Hi
Your problem is that you defined a route as
onException(Exception.class)
.handled(true)
.useOriginalBody()
.maximumRedeliveries(2)
.to("mock:error");
from("activemq:broken")
Hi,
I think you need to ask the configuration question on ActiveMQ mailing
list.
As camel-jms nothing about about the underlay MQ's protocol. it can't be
configured from camel :(
Willem
Ming Fang wrote:
Does anyone know of a fix for this?
This is a critical problem for us, and for many I w
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Ming Fang wrote:
> Does anyone know of a fix for this?
> This is a critical problem for us, and for many I would think since this is a
> very typical configuration.
>
Have you asked /searched at the AMQ forum also?
Try creating a small application that demonstra
Does anyone know of a fix for this?
This is a critical problem for us, and for many I would think since this is a
very typical configuration.
On Nov 19, 2009, at 6:59 AM, Ming Fang wrote:
> Yes changing idelTimeOut in org.apache.activemq.pool.ConnectionPool to a very
> large number would be a
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Martin Krasser wrote:
> ... not part of the Camel 2.0.0 Javadocs ...
>
Ah my bad. I missed your obvious statement about using 2.0.0. And the
new markRollbackOnly() was added in 2.1. And hence its of course not
mentioned in the javadoc.
Sorry for sounding rudy or
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 AM, sub3 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have the dead letter channel set up to catch errors:
> errorHandler(deadLetterChannel("bean:DeadLetterChannelProcessor?method=handleError").maximumRedeliveries(1));
>
> I am getting the incoming object that is causing the error, but I woul
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:29 PM, mantay wrote:
>
> I am looking for a simple method to define (in Spring XML) a route which is
> deployed but disabled at startup time. Something like this:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I don't see a way how to do that. Actually, it should be possible because in
> the we
Hi,
I have the dead letter channel set up to catch errors:
errorHandler(deadLetterChannel("bean:DeadLetterChannelProcessor?method=handleError").maximumRedeliveries(1));
I am getting the incoming object that is causing the error, but I would also
like to get the error/exception this is thrown. I
I have a transacted route and onException clause that tells Camel to use
original body on redelivery.
If I modify body somewhere in the route, I am expecting to still receive
original body on redelivery.
That works fine if I do something like setBody(constant("xyz")), but if
I use setBody(bean("
Hi,
Looks like there is something wrong with your route. There is no consumer
established on the queue (i.e (consumer count is zero)...
This can be a problem if there is no message expiry set and you each the
memory and persistence limits set for the broker at broker start-up. You
will max out t
I am looking for a simple method to define (in Spring XML) a route which is
deployed but disabled at startup time. Something like this:
I don't see a way how to do that. Actually, it should be possible because in
the web console one may stop and restart a route already.
What is the
Hi,
You could do the following
from("timer://foo?period=360").
process (new Processor(Exchange exchange) {
exchange.getOut().setBody("My FooBar Message");
}).
to(activemq:MyQueue);
from
Hi,
You could do the following
from("timer://foo?period=360").
process (new Processor(Exchange exchange) {
exchange.getOut().setBody("My FooBar Message");
}).
to(activemq:MyQueue);
from
Sorry for my example, just see "Timer based polling consumer" paragraph on
http://camel.apache.org/polling-consumer.html.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Dmitry Ulanov wrote:
> new Thread(new Runnable() {
> @Override public void run() {
>
new Thread(new Runnable() {
@Override public void run() {
try {
PollingConsumer consumer =
getContext().getEndpoint("activemq:queue1").createPollingConsumer();
Producer pr
May be it's a bug. If you stop camel via JMX, after restart queue
subscriptions aren't restored. Clause, do you know anything about it?
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:31 PM, titexe wrote:
>
> the problem, when i look of the attributes of this queue, i found
> ConsumerCount 0 and the route of camel is
Hello,
there's a possibility to schedule a move of messages from one queue to
another, every 1 hour?
