GitHub user TadiosAbebe added a comment to the discussion: Shared network issue
on advanced zone with security group
I was able to do some more test today spinning up a test Cloudstack environment
and here are my findings,
- For a KVM host that doesn't have docker installed, the de
GitHub user TadiosAbebe added a comment to the discussion: Shared network issue
on advanced zone with security group
The thing is, I couldn't not say the docker chain is dropping the traffic
because that chain is on all the other hosts and it is not affecting them
One thing i know for
GitHub user TadiosAbebe added a comment to the discussion: Shared network issue
on advanced zone with security group
removed the docker* chains with the following command, but VR->internet and
VM->VR connectivity issue still persists
```
iptables -D FORWARD -j DOCKER-USER
iptables -D F
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Shared network
issue on advanced zone with security group
> actually, here is what i did, there were a bunch of isolated networks and vm,
> i have 5 nodes in my zone all on the same cluster. so one day when i am
> te
GitHub user TadiosAbebe added a comment to the discussion: Shared network issue
on advanced zone with security group
actually, here is what i did, there were a bunch of isolated networks and vm, i
have 5 nodes in my zone all on the same cluster. so one day when i am testing
the shared
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Shared network
issue on advanced zone with security group
> I actually enabled security group after the creating of the zone, so when
> initially launching the zone, it was just advanced zone, the i was able to
> create
GitHub user TadiosAbebe added a comment to the discussion: Shared network issue
on advanced zone with security group
I actually enabled security group after the creating of the zone, so when
initially launching the zone, it was just advanced zone, the i was able to
create isolated network
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Shared network
issue on advanced zone with security group
just curious, how to create isolated network in advanced zone with security
groups ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11955#discussioncomment
GitHub user TadiosAbebe created a discussion: Shared network issue on advanced
zone with security group
Hello community,
This past few days i was testing shared network in advanced zone with security
group and i think i am just missing a lot of understanding about it. and here
is my issue
GitHub user bradh352 edited a comment on the discussion: private gateway attach
to physical network issue
Inspecting the database gave me a hint, the traffic type in the database said
"Guest" and I didn't have any guest network defined for my 'mgmt' physical
netw
GitHub user bradh352 created a discussion: private gateway attach to physical
network issue
I've got these physical networks:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/362e968d-7332-4a09-80d9-502f9cad0edd";
/>
And I want to add a private gateway to access the mgmt network to
GitHub user bradh352 closed a discussion: private gateway attach to physical
network issue
I've got these physical networks:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/362e968d-7332-4a09-80d9-502f9cad0edd";
/>
And I want to add a private gateway to access the mgmt network to
GitHub user bradh352 added a comment to the discussion: private gateway attach
to physical network issue
Inspecting the database gave me a hint, the traffic type in the database said
"Guest" and I didn't have any guest network defined for my 'mgmt' physical
network.
GitHub user weizhouapache closed the discussion with a comment: private gateway
attach to physical network issue
@bradh352
I have created a github issue for tracking : #11798
closing this
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11795#discussioncomment-14612362
GitHub user bradh352 added a comment to the discussion: private gateway attach
to physical network issue
I verified with `cmk` as well to make sure its not a UI bug. It definitely
attaches it to a physical network other than what I specified even though the
UUIDs all match.
Its like its
GitHub user hqming86 closed a discussion: multiple physical network with guest
network issue
I try to deploy cloudstack guest network for multiple physical network, but It
looks like doesn't work, can any one help?
**I designed as below:**
There are three physical network:
1、phy
GitHub user hqming86 added a comment to the discussion: multiple physical
network with guest network issue
I figure out what is going on, I forgot download system template , now the
issue solved.
Thanks everyone.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11089
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: multiple physical
network with guest network issue
@hqming86
yes, looks like a secondary storage issue
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11089#discussioncomment-13718997
This is an automatically
GitHub user hqming86 added a comment to the discussion: multiple physical
network with guest network issue
do all kvm hosts have the same setting ?
Thare are only one host in the zone
is bond4 configured with 1 or 2 physical interfaces ? or it is just a virtual
nic ?
it's 2 phy
GitHub user hqming86 edited a discussion: multiple physical network with guest
network issue
I try to deploy cloudstack guest network for multiple physical network, but It
looks like doesn't work, can any one help?
**I designed as below:**
There are three physical network:
1、phy
GitHub user hqming86 edited a discussion: multiple physical network with guest
network issue
I try to deploy cloudstack guest network for multiple physical network, but It
looks like doesn't work, can any one help?
I designed as below:
There are three physical network:
1、physical net
GitHub user hqming86 edited a discussion: multiple physical network with guest
network issue
I try to deploy cloudstack guest network for multiple physical network, but It
looks like doesn't work, can any one help?
I designed as below:
There are three physical network:
1、physical net
GitHub user hqming86 edited a discussion: multiple pyhsical network with guest
network issue
I try to deploy cloudstack guest network for multiple pyhsical netowrk, but It
looks like doesn't work, can any one help?
I designed as below:
There are three physical network:
1、physical net
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: multiple pyhsical
netowrk with guest network issue
@hqming86 , what is your ratio on creating a “Guest” network with tag “NFS",
but have your “Storage” network on the same as the first “Guest” network?
I have no idea why the
GitHub user hqming86 edited a discussion: multiple physical network with guest
network issue
I try to deploy cloudstack guest network for multiple pyhsical netowrk, but It
looks like doesn't work, can any one help?
I designed as below:
There are three physical network:
1、physical net
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: multiple pyhsical
network with guest network issue
@hqming86
- do all kvm hosts have the same setting ?
- is bond4 configured with 1 or 2 physical interfaces ? or it is just a virtual
nic ?
- can you share the agent.log ?
GitHub
GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: multiple
pyhsical netowrk with guest network issue
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11089#discussioncomment-13574396
GitHub user bullblock closed a discussion: setup a cloudsatck on aws vpc (LEVEL
2 network issue and Primary Storage issue)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/186d86ce-84fe-4c5d-8739-4c6c35c944d3";>
Recently, I built a CloudStack env on AWS VPC. We all know that AWS VPC could
GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: setup a cloudsatck on
aws vpc (LEVEL 2 network issue and Primary Storage issue)
@bullblock sharing these articles:
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/building-a-cloud-in-the-cloud-running-apache-cloudstack-on-amazon-ec2-part-1/
https
GitHub user alexandremattioli added a comment to the discussion: setup a
cloudsatck on aws vpc (LEVEL 2 network issue and Primary Storage issue)
NFS for primary storage should work just like the secondary storage. How are
you presenting it to CloudStack?
GitHub link:
https://github.com
GitHub user bullblock edited a discussion: setup a cloudsatck on aws vpc (LEVEL
2 network issue and Primary Storage issue)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/186d86ce-84fe-4c5d-8739-4c6c35c944d3";>
Recently, I built a CloudStack env on AWS VPC. We all know that AWS VPC could
GitHub user bullblock edited a discussion: setup a cloudsatck on aws vpc (LEVEL
2 network issue and Primary Storage issue)
Recently, I built a CloudStack env on AWS VPC. We all know that AWS VPC could
be more friendly to Level 2 networks since it filters all Level 2 traffic. This
means that
esday, July 2, 2024 21:03
To: [email protected]
Subject: Network issue
Hi,
I have 2 KVM nodes with 2 network interfaces.
VLAN 7 – cloudbr0 (Mgmt)
VLAN 1001 – cloudbr1 (public, guest)
I have created 2 instances and 1 network (192.168.0.1 - guest). Router
– 10.0.0.3 (Public).
If all VMs o
Hi,
I have 2 KVM nodes with 2 network interfaces.
VLAN 7 – cloudbr0 (Mgmt)
VLAN 1001 – cloudbr1 (public, guest)
I have created 2 instances and 1 network (192.168.0.1 - guest). Router
– 10.0.0.3 (Public).
If all VMs on the first node – all work but if I migrate the VM to the
second node – the n
Hi,
I have 2 KVM nodes with 2 network interfaces.
VLAN 7 – cloudbr0 (Mgmt)
VLAN 1001 – cloudbr1 (public, guest)
I have created 2 instances and 1 network (192.168.0.1 - guest). Router
– 10.0.0.3 (Public).
If all VMs on the first node – all work but if I migrate the VM to the
second node – the networ
If you use shared network, it is definitely a network issue, as Cloudstack
only provides dns/dhcp/userdata service for shared networks.
-Wei
On Friday, March 1, 2024, Bharat Bhushan Saini
wrote:
> Hi Jayanth,
>
>
>
> As per my analysis, I think some latches has been with clou
A
Date: Friday, 1 March 2024 at 8:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Network Issue with Cluster
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.
I think this has something to do with your
I think this has something to do with your network and not CloudStack. Let us
know what you find after the analysis.
Thanks,
Jayanth
From: Bharat Bhushan Saini
Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 6:02:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Network Issue
:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Network Issue with Cluster
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.
Hello Bharat,
Are you saying that you're observing the latency among the V
Hello Bharat,
Are you saying that you're observing the latency among the VMs in the same
network?
Thanks,
Jayanth
From: Bharat Bhushan Saini
Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 5:20:22 pm
To: [email protected]
Subject: Network Issue with Cluster
H
Hi All,
Yesterday cloudstack deployment is running fine. Today I encountered an issue
in the cloudstack 4.18.1.
The connectivity of the VM’s in the cloudstack dashboard having latches eg
control and worker node. I also restarted the network but the issue is persist.
Sharing the ping status of
Hi,
Hypervisor does tag but seems your switch can't see it. Please check the switch
configuration.
Thanks
Jayanth
From: Francisco Arencibia Quesada
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 8:53:17 pm
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: public network
hi guys,
same issue this is our switch, Drop :(
NW-LEAF-A# show ip arp vrf VrfCustomer | grep Vlan201
149.88.10.3 00:00:00:00:00:00 Vlan201
- Dynamic Drop
149.88.10.4 00:00:00:00:00:00 Vlan201
- Dynamic
Hi,
It looks like your public network uses vlan 201. Can you confirm if it has
been configured on your upstream router?
-Wei
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 12:47, Francisco Arencibia Quesada <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Good morning, everyone,
>
> I am experiencing issues with the public ne
Hello Francisco,
Please check if you're able to reach the gateway of the guest network from
a VM in the same guest network. Please also ask your networks team to check
if your uplink devices are able to learn the MAC address of the VR's public
IP interface. If they are unable to learn, please check
Good morning, everyone,
I am experiencing issues with the public network:
I deployed a VM, but I am unable to reach the public IP attached to the VR.
Additionally, the VR cannot ping the internet. My networking team suggests
that there might be a problem in the KVM network configuration.
Here is
ich will setup
the key (since the agent is connected already, it won't use ssh for cert/key
setup).
Regards.
From: Pieter Koorts
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 21:48
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: CloudStack 4.15 Focal network issue on MA
Finally restart sshd and add host via CloudStack UI/API.
[1] https://rohityadav.cloud/blog/cloudstack-kvm/
Regards.
From: Pieter Koorts
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 18:06
To: [email protected]
Subject: CloudStack 4.15 Focal network issue on
CloudStack UI/API.
[1] https://rohityadav.cloud/blog/cloudstack-kvm/
Regards.
From: Pieter Koorts
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 18:06
To: [email protected]
Subject: CloudStack 4.15 Focal network issue on MAAS
Hi,
Just wanted to check if there i
Hi,
Just wanted to check if there is some way to get cloudstack to read the network
information without a /etc/network/interfaces file? The reason being that
Ubuntu MAAS when deploying a host by default uses netplan to configure all
interfaces. All bridges and routes are valid and there is f
Hello All,
Anyone can advise on this please ?
Best Regards,
Ghaith Bannoura
-Original Message-
From: Ghaith Bannoura [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 5:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Network issue
Hi Imran,
Please find my comments as below
ginal Message-
From: Imran Ahmed [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 4:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Network issue
Hi Ghaith,
In that case, while creating the zone first time, have correctly added all the
traffic types to the first NIC.
Also hav
you using for your management network, public network ?
Regards,
Imran
-Original Message-
From: Ghaith Bannoura [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 5:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Network issue
Hi Imran,
Guest , public and management on the same
http://www.etq.com
-Original Message-
From: Imran Ahmed [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 3:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Network issue
Hi Ghaith,
You have not provided the details about your traffic labels.
Regards,
Imran
-Original
Hi Ghaith,
You have not provided the details about your traffic labels.
Regards,
Imran
-Original Message-
From: Ghaith Bannoura [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 5:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Network issue
Hello All,
I have ACS 4.9.2 with xen
Hello All,
I have ACS 4.9.2 with xen server 6.5 with advanced zone , I have guest network
for using the instances locally , with subnet 192.168.124.0/22 , I have a
problem that when create a new instance the instance not accessible when the ip
range is 192.168.124.XXX , if I changed the ip to b
t;>
>>
>> From: Andrija Panic
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 4:09 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: help/advise needed: Private gateway vs. new physcial network
>> is
_
> From: Andrija Panic
> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 4:09 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: help/advise needed: Private gateway vs. new physcial network
> issue
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> not at all. We use tags onl
.
From: Andrija Panic
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 4:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: help/advise needed: Private gateway vs. new physcial network issue
Hi Simon,
not at all. We use tags only for storage and compute(service)/disk
offerings...
But,
I
your vpc network offerings that
> correspond to your zone network tags?
>
>
> From: Andrija Panic
> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 3:46 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: help/advise needed: Private gateway
needed: Private gateway vs. new physcial network issue
Hi all,
I'm trying to to test Private Gateway on our production (actually on DEV
first :) ) setup, of ACS 4.5,
but I'm hitting some strange issues during actual creation of PV GTW.
My setup is the following:
ACS 4.5, advanced zone K
Hi all,
I'm trying to to test Private Gateway on our production (actually on DEV
first :) ) setup, of ACS 4.5,
but I'm hitting some strange issues during actual creation of PV GTW.
My setup is the following:
ACS 4.5, advanced zone KVM (ubuntu 14)
mgmt network: KVM label/name: cloudbr0
sec. stor.
After posting this I thought about it more and answered my own question. I see
this type of setup being a management nightmare, e.g. rouge dhcp servers or
anything else a user would attempt without the proper vlan/pvlan segmentation
on the guest network in place it would be a hot mess. Thanks
Hello everyone, I am new to Cloudstack and have it deployed in our lab
currently so go easy :) I have everything working as expected with the
advanced network zone, vmware support, and multiple vlan isolation working
properly. I have a few questions I would like to ask here about networking
64 matches
Mail list logo
