Re: using methodName for bean binding doesn't work with Processor beans

2009-10-08 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:51 PM, erh wrote: > > > > Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: >> >> Thanks I can see its the new OSGi blueprint support that causes some >> maven issues. >> Will disable this until blueprint works completely. >> > > Well, the build worked, but some tests failed, and I guess that means th

Re: using methodName for bean binding doesn't work with Processor beans

2009-10-08 Thread erh
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: > > Thanks I can see its the new OSGi blueprint support that causes some > maven issues. > Will disable this until blueprint works completely. > Well, the build worked, but some tests failed, and I guess that means the tarball didn't get over to repository.apache.org. :(

Re: using methodName for bean binding doesn't work with Processor beans

2009-10-07 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:44 PM, erh wrote: > > > Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:32 PM, erh wrote: >>> Do the snapshots get built automatically?  The dates on the files in the >>> 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT directory are a bit odd.  The md5 and sha1 files have a >>> timestamp from October

Re: using methodName for bean binding doesn't work with Processor beans

2009-10-07 Thread erh
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:32 PM, erh wrote: >> Do the snapshots get built automatically?  The dates on the files in the >> 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT directory are a bit odd.  The md5 and sha1 files have a >> timestamp from October 4th, but the tarballs are from September 29th and >

Re: using methodName for bean binding doesn't work with Processor beans

2009-10-07 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:32 PM, erh wrote: > > > > Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I have just backported a fix for CAMEL-1878 to 1.x as well. >> You are welcome to try with a new 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT whether it fixes your >> bean problem. >> >> > > Do the snapshots get built automatically?  The dat

Re: using methodName for bean binding doesn't work with Processor beans

2009-10-05 Thread erh
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: > > Hi > > I have just backported a fix for CAMEL-1878 to 1.x as well. > You are welcome to try with a new 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT whether it fixes your > bean problem. > > Do the snapshots get built automatically? The dates on the files in the 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT directory are a bi

Re: using methodName for bean binding doesn't work with Processor beans

2009-10-04 Thread erh
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: > > Hi > > I have just backported a fix for CAMEL-1878 to 1.x as well. > You are welcome to try with a new 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT whether it fixes your > bean problem. > > Thanks! I'll give it a shot. eric -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/using-methodN

Re: using methodName for bean binding doesn't work with Processor beans

2009-10-03 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi I have just backported a fix for CAMEL-1878 to 1.x as well. You are welcome to try with a new 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT whether it fixes your bean problem. On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:01 PM, erh wrote: > > I'm having trouble getting the methodName to work when routing to a bean > using a route like this:

Re: using methodName for bean binding doesn't work with Processor beans

2009-10-02 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Use To invoke the Processor which then will invoke the process(Exchange) method. On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:01 PM, erh wrote: > > I'm having trouble getting the methodName to work when routing to a bean > using a route like this: > >   >   > > > foo is a bean that implements Processor [

using methodName for bean binding doesn't work with Processor beans

2009-10-02 Thread erh
I'm having trouble getting the methodName to work when routing to a bean using a route like this: foo is a bean that implements Processor [*2], and in some routes I want it to use the process() method, but in this case I need to use a different entry point. According to http://camel.a