Re: CloudWatch Capability for AWS Component?

2012-11-05 Thread dacc
ith this CloudWatch component? > > At this moment such a component would be very useful for me :) > > Cheers > Bilgin > > On 20 March 2012 23:54, dacc <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I'm considering adding a CloudWatch capability to

Better Way to Achieve Parallel Processing of SQS Messages?

2012-03-19 Thread dacc
I'm trying to consume multiple exchanges from an SQS endpoint with autoack disabled, but SqsConsumer blocks on completion of the first one that arrives. I could have each of my workers poll SQS separately, but this will increase the number of requests by a factor of the number of workers, which do

Re: Better Way to Achieve Parallel Processing of SQS Messages?

2012-03-20 Thread dacc
Hey Claus, Thanks for your reply. SQS doesn't guarantee FIFO, so consumers already have to handle things being out-of-order: http://aws.amazon.com/sqs/faqs/#Does_Amazon_SQS_provide_first_in_first_out_FIFO_access_to_messages Based on GenericFileConsumer, perhaps this is a better patch: https://

CloudWatch Capability for AWS Component?

2012-03-20 Thread dacc
Hello All, I'm considering adding a CloudWatch capability to the AWS component. Does this sound useful and/or is someone already working on it? I'm writing an event-driven application that responds to changing metric values in CloudWatch, and I'd like to use the same Akka/Camel message pipeline

Re: Better Way to Achieve Parallel Processing of SQS Messages?

2012-03-23 Thread dacc
Ok, I made a ticket below: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5113 - D -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Better-Way-to-Achieve-Parallel-Processing-of-SQS-Messages-tp5578135p5590255.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.