Re: VM component, URI for matching

2012-05-09 Thread Thomas Johansen
CAMEL-5261. Thomas 2012/5/9 Claus Ibsen > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Thomas Johansen wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > The problem goes for both seda and vm. BUT I discovered that the problem > > only arises when the vm/seda route is adviced with > > interceptSendToEndpoint(). And still only o

Re: VM component, URI for matching

2012-05-08 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Thomas Johansen wrote: > Hi again, > > The problem goes for both seda and vm. BUT I discovered that the problem > only arises when the vm/seda route is adviced with > interceptSendToEndpoint(). And still only on 2.9.1/2.9.2, not 2.9.0. > > I'm attaching my stripped

Re: VM component, URI for matching

2012-05-08 Thread Thomas Johansen
Hi again, The problem goes for both seda and vm. BUT I discovered that the problem only arises when the vm/seda route is adviced with interceptSendToEndpoint(). And still only on 2.9.1/2.9.2, not 2.9.0. I'm attaching my stripped down test. It is all green on Camel 2.9.0 and 2 out of 4 fail on Cam

Re: VM component, URI for matching

2012-05-08 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Thomas Johansen wrote: > Hi Claus, > > So what's the deal? This is certainly an incompatibility between 2.9.0 and > 2.9.1/2.9.2? On 2.9.1/2.9.2 the producer and consumer don't communicate > when having the option on the consumer and not on the producer. This makes >

Re: VM component, URI for matching

2012-05-08 Thread Thomas Johansen
Hi Claus, So what's the deal? This is certainly an incompatibility between 2.9.0 and 2.9.1/2.9.2? On 2.9.1/2.9.2 the producer and consumer don't communicate when having the option on the consumer and not on the producer. This makes upgrading Camel in my product from 2.9.0 to 2.9.2 difficult. Takk

Re: VM component, URI for matching

2012-05-08 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Yeah only the name of the queue ought to be enough. Its only on the consumer side the ?concurrentConsumers option matter. The only trick is though if you want the queue to have a fixed size, then its frankly the first endpoint created that dicate the queue size, eg if you use vm:foo?size=5000

VM component, URI for matching

2012-05-08 Thread Thomas Johansen
Hi, Camel 2.9.0 apparently does not require that URI parameters are part of the URI on both consumer and producer side of a VM queue, while 2.9.1 and 2.9.2 does. Is this by purpose or mistake? For example, I had a test which was using a ProducerTemplate to test a route: template().requestBody("v