Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel K 2.6.0

+1 (binding) Regards JB On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 9:42 AM Pasquale Congiusti wrote: > > Hello, > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel K 2.6.0. This release contains a > bunch of new features [1] and aligns to the latest Camel Quarkus runtime > (3.15.2). The main feature is the availability of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel K 2.6.0

Hello, we need at least another binding vote in order to close this release. Thanks in advance to anybody willing to help! Cheers, Pasquale. On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 9:42 AM Pasquale Congiusti < pasquale.congiu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel K 2.6.0. This

Re: camel-jbang maven performance

Hi Okay I tested 4.10.1 and 4.11.0 and they run fast again Apache Camel 4.11.0-SNAPSHOT (idle) started in 104ms (build:0ms init:0ms start:104ms boot:741ms) On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 7:08 PM Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > Okay we found out the problem is google-cloud-bom that is crazy. > So we are f

Re: camel-jbang maven performance

Hi Okay we found out the problem is google-cloud-bom that is crazy. So we are fixing this to avoid importing this bom, and will be super fast again in 4.10.1 and onwards. On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 1:14 PM Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > I created a ticket > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel K 2.6.0

+1 (binding) Andrea Il giorno lun 17 feb 2025 alle ore 16:13 Zineb Bendhiba < bendhiba.zi...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks Pasquale ! > > Le lun. 10 févr. 2025 à 09:44, Pasquale Congiusti < > pasquale.congiu...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > Hello, > > > > This is a vote to releas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel K 2.6.0

+1 (binding) Thanks Pasquale ! Le lun. 10 févr. 2025 à 09:44, Pasquale Congiusti < pasquale.congiu...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hello, > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel K 2.6.0. This release contains a > bunch of new features [1] and aligns to the latest Camel Quarkus runtime > (3.15.2). T

Re: Handling exception in DIRECT sub-route and continue on the parent route

Hello Claus, Thank you for your response. Yes, I understood that the observed behaviour is by-design in Camel. Yet, as this does not fulfill our particular requirement, I wanted to know how to use Camel to behave differently. More specifically : we do need the firstRoute to continue the processi

Re: camel-jbang maven performance

Hi I created a ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-21750 On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 12:20 PM Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > I tracked the problem down to HUGE amount of transitive BOM dependencies > starting from com.google.cloud:libraries-bom:26.54.0 being bom-imported > from

Re: camel-jbang maven performance

Hello I tracked the problem down to HUGE amount of transitive BOM dependencies starting from com.google.cloud:libraries-bom:26.54.0 being bom-imported from camel-parent 4.10.0: com.google.cloud:libraries-bom:26.54.0 - com.google.protobuf:protobuf-bom:4.29.0 - com.google.cloud:first-party-depend

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Camel Kamelets 4.10.0

Hello all, The vote passes with the following result: 4 +1 binding votes: Andrea Cosentino, Zineb Bendhiba, Marat Gubaidullin and Claus Ibsen 3 +1 non-binding votes: Thomas Cunningham, Gaelle Fournier and Claudio Miranda I'll go ahead with the process. Thanks to all the voters.