Hey Pearl,
That was it! It was set in Zone
Thanks for pointing that out, ive been pulling my hair out
Regards
Ian
-Original Message-
From: Pearl Dsilva
Sent: 28 November 2025 12:04
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Virtual Router continues to use System Offering
Hi,
>
> We are trying to get the VR to use the 'System Offering For Software
> Router' offering so it uses the shared storage.
>
> We have completed disabled 'System Offering For Software Router - Local
> Storage' offering
>
> We have also set the ID of Syst
Hi,
We are trying to get the VR to use the 'System Offering For Software Router'
offering so it uses the shared storage.
We have completed disabled 'System Offering For Software Router - Local
Storage' offering
We have also set the ID of System Offering For Software
GitHub user Jayd603 closed a discussion: Existing and new templates can no
longer retrieve passwords from virtual router on 4.22
VPC Router log
```Nov 19 17:46:54 systemvm passwd_server_ip.py: serve_password: password saved
for VM IP 10.207.2.196```
ok great, but then on the VM
```2025-11
GitHub user Jayd603 created a discussion: Existing and new templates can no
longer retrieve passwords from virtual router on 4.22
VPC Router log
```Nov 19 17:46:54 systemvm passwd_server_ip.py: serve_password: password saved
for VM IP 10.207.2.196```
ok great, but then on the VM
```2025-11
GitHub user KuasarCloud closed the discussion with a comment: Recurring error
in the VR Router in ACS 4.20.1
it didn't happen again, I'm closing this discussion
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11240#discussioncomment-14288692
This is an automati
GitHub user KuasarCloud closed a discussion: Recurring error in the VR Router
in ACS 4.20.1
Hey community!
After upgrading to 4.20.1 I'm getting this error when trying to start a VM. A
VPC clean up is needed everytime, any clue?
```
2025-07-17 15:44:15,094
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@miloserdoff
it requires investigation. there are several possible root causes.
you can capture the packets to see where it is stuck
GitHub link:
https://github.com
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@weizhouapache What settings on the host should I check?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236#discussioncomment-14219066
This is an
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@miloserdoff
ok, it approves it is not a ACS issue.
if you have already set switch ports to trunk mode, it might be caused by other
switch or host settings.
GitHub
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@weizhouapache Over time, my ACS has changed a bit. The problem remains. My two
hosts have the same bridges (breno1np0-852):
host1:
https://github.com/user-attachments
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
> @weizhouapache Hi, my problem is still not solved. Are there any other ways?
@miloserdoff
it is a very typical issue of virtualization platforms, which is caused
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@weizhouapache Hi, my problem is still not solved. Are there any other ways?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236#discussioncomment
GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: V4.20.1 VPC's virtual
machines can only communicate when a virtual router is running on the Host Node
That is unlikely. Can you trace the connectivity, check the KVM host bridges,
VLAN interfaces, etc?
GitHub link:
https://githu
GitHub user hale177 added a comment to the discussion: V4.20.1 VPC's virtual
machines can only communicate when a virtual router is running on the Host Node
So, is it a bug? @rajujith
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11475#discussioncomment-141
GitHub user hale177 added a comment to the discussion: V4.20.1 VPC's virtual
machines can only communicate when a virtual router is running on the Host Node
> [@hale177](https://github.com/hale177) can you check whether the VLAN for the
> guest network is trunked on the switchpo
GitHub user hale177 created a discussion: V4.20.1 VPC's virtual machines can
only communicate when a virtual router is running on the Host Node
### problem
with two host nodes (A and B), if the VPC's virtual router runs on Node A, only
the VMs on Node A will have network connectiv
GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: V4.20.1 VPC's virtual
machines can only communicate when a virtual router is running on the Host Node
@hale177 can you check whether the VLAN for the guest network is trunked on
the switchports of both the hosts A & B?
Gi
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@weizhouapache Yes, the switch ports are in the correct mode.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236#discussioncomment-14109020
This is
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@miloserdoff
have you configured switch ports to trunk mode ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236#discussioncomment-14104522
This
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@DaanHoogland @pcfriek1987 @weizhouapache
UPDATE: I tried to do the same thing, but in another cluster:
My architecture looks like this:
https://github.com/user
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: OpenWRT as virtual
router?
at the moment you can register an openwrt image as a vnf appliance, @joolli .
There are no concrete plans to support it as a VR alternative or otherwise.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack
GitHub user joolli added a comment to the discussion: OpenWRT as virtual router?
I know that openwrt can run more software and I think it's even adopting the
Alpine package manager and moving away from "opkg". OpenWRT can even run docker
and podman.
The OpenWRT team seems
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: OpenWRT as virtual
router?
