I see that Camel mainly makes sense with a broker like ActiveMQ, as a core
for a scalable/decoupled system.
Thanks for helping me understanding this!
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/scalable-bus-with-multiple-Camel-instances-tp5606593p5612599.html
Sent from the
Thanks for your answer.
I'd like to have a response as fast as possible and can afford loosing
messages.
Actually I would like to see if I can avoid activemq in the middle.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/scalable-bus-with-multiple-Camel-instances-tp5606593p56
When running this program I get the message 'defaultEndpoint must be
specified'. Could you help me understand why?
Thank you!
public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception
{
// create CamelContext
CamelContext context = new DefaultCamelContext();
// add o
My idea is to use camel to decouple modules. In order to support scalability
and failover, I am wondering if the following architecture is adviced?
I have two applications with Camel embedded AppCamel1 and AppCamel2. Then I
have standalone camel nodes Camel1 and Camel2.
AppCamel1 would have a rou
I posted my question on stackoverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9704526/using-camel-as-a-fast-back-end-bus-with-rest-services
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9704526/using-camel-as-a-fast-back-end-bus-with-rest-services
Please let me know if it's not ok to proceed this way.
I beli