If yes, how;)? Thank you for giving me an example:)
Thank you in advance
titexe
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Camel-%3A-schedule-the-move-of-messages-tp26443376p26443
the problem, when i look of the attributes of this queue, i found
ConsumerCount 0 and the route of camel is started.
What can you explain this ?
Thank you in advance,
titexe
dulanov wrote:
>
> Do you just write to db or read/write? May be the problem would be solved
> by
> creating indexes f
Hi,
Thanks Ibsen, it worked.
Anto
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Anto Paul
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >As an example take an FTP poller that has to connect to a server when
> a
> > particular event is triggered. We have to provide a UI
Great
Thank you
S. Ali Tokmen
savas-ali.tok...@bull.net
Office: +33 4 76 29 76 19
GSM:+33 66 43 00 555
Bull, Architect of an Open World TM
http://www.bull.com
Charles Moulliard a écrit :
http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/2009/11/apache-camel-21-update-on-releaseplan.html
Charles Moulliard
http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/2009/11/apache-camel-21-update-on-releaseplan.html
Charles Moulliard
Senior Enterprise Architect
Apache Camel Committer
*
blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:44 PM, S. Ali Tokmen
wrote:
> Hello
>
> Are there any plans for Camel 2.1 milestone and/or candidate releases?
>
See more here
http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/2009/11/apache-camel-21-update-on-releaseplan.html
> Cheers
>
> --
>
> S. Ali Tokmen
> savas-ali.tok...@bull.net
Hello
Are there any plans for Camel 2.1 milestone and/or candidate releases?
Cheers
--
S. Ali Tokmen
savas-ali.tok...@bull.net
Office: +33 4 76 29 76 19
GSM:+33 66 43 00 555
Bull, Architect of an Open World TM
http://www.bull.com
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:34 PM, trivedi kumar b
wrote:
>
> If I add markRollbackOnly() to this router instead of rollback(), I am
> getting another error (Transaction exception):
>
> "Transaction rolled back because it has been marked as rollback-only"
Camel does not set this message so its som
If I add markRollbackOnly() to this router instead of rollback(), I am
getting another error (Transaction exception):
"Transaction rolled back because it has been marked as rollback-only"
Any idea why this error is coming?
Thanks,
Trivedi
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:4
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Martin Krasser wrote:
> Using
>
> setProperty(Exchange.ROLLBACK_ONLY, Boolean.TRUE)
>
> isn't enough for 2.0.0. This causes the TransactionErrorHandler in this
> version to throw an exception too. In 2-1.SNAPSHOT everything works as
> expected because of additiona
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:01 AM, hanuman wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I tired to run the following camel configuration:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This option allowMultipleConsumers is @deprecated and removed in Camel 2.1
So use direct without that option.
> My "OutQueue" is receiving two messages.
> If i
Using
setProperty(Exchange.ROLLBACK_ONLY, Boolean.TRUE)
isn't enough for 2.0.0. This causes the TransactionErrorHandler in this
version to throw an exception too. In 2-1.SNAPSHOT everything works as
expected because of additional logic added to the TransactionErrorHandler.
For getting it run
Hi,
I tired to run the following camel configuration:
My "OutQueue" is receiving two messages.
If i set "allowMultipleConsumers=false" to Direct endpoint.Now i got only
one message to OutQueue.
Can you please tell me, whats the difference between them.
Thanks in advance,
Satyam
--
View
... not part of the Camel 2.0.0 Javadocs ...
Claus Ibsen schrieb:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Martin Krasser wrote:
I know that when I don't declare the local exception handler a rollback will
occur. But how can I handle the
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Martin Krasser
>> wrote:
>>> I know that when I don't declare the local exception handler a rollback will
>>> occur. But how can I handle the exceptio
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Martin Krasser
> wrote:
>> I know that when I don't declare the local exception handler a rollback will
>> occur. But how can I handle the exception for returning a custom response to
>> the sender AND rollb
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Martin Krasser wrote:
> I know that when I don't declare the local exception handler a rollback will
> occur. But how can I handle the exception for returning a custom response to