Sounds like a good idea with the caveat that the virtual router provides a host
of functionalities that are not particular to routers (user data and password
server spring to mind, but there are bound to
GitHub user joolli edited a discussion: OpenWRT as virtual router?
Hi,
I'm wondering whether someone has looked into using OpenWRT as virtual router?
It seems like it might be a good candidate. The design has gone through
excruciating steps to make it resource sparse, especially rega
GitHub user joolli created a discussion: OpenWRT as virtual router?
Hi,
I'm wondering whether someone has looked into using OpenWRT as virtual router?
It seems like it might be a good candidate. The design has gone through
excruciating steps to make it resource sparse, especially rega
GitHub user KuasarCloud added a comment to the discussion: Recurring error in
the VR Router in ACS 4.20.1
I found these logs of interest
## Managment Server
2025-08-04 10:00:24,384 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-156:[ctx-fde8a59c, job-51130/job-51134, ctx-9d394f89
GitHub user KuasarCloud added a comment to the discussion: Recurring error in
the VR Router in ACS 4.20.1
@rajujith thanks for replying, not working yet, the curious think about the
situation is that is related only to one VR pair in one VPC that has Windows 10
machines!
GitHub link
GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: Recurring error in the
VR Router in ACS 4.20.1
Register the SystemVM template using URL and select the template type as
SYSTEM:
http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.20/systemvmtemplate-4.20.1-x86_64-kvm.qcow2.bz2
Use a new name
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@DaanHoogland VLAN 740. Host maas and host host1
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236#discussioncomment-13886849
This is an
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@miloserdoff , what is the vlan used for the network we are talking about?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236#discussioncomment-13886186
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@pcfriek1987 @weizhouapache
UPDATE:
Here is the output of the brctl show command from each host:
host maas:
```
bridge name bridge id STP enabled
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@pcfriek1987
host maas:
4: cloudbr0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
group default qlen 1000
link/ether 56:aa:00:e8:3d:f6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 172.17.8.5
GitHub user pcfriek1987 added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
what do your bridges look like?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236#discussioncomment-13864507
This is an automatically sent email
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@miloserdoff I have no idea what those values mean. The hosts need to route
untagged and the configured vlan range to eachother. Untagged does not seem to
be an issue
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@DaanHoogland These are the settings I have on my switch. maas, host1, host2
are on ports 7,8,12.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/733988c7-096f-4c62-ae9d
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
to be honest, no. I do some network trouble shooting once in a while so I can
give some clues but am not an expert. What you need to check is routing tables
for the VR
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@DaanHoogland Can you explain step by step what I need to look at to debug the
network?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
sorry to be skeptic, but you really need to debug the network issue. I am
trying top replay your scenario in a lab env but both VMs can reach each
other.. I’ll try
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@DaanHoogland The switch is configured correctly, everything is fine at its
level.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236#discussioncomment
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@miloserdoff , it seems the interfaces cannot route the vlan to each other.
That is either a config of the interfaces or an upstream router/switch.
GitHub link:
https
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@DaanHoogland Yes, now when the virtual machine is on the same host as the
virtual router, it can ping the virtual router and virtual machine-1
https://github.com/user
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
ok, so clearly the bridge does not allow from the vm-2 on host-2 to the vr or
vm-1 on host-1. That would mean a configuration error on the network interfaces
of you
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@DaanHoogland
Ok.
Virtual machine-1 is located on host host1 (172.17.8.6/24) and has ip
10.1.1.2/24.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/81817c19-d5a2-48a5-9ca9
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@miloserdoff , i see you found what I meant with SSVM. By MS i meant the
Management Server.
I am assuming your network has all the right egress and ingress rules set
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
> @pcfriek1987 On any of the available hosts I can create a VM, it will have
> access to the Internet.
@miloserdoff , can you create two VMs in the same network
GitHub user miloserdoff deleted a comment on the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@DaanHoogland Hi, what does MS, SSVM mean?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236#discussioncomment-13859076
This is an automatically
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@DaanHoogland
SSVM (Secondary Storage VM) can ping host2 (172.17.8.7/24)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7c076d1d-f5fe-484e-951b-324f552ad0c9";
/
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@DaanHoogland
1. Yes, two hosts can ping each other
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a3db34a2-fcc1-41cc-98de-6979e8a212dd";
/>
https://github.
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@DaanHoogland Hi, what does MS, SSVM mean?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236#discussioncomment-13859076
This is an automatically
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
several trouble shooting steps:
Can the hosts ping each other?
Can the VM ping the other host?
Can the MS and the SSVM ping host2?
GitHub link:
https://github.com
GitHub user KuasarCloud added a comment to the discussion: Recurring error in
the VR Router in ACS 4.20.1
Thanks @rajujith,
How can I do that?
- Register a new template with the same name?
