the -F option
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1913
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Claus Ibsen
> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I had a look and found a glitch. I have created a ticket to track it
>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1913
&
You should use POST to send data. GET is only for like query
> parameters and the body is expected to be empty using GET.
> As opposed to POST where the posted data is in the body.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:36 PM, jjb wrote:
>>
>> FYI, I us
FYI, I use the following wget command to test this:
wget --post-file=ftm_request.xml --output-document=-
http://localhost:8080/ftm/
Where the ftm_request.xml file has the following contents (which I want to
get as a String in my HttpProcessor.process method):
Regards
jjb wrote
ion. Is there another way to get the
HTTP body as a String or is this just broken in the latest SNAPSHOT (this
used to work in 2.0-M2)?
Regards
jjb wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> So I got the latest SNAPSHOT and the bean binding issue as well as the
> camel-http getResponse issue have bee
back from this.
Regards
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:40 AM, jjb wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have another question regarding how to obtain the body of the HTTP
>> message. Before the latest SNAPSHOT (in 2.0-M2), I used to be able to do
FYI -
The latest SNAPSHOT also doesn't contain the bean?method= fix either.
Regards
jjb wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have another question regarding how to obtain the body of the HTTP
> message. Before the latest SNAPSHOT (in 2.0-M2), I used to be able to do
> this:
>
body of an
HTTP post now?
Regards
jjb wrote:
>
> Hi, Claus.
>
> I was hoping to get the latest SNAPSHOT with the HttpMessage.getResponse
> method implemented. I just updated from the SNAPSHOT repo and verified
> it's not there yet:
>
> stealth: wget -
to the servlet response
>>
>> // and we can use servlet response to write to output stream
>> also
>> res.getOutputStream().print("Written by servlet response");
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Claus Ibsen
>&
response.getWriter().println(statusStr)
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Ah the response may be missing on the HttpMessage.
>
> What do you need it for?
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:51 AM, jjb wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Claus.
>>
>> Thank you so much fo
issue is that your base class implements the
> javax.jms.MessageListener.
> I will dig into why Camel prefers to invoke this method over the
> method name specified.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:02 PM, jjb wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Attached is an example which recreates th
Hi.
I need to do synchronous processing but not hold up routes of the same type
when many instances are active at the same time. Take the following bean
and route definitions from camel-context.xml:
...
http://0.0.0.0:8080/test/?sessionSupport=true"/>
And
t put the @Handler
annotation in the DerivedClass.
http://www.nabble.com/file/p24813432/camel_bug.tgz camel_bug.tgz
About the 2.0-M3 Camel interface for HttpServletResponse - how do I get it
from the Exchange?
Thanks!
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:26 AM, jjb wrot
the
HttpServletRequest worked for me - thanks)?
Regards
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:52 AM, jjb wrote:
>>
>> I have a hierarchy of objects which looks like this:
>>
>> public BaseClass implements javax.jms.MessageListe
I have a hierarchy of objects which looks like this:
public BaseClass implements javax.jms.MessageListener
{
public void onMessage(javax.jms.Message message)
{
// do something
}
}
public DerivedClass extends BaseClass
{
public void process(String body)
{
// do
14 matches
Mail list logo
