You are correct.
Snapshots remain visible in the GUI and can be removed.
Thanks, that explains it.
Best Regards,
Jordan
-Original Message-
From: Slavka Peleva
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 3:42 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Size of the snapshots volume
[X] This
Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with XCP-NG. I rechecked your steps, and
there isn't a call to delete a volume snapshot. I think that destroying a
VM works almost the same for all hypervisors, and the volume snapshots
won't be deleted automatically. Can you check if they are visible in the UI?
On
Hey Slavka,
Deployment is 4.15.2 + XCP-NG 8.2 utilizing fiber channel SAN as
primary storage.
Regards,
Jordan
-Original Message-
From: Slavka Peleva
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 2:54 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Size of the snapshots volume
[X] This me
Hi Yordan,
can you share what are you using for primary storage? In some cases, the
deletion of snapshots on secondary isn't implemented. According to the
code, the cleanup of the snapshots is only for the DB, not for cleaning the
secondary storage.
Best regards,
Slavka
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 2
Thank you all very much!
I figured out this question :)
I asked another question - Can I dedicate Physical Network (some new PN with
for example GRE isolation method) to some 1 Pod or Cluster?
-Original Message-
From: Cristian Ciobanu [mailto:cristian.c@istream.today]
Sent: Thursday,
Hello,
You can check the the snapshot status in - snapshots table in DB. You can also
verify the status in table called - snapshot_store_ref. Yes cloudStack runs a
cleanup job, timings depends what you have defined in global setting -
storage.cleanup.delay Determines how long (in seconds)
If you want to use 2 bond networks as you described, you can have 2 or
more, you can use the same NIC/bond for multiple "physical networks"
Example:
2XNICs - Bond1
2XNICs - Bond2
You can create 2 or more physical networks, if the traffic label you are
using in these networks is "bond1 or bond2"
And bear in mind that this storage network will be used for your secondary
storage, it will have traffic when templates are copied to primary storage and
snapshots are copied to secondary storage. If you are already segregating your
primary storage traffic it is a good idea to then place this t
Hi Evgeniy,
Physical networks consist of a mapping between a certain ACS type of networks
(guest, management, storage, public) and the physical NICS.
You can very well have just one physical network for all types of networks, and
many do that, but ideally you would segregate, let me give you a f
Here is another thing I noticed.
- have a VM with a volume snapshots
- Expunge the VM so the disk is removed also
- check the Secondary Storage - backup still remains.
Does anyone knows if Cloudstack does a cleanup later or the orphaned backups
will remain?
Regards,
Jordan
-Original Messag
Hi Peter,
I need to get round to polishing a dockerfile that would create an image to
be run as a CloudStack simulator in a container (or if there's enough
interest I could share it's current state for others to finish).
But. If you want to work on real world integrations, I'd guess that you
THX A LOT!!!
Now I think I understand :)
MB you can answer another question? :) Can I dedicate Physical Network (some
new PN with for example GRE isolation method) to some 1 Pod or Cluster?
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021
Hi all,
from what I can find, there are three more or less established/already well
elaborated approaches to simulate a CloudStack instance locallly.
Depending on the target group and their goals, they can have different levels
of fidelity and usability.
1. Obviously CloudStack developers conf
It is better that the physical networks in cloudstack zone are the same as
the bonds/nics on hypervisors.
but if they are not the same, it is not a problem - please set correct
traffic labels on Traffic Types (The traffic types in a cloudstack physical
network can use different traffic labels).
-W
Then Physical Network in CS == bonds in hypervisors? And we should place
traffic labels on Physical Network (bond) where are presented?
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 12:48 PM
To: users
Subject: Re: [!!Mass Mail]Re
I would use one for storage and management and one for public and guest.
This is a security consideration. You would also need to take into account
how mucg traffic you generate; if you have a lot of hardly ever changing
VMs you won't have much management traffic and this is probably the best.
If y
If I correctly understand you in my case is better use 2 Physical Networks - 1
with Management traffic (and Management traffic label) and another with Guest
and Public (Guest and Public traffic labels). But I have this 3 traffic types
on 1 bond - It somehow affects?
-Original Message-
Hi Irvin,
To access a vm in an isolated network, you need to use static nat, port
forwarding or load balancer.
Please refer to
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.15.2.0/adminguide/networking/ip_forwarding_and_firewalling.html
-Wei
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 11:09, SVI wrote:
> Thanks Wei! Ano
A reason to keep management with storage is not perse to keep it with
storage but because you want it to be private, while guests and public are
exposed.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:22 AM Дикевич Евгений Александрович <
evgeniy.dikev...@becloud.by> wrote:
> Thx for the answer!
>
> What benefits wi
Thx for the answer!
What benefits will I get if I use more than 1 network?
Somewhere I read than is better to use Management and Storage traffic types on
same Physical Network. Is it true?
I forgot some information - we will use Presetup Storage for clusters. We will
use more than 1 public net
Hello community,
today I need your experience and knowhow about clustered/shared filesystems
based on SAN storage to be used with KVM.
We need to consider about a clustered/shared filesystem based on SAN storage
(no NFS or iSCSI), but do not have any knowhow or experience with this.
Those I woul
yes evgenly,
I think you are describing two physical networks.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:58 AM Дикевич Евгений Александрович <
evgeniy.dikev...@becloud.by> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Can someone explain me concept of Physical Networks?
>
> Now I have Xen hosts with 4 NICs. They are grouped in 2 bonds.
Thanks Wei! Another thing, can I set a default firewall rule? For egress, I’ll
check the networking offering
Thanks,
Irvin
> On Oct 21, 2021, at 4:44 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
> Hi SVI,
>
> It looks like you do use an advanced zone.
>
> If your users create vm on isolated networks, please see my
Hi all!
Can someone explain me concept of Physical Networks?
Now I have Xen hosts with 4 NICs. They are grouped in 2 bonds. On 1 bond I have
Management, Guest and Public VLANs. On other - Storage VLANs.
When I deploy ZONE should I create 2 Physical Networks? Or I can create 3 (1?)
network for
Hi,
As I said, please give more details. Otherwise, it is hard to answer
your questions.
for example, zone type, network type, hypervisor ...
-Wei
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 09:49, SVI wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> Unfortunately, I am not using advanced zone. And yes, the Cloudstack UI
> (4.15.2) is exp
Hi Wei,
Unfortunately, I am not using advanced zone. And yes, the Cloudstack UI
(4.15.2) is exposed to users.
Thanks.
> On Oct 21, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I assume you use isolated networks in advanced zone.
> the firewall rule list is empty by default, egress rule can
Hi Harikrishna!
I test this provider strongly and so far I have not found any errors (eg
work as expected).
But I have a question, do you plan to adapt this provider's capabilities to
the new CS 4.16 and kubernetes plugin?
I am very interested in setting up a K8S cluster using CS (preferably with
27 matches
Mail list logo