- When I clean up the VPC how I tell the management server that takes the new
template?
Regards
GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: Recurring error in the
VR Router in ACS 4.20.1
@KuasarCloud can you try a new systemVM template?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11240#discussioncomment-13847122
This is an automatically sent email
GitHub user rajujith edited a comment on the discussion: Recurring error in the
VR Router in ACS 4.20.1
@KuasarCloud can you log in to the VR and check its status? Are there any
filesystem errors? Is it not booting? unresponsive? Are you using any memory
overcommit?
Register a new system VM
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@pcfriek1987 On any of the available hosts I can create a VM, it will have
access to the Internet.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236
GitHub user pcfriek1987 added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
Have you checked if those work on both hosts? eg. if on the switches vlans are
set correctly.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@pcfriek1987 Yes, I have other networks in my Cloudstack system that use VLANs.
There are multiple VLANs on a single host.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache
GitHub user pcfriek1987 added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
are you using any vlans?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236#discussioncomment-13845797
This is an automatically sent email for
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@DaanHoogland can u help me?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236#discussioncomment-13843789
This is an automatically sent email for
GitHub user KuasarCloud edited a comment on the discussion: Recurring error in
the VR Router in ACS 4.20.1
Hi @rajujith
I'm not seeing any error in the VR, it works for awhile an then start failing
trying to insert an entry in the dnsmasq. In the dnsmasq has this error
`root@r-1169-VM
GitHub user KuasarCloud added a comment to the discussion: Recurring error in
the VR Router in ACS 4.20.1
Hi @rajujith
I'm not seeing anything error in the VR, it works for awhile an then start
failing trying to insert an entry in the dnsmasq. In the dnsmasq has this error
`root@r-11
GitHub user miloserdoff added a comment to the discussion: VM does not see
virtual router after migration to another host
@weizhouapache @shwstppr can u help me?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11236#discussioncomment-13829847
This is an automatically sent
GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: Recurring error in the
VR Router in ACS 4.20.1
@KuasarCloud can you log in to the VR and check its status? Are there any
filesystem errors? Is it not booting? unresponsive? Are you not using any
memory overcommit?
Register a new system
GitHub user KuasarCloud added a comment to the discussion: Recurring error in
the VR Router in ACS 4.20.1
I normally clean up the vpc but it's happening every day and only one vpc in
one account
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11240#discussioncomment-137
GitHub user KuasarCloud edited a discussion: Recurring error in the VR Router
in ACS 4.20.1
Hey community!
After upgrading to 4.20.1 I'm getting this error when trying to start a VM. A
VPC clean up is needed everytime, any clue?
```
2025-07-17 15:44:15,094
GitHub user KuasarCloud added a comment to the discussion: Recurring error in
the VR Router in ACS 4.20.1
These are the logs in the KVM Cloudstack Agent
```
2025-07-17 15:45:00,070 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(AgentRequest-Handler-3:[]) (logid:) Exception [Stream closed
GitHub user DaanHoogland closed the discussion with a comment: Virtual Router
creating only on Local Storage
@happyalexkg , I am closing this thread. Please feel free to re-open if you
have more information to add.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10107
GitHub user happyalexkg closed a discussion: Virtual Router creating only on
Local Storage
I created a Service Offering - System Offering For Software Router - HA with
the following settings:
**Storage tags: nvme
Host tags: cloud**
Then, I copied the UUID of System Offering For Software
GitHub user sbrueseke closed a discussion: VPC router changed from UNKNOWN to
PRIMARY
I see the following alert in ACS:
Redundant virtual router r-579-VM just switch from UNKNOWN to PRIMARY at 21 Jan
2025 04:22:18
I want to investigate this, because as far as I know this should not be done
GitHub user DaanHoogland closed the discussion with a comment: VPC router
changed from UNKNOWN to PRIMARY
closing this for lack of activity. please re-open or open a new one if it
becomes relevant again.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10226#discussioncomment
Hi Stanley,
You can use "tcpdump -i icmp" from the instance, or the VR or the
host where the instance is running and the host where the VR is running, or the
network router/switches in your infrastructure to debug and identify the root
cause.
Misconfigured VLANs or bridge/network
Hello All,
I am experiencing an issue with a virtual router, i am getting packet loss
when I am trying to ping google.com or 8.8.8.8. I am also
experiencing issues with other IPs when I am trying to ping it from the
virtual router.
I am using cloudstack 4.18 with ubuntu 20.04 KVM.
Thanks a lot
GitHub user hulucc closed a discussion: Support for non-vpc isolated network
with redundant router
I cannot find a way to create or update non-vpc isolated network with redundant
router.
