device and mark it as disabled
GitHub user Jayd603 edited a comment on the discussion: Cloudstack agents
cannot start without both primary and secondary storage available -
backup/failover question
Right. I'm talking about both. Quickest way to handle needing to change to a
backup storage server (that alread
GitHub user Jayd603 edited a comment on the discussion: Cloudstack agents
cannot start without both primary and secondary storage available -
backup/failover question
Right. I'm talking about both. Quickest way to handle needing to change to a
backup storage server (that alread
GitHub user Jayd603 added a comment to the discussion: Cloudstack agents cannot
start without both primary and secondary storage available - backup/failover
question
Right. I'm talking about both. Quickest way to handle needing to change to a
backup storage server (that alread
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Cloudstack agents
cannot start without both primary and secondary storage available -
backup/failover question
doesn’t sound like this would work, all snapshot- and template-records would
still point to the old location. so you
GitHub user Jayd603 edited a discussion: Cloudstack agents cannot start without
both primary and secondary storage available - backup/failover question
Ok so it seems like the agent will not even start without both storage mounts
available. I figured I could at least start some kvm VMs if
GitHub user Jayd603 created a discussion: Cloudstack agents cannot start
without both primary and secondary storage available - backup/failover question
Ok so it seems like the agent will not even start without both storage mounts
available. I figured I could at least start some VMs if one
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
oh, sorry I thought you uploaded template from local
if you upload template with URL, it could be due to the root CA is not
registered in the default `cacerts`.
you can use
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
@weizhouapache
I changed the management IP in global setting and the error changed. Please
check.
Wed Sep 24 08:10:52 PM UTC 2025 Starting guest services for
GitHub user Hossein4185 edited a comment on the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
The problem was solved with this command
But when I try to upload a template as a URL, I get an error on management
514a63 with error: PKIX path building failed
GitHub user Hossein4185 edited a comment on the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
The problem was solved with this command
But when I try to upload a template as a local upload, I get an error on
management
514a63 with error: PKIX path
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
> @weizhouapache I changed the management IP in global setting and the error
> changed. Please check.
>
the new issue seems same to #11081
GitHub link:
https://g
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@Hossein4185
the command is used to list the certificates in keystore, you need to run the
command in #11081, see below
KS_FILE=/usr/local/cloud/systemvm/conf/cloud.jks
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@DaanHoogland
@prashanthr2
I can mount it manually, but the ssvm itself doesn't do it. It doesn't seem to
be due to a certificate issue?
GitHub link:
https://
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@DaanHoogland
Should I do this with a script? Or mount it in a specific path?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11694#discussioncomment-14487333
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
The current state of the systems is as follows:
GitHub link:
https
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
[daemon.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/22491913/daemon.log)
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11694
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
still no clue
can you upload /var/log/daemon.log inside ssvm ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11694#discussioncomment-14485209
This is
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@Hossein4185
I cannot find any clue in the logs
can you run the following commands in SSVM and share new logs ?
```
sed -i "s/INFO/DEBUG/g" /usr/local/cloud/sys
GitHub user Hossein4185 edited a comment on the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
[Downloads.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/22487404/Downloads.zip)
The management log and SSVM Log were uploaded.
GitHub link:
https
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
[Downloads.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/22487404/Downloads.zip)
The management log and SSVM Log were uploaded.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@Hossein4185
can you register a new SYSTEM template with URL
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.20/systemvmtemplate-4.20.2-x86_64-vmware.ova
?
GitHub link:
https
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
> @weizhouapache I executed this command but the problem was not solved.
have you restarted `cloud` service ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussi
GitHub user Hossein4185 edited a comment on the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
We don't have any logs on the management, the Vmware version is 8.0.3, so
rebuilding the SSVM doesn't solve the problem, and then the third health check
log is sent
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@Hossein4185
can you upload the full cloud.log in ssvm and some error logs on management
server ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11694
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
> Yes, of course.
can you run the following command in SSVM ?
@Hossein4185
```
keytool -list -keystore /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/conf/cloud.jks -storepass
$(g
GitHub user Hossein4185 edited a comment on the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
Yes, of course.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11694#discussioncomment-14475341
This is an automatically sent email for
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
Yes, of course.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11694#discussioncomment-14475341
This is an automatically sent email for users
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
@weizhouapache
I executed this command but the problem was not solved.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11694#discussioncomment-14475283
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage
Vm (SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
> @weizhouapache I have already registered with this template.
can you confirm the new SSVM is created from this new template ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apa
GitHub user Hossein4185 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary Storage Vm
(SSVM) SSL Handshake failed error
Yes, of course.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11694#discussioncomment-14475161
This is an automatically sent email for users
1 - 100 of 1951 matches
Mail list logo
