Re: SEDA with Aggregation

2016-10-24 Thread Vince Iglehart
orked. If it ensures sequential calls to RouteB, then it will accomplish what I need. Regards -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/SEDA-with-Aggregation-tp5789103p5789186.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: SEDA with Aggregation

2016-10-21 Thread Brad Johnson
; from("seda:routeB").to(...) > > My understanding is that SEDA will block all incoming messages to RouteB > until the current message has been completed. Am I correct? Will this > design guarantee that only 1 "instance" of routeB will be running at a > time? &g

SEDA with Aggregation

2016-10-21 Thread Vince Iglehart
Am I correct? Will this design guarantee that only 1 "instance" of routeB will be running at a time? -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/SEDA-with-Aggregation-tp5789103.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.