However, when I tried to update database with `update networks set redundant =
1 where name
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: VPC router changed
from UNKNOWN to PRIMARY
@sbrueseke , do you have a resolution to this query, yet?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10226#discussioncomment-12995182
This is an automatically sent
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Virtual Router
creating only on Local Storage
@happyalexkg , i have been blatently forgetting about your query. Is it still
relevant?
If so is the offering being used the default systemvm one?
GitHub link:
https://github.com
stomizing system vm template
and assign it in cloud stack so that whenever virtual router is created, it
uses this custom system vm template
Regards
Ajit Singh
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 5:12 PM Jürgen Gotteswinter
mailto:[email protected]>lid> wrote:
> The template is
Hi Jürgen Gotteswinter
Thanks for the quick response, is there a link available where I can get
the steps for customizing system vm template
and assign it in cloud stack so that whenever virtual router is created, it
uses this custom system vm template
Regards
Ajit Singh
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at
Hi All
I need to monitor virtual routers in cloud stack using snmp and zabbix and
I have installed required snmp modules and monitoring through zabbix is
working fine.
But if I do a VPC cleanup then a new virtual router is created and all snmp
related steps need to be done again.
Is there a way
loud stack using snmp and zabbix and
I have installed required snmp modules and monitoring through zabbix is
working fine.
But if I do a VPC cleanup then a new virtual router is created and all snmp
related steps need to be done again.
Is there a way to have a custom system vm template with requi
GitHub user pankajfromcomhard closed a discussion: Frequent Router Health Check
Failures in CloudStack
I'm experiencing continuous router health check failures in Apache CloudStack.
Alerts are triggered frequently, impacting VM networking.
Running CloudStack version : CloudStack 4.19.1.
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Frequent Router
Health Check Failures in CloudStack
the VR health check should not impact vm networking.
Do you use redundant VRs ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10691#discussioncomment-12789058
GitHub user Pearl1594 added a comment to the discussion: Frequent Router Health
Check Failures in CloudStack
Could you please check in those individual routers what specific tests are
failing - as it is a known issue that health check fails when there are no VMs
in a VPC: https://github.com
estart.
true: cleanup: If cleanup old network elements: false: makeredundant: Turn the
network into a network with redundant routers.
cloudstack.apache.org
From: Hean Seng
Sent: 14 March 2025 17:59
To: [email protected]
Subject: Virtual Router Not c
gt; Von: Hean Seng
> Gesendet: Freitag, 14. März 2025 17:59
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Virtual Router Not created automatically
>
> Hi
>
> I have my VR that deleted during restart network, however it not
> automatically created back.
>
> Now all the V
Hi Hean,
check if your system vm template is ready. Please provide more information from
management-server.log.
regards,
Swen
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Hean Seng
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. März 2025 17:59
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Virtual Router Not created
Hean has updated on github issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/10574#issuecomment-2726187019
-Wei
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:59 PM Hean Seng wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have my VR that deleted during restart network, however it not
> automatically created back.
>
> Now all the VM that under
Hi
I have my VR that deleted during restart network, however it not
automatically created back.
Now all the VM that under this GuestNetwork are unable to start, it shows
Insufficient Capacity due to no VR . Even though I want to delete this
network from the VM and change another one also cannot
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Support for non-vpc
isolated network with redundant router
Yes @hulucc , you should update the network offering to one which is redundant .
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10405#discussioncomment
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Support for
non-vpc isolated network with redundant router
if you use cmk/cloudmonkey, another option is
```
cmk restart network makeredundant=true id=xxx
```
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10405
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Virtual Router to
output logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki
or other system
if you have a configuration engine running (configd/chef/puppet/ansible/salt),
I'd use that to install whateve
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Virtual Router to output
logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki or
other system
Hi @DaanHoogland @weizhouapache , ive taken a look at #9179 but it still looks
like some way to go.
Is it possible to run a
GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: VPC router changed
from UNKNOWN to PRIMARY
Thx for the reply! :-)
I do not find any entries with "to UNKNOWN at" in the management-server log. I
have no idea why the router was UNKNOWN in the first place. The only thing
whic
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: VPC router changed
from UNKNOWN to PRIMARY
you might search "to UNKNOWN at" to see why it is set to unknown state.
if VR is stopped or host agent is not Up, VR is set to UNKNOWN state
GitHub link:
https://github.
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Virtual Router to
output logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki
or other system
fyi, may refer to #9179
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10165#discussioncomment
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Virtual Router to output
logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki or
other system
I see @DaanHoogland , then can you help convert this ticket to a discussion?
We can continue discussions there.
GitHub link
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Virtual Router to
output logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki
or other system
@btzq , this is not the first time this comes up. There have been
implementation attempt on this as well. Maybe it is
GitHub user happyalexkg deleted a comment on the discussion: Virtual Router
creating only on Local Storage
Hi,
host tags:
