Re: Cloudstack and glusterfs native implementation

2013-07-22 Thread Olivier Mauras
Hi David, Thanks for your reply. Sad that it couldn't be added to 4.2. Seeing that 4.1 got out in June and 4.2 is planned to end of this month, is it safe to imagine having this feature by September? Thanks, Olivier On 2013-07-22 16:01, David Nalley wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > The folks fro

Re: Cloudstack and glusterfs native implementation

2013-07-22 Thread David Nalley
The feature could be added to the repository at essentially anytime. I am not sure when the folks working on it will have it done. I've cced Ilya - he's backported freshly developed features for CloudStack to stable releases for his distribution, called CloudSand, and perhaps he'd consider doing so

Re: Cloudstack and glusterfs native implementation

2013-07-22 Thread David Nalley
Hi Olivier, The folks from Appcore were also recently talking about this, and after seeing the performance difference in libgfapi and FUSE I am certainly interested in getting this integrated. 4.2 is already in feature freeze, and we are chronologically close to releasing it, so it won't be in the

Cloudstack and glusterfs native implementation

2013-07-22 Thread Olivier Mauras
Hello, Now that glusterfs 3.4 is officially out and that qemu and libvirt support it, would that be possible to use glusterfs native implementation as main storage?? Native implementation performances are really better than using fuse or NFS mountpoint. It would be nice to be able to this featu