Re: Has anyone hit a performance/throughput limitation with Cloudstack Virtual Router yet?

2024-03-29 Thread Bryan Tiang
Hi Community, Just to clarify, am asking this specifically for the Virtual Router. Regards, Bryan On 29 Mar 2024 at 10:04 PM +0800, Bryan Tiang , wrote: > Hi Community, > > My company builds Stock Trading Systems and we are using Cloudstack for > hosting the services we need for distributing Liv

Has anyone hit a performance/throughput limitation with Cloudstack Virtual Router yet?

2024-03-29 Thread Bryan Tiang
Hi Community, My company builds Stock Trading Systems and we are using Cloudstack for hosting the services we need for distributing Live Market Data Prices to around 100,000 Concurrent Users. Id like to know, has anyone hit any performance/throughput limit with Cloudstack before? And if so, wh

RE: CloudStack - Virtual Router

2016-01-20 Thread Yesid Mora
: 3124509565 Cr. 7 #74-56 | Oficina 202 | Bogotá, Colombia http://www.o4it.com | mailto:[email protected] -Original Message- From: Simon Weller [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 8:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CloudStack - Virtual Router Have you got a box

Re: CloudStack - Virtual Router

2016-01-20 Thread Simon Weller
://www.o4it.com | mailto:[email protected] -Original Message- From: Simon Weller [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 12:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CloudStack - Virtual Router You could set a periodic keep-alive on the cisco side. Try something lik

RE: CloudStack - Virtual Router

2016-01-19 Thread Yesid Mora
com | mailto:[email protected] -Original Message- From: Simon Weller [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 12:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CloudStack - Virtual Router You could set a periodic keep-alive on the cisco side. Try something like this:

Re: CloudStack - Virtual Router

2016-01-19 Thread Simon Weller
You could set a periodic keep-alive on the cisco side. Try something like this: crypro isakmp keepalive 10 5 periodic - Si From: Yesid Mora Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 10:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: CloudStack - Virtual Router Hello

CloudStack - Virtual Router

2016-01-19 Thread Yesid Mora
Hello guys, I’m having a problem with a IPSEC vpn between a Cisco and my Virtual router, cause in order to start the traffic on the tunnel the Cisco side needs to send traffic first to my site and then I can ping the Cisco site, Something like this. Virtual router site IP 10.10.20.0/24 Cisco

RE: Cloudstack Virtual Router

2013-07-31 Thread Musayev, Ilya
Router VM in my case: Eth1 - guest net Eth2 - mgmt net > -Original Message- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:34 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Cloudstack Virtual Router > > Anton, > > P

RE: Cloudstack Virtual Router

2013-07-31 Thread Musayev, Ilya
, July 30, 2013 6:12 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Cloudstack Virtual Router > > Hello everyone! > I have problem with autoconfig network by CS 4.1 for VR. > When CS starting the router it gives 3 nic. > One of this nic is public traffic. But it gives ip from p

Cloudstack Virtual Router

2013-07-30 Thread Anton Rubets
Hello everyone! I have problem with autoconfig network by CS 4.1 for VR. When CS starting the router it gives 3 nic. One of this nic is public traffic. But it gives ip from public, in the configuration public, but in XCP1.6 create with management vlan. Someone have problem like this? Thx