On 11/17/10 12:29 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Kannan wrote:
Hi
I am convert the message body to given class type and save the object
into DB.if transaction failed the message will send to dead letter queue.
Now deadLetter queue will contain converted type messag
I don't think choice() works that way. choice() is for selecting a
single destination based on conditions; it does indeed stop at the
first match. If you want multiple when() clauses to be hit, you'll
need to give each one its own choice() end() wrapper.
What do you mean by multiple filters occu
This is essentially a different incantation of CAMEL-2436
(https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2436)
A test case that reproduces the issue is below.
If you have a bean that returns null when processing the body of a
JMSMessage you will not get the null in the next endpoint but rather
th
You are making things complicate.
Why don't you try to generate the spring DSL which is based on you
business logic and use less simple expressions ?
On 11/17/10 3:22 AM, Craig Taylor wrote:
In an effort to avoid having to recompile / deploy our application for every
customer / data iteration
You are deploying the application context into a OSGi container, it's
more complicate.
Currently camel will try to use the application context classloader to
load the jaxb context classes. So please make sure your spring
application context bundle imports the generated package, and the
genera
On 11/16/10 9:46 PM, serega wrote:
The fundamental question is how do I test my routes with mock endpoints on
both ends?
The following code works.
public class CamelTest extends CamelTestSupport {
@EndpointInject(uri = "mock:result")
protected MockEndpoint resultEndpoint;
@Pro
On 11/16/10 6:25 PM, Blair wrote:
ok, that does sound right, I have tried to convert it to inonly but that
didn't work well at all :)
How do I put the response back? I have been reading the documentation for
the last couple of days trying to work this particular problem out.
If the message ex
Hi,
Maybe you can attach a customer processor after the error handler, when
the route1 throws the exception, your customer processor can pause the
route2.
On 11/16/10 7:15 PM, alodde wrote:
Hello everybody,
Is there a way to influence the processing of camel route while runtime? I
like to
Hi Claus, Thanks for answering.
I have a route/flow that calls a specific OS command to retrieve some XML
(it's from a COBOL script). It is required to be called on it's own with a
single Client or with a list of Clients.
The main route (as per original post but with the response endpoint logic)
In an effort to avoid having to recompile / deploy our application for every
customer / data iteration I'm attempting to store the route within the
database and upon initialization, define the static routes represented
therein (simple() match expression and target).
I'm running into difficulty def
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Kannan wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am convert the message body to given class type and save the object
> into DB.if transaction failed the message will send to dead letter queue.
> Now deadLetter queue will contain converted type message or original message
> ?
By defau
Hi
You can also implement your custom PropertyResolver and set it on the
Properties component.
Then you can control how the properties is resolved.
But as Willem said, maybe the jasypt encryption stuff is something
that works for you.
Then you can use that out of the box.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:08 AM, damianharvey
wrote:
>
> I have a route that uses RecipientList to call "exec" (see
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4103499/apache-camel-exec-with-args) :
>
> from("seda:start")
> .log("*** Started single body : ${body}")
> .recipientList(simple("exec:GetCl
Hi,
thanks for your help. What I need is an example showing how to use the
ApplicationContextRegistry, i.e. how to configure password, keystore, etc.
in the context.xml.
kind regards
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/TCP-with-SSL-documentation-example-tp3260204
Hi
I am convert the message body to given class type and save the object
into DB.if transaction failed the message will send to dead letter queue.
Now deadLetter queue will contain converted type message or original message
?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.c
Hm..
But that kind of kills the possibility of using POJO producer/consumer,
doesn't it?
:/
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Cannot-reply-to-a-message-routed-more-than-once-by-Camel-tp3266433p3267329.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nab
Hi,
I hope somebody have solved this problem, as I can see there are number of
posting for the problem but no real and satisfactory common solution to the
problem.
Let me discuss my issue:
I have created jaxb bean as :
In my routeBuilder.java Class, I have create route as :
fro
The fundamental question is how do I test my routes with mock endpoints on
both ends?
The following code works.
public class CamelTest extends CamelTestSupport {
@EndpointInject(uri = "mock:result")
protected MockEndpoint resultEndpoint;
@Produce(uri = "direct:start")
protected
Hi,
Looks like you are using template.sendBodyAndHeaders(...) which is meant to
send one way requests (InOnly). You need to use
template.requestBodyAndHeaders(...) if you want a response back. You can get
back the modified exchange in this case.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Ashwin...
-
--
Hi,
Yes it is possible to influence the running of a route from another route.
You can do this with a processor.
The code would involve
a> Getting a reference to the camel context.
b> Getting and identifying the correct route from a list of route
definitions
c> Performing th
Hello everybody,
Is there a way to influence the processing of camel route while runtime? I
like to process two routes in parallel. Under special circumstances in route
1 (route 1 detected a problem), route 2 should be interrupted (if possible
by throwing an exception).
Thanks for your help,
An
ok, that does sound right, I have tried to convert it to inonly but that
didn't work well at all :)
How do I put the response back? I have been reading the documentation for
the last couple of days trying to work this particular problem out.
I'm looking for a good example - if you have one then
The question is maybe more general.
Is it possible to associate a transaction with more then two threads?
As multicast is able to process to operations (to) in parallel, for each
operation (to) an own thread need to be started. Which results in the
problem that one transaction context has to be
23 matches
Mail list logo
