Re: NetworkUsage

[email protected]>" mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: NetworkUsage Hi guys, just bumping up this issue. 2014-03-18 15:01 GMT-03:00 Alena Prokharchyk mailto:[email protected]>>: Ok, backend reports it correctly. So here is the sequence for

Re: NetworkUsage

chyk > Cc: "[email protected]" , Kishan > Kavala > Subject: Re: NetworkUsage > > Take a look at: http://www.fpaste.org/86434/51637081/ > > > 2014-03-18 14:15 GMT-03:00 Alena Prokharchyk >: > >> Diego, >> >> Check for these

Re: NetworkUsage

:[email protected]>>, Kishan Kavala mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: NetworkUsage Take a look at: http://www.fpaste.org/86434/51637081/ 2014-03-18 14:15 GMT-03:00 Alena Prokharchyk mailto:[email protected]>>:

Re: NetworkUsage

ego Spinola Castro > Date: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 at 10:12 AM > > To: Alena Prokharchyk > Cc: "[email protected]" , Kishan > Kavala > Subject: Re: NetworkUsage > > Hi Alena, there's no records after 2013-11-08 (when i did the upgrade >

Re: NetworkUsage

"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" mailto:[email protected]>>, Kishan Kavala mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: NetworkUsage Hi Alena, there's no records after 2013-11-08 (when i did the upgrade to CS 4.2). If there

Re: NetworkUsage

in the DB, can you check if CS reported > any usage during this day? > > Thanks, > Alena. > > From: Diego Spinola Castro > Date: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 at 8:46 AM > To: Alena Prokharchyk > Cc: "[email protected]" , Kishan > Kavala > Subject: Re

Re: NetworkUsage

.org>" mailto:[email protected]>>, Kishan Kavala mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: NetworkUsage HI Alena, thanks for the answer. Let me explain better my case. Regarding those accounts , i have a lot of them without any instance running, there's also some vrouters of

Re: NetworkUsage

reTask.run:267-ThreadPoolExecuto > >r.runWorker:1146-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:615-Thread.run:701 : > >update, update, update, > >-VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl$NetworkUsageTask.run:900-Executors$Run > >nableAdapter.call:471-FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset:351-FutureTask.ru

Re: NetworkUsage

>Unfortunately, there is no way to workaround it on your side as its a >code issue. > >-Alena. > >From: Diego Spinola Castro >mailto:[email protected]>> >Date: Monday, March 17, 2014 at 11:25 AM >To: Alena Prokharchyk >mailto:alena.prokharc...

Re: NetworkUsage

ack.apache.org>> Subject: Re: NetworkUsage Hi, sorry. i went lost with this huge log. 2014-03-17 15:10 GMT-03:00 Alena Prokharchyk mailto:[email protected]>>: Diego, the log you’ve provided, doesn’t contain “Rolling back the transaction” statement. You should wait fo

Re: NetworkUsage

11:00 AM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: NetworkUsage Hi, Alena. thanks for the tips, i got some logs: http://www.fpast

Re: NetworkUsage

Hi, Alena. thanks for the tips, i got some logs: http://www.fpaste.org/86141/13950791/ 2014-03-17 14:27 GMT-03:00 Alena Prokharchyk : > Diego, > > Unfortunately CS lock lack the needed info for debugging the problem. I > see only transaction roll back statement: > > 2014-03-17 06:01:22,363 DEBUG

Re: NetworkUsage

Diego, Unfortunately CS lock lack the needed info for debugging the problem. I see only transaction roll back statement: 2014-03-17 06:01:22,363 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (RouterMonitor-1:null) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 2 Name = -VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl$NetworkUsage

NetworkUsage

Hi guys, i've been running into a issue when getting network traffic from usage server. All records are Zero, i have a CS 4.2.0 install. Here the usage.logs http://www.fpaste.org/86116/13950748/ And management-server.log http://www.fpaste.org/86118/07486613/ Does anyone know what is wrong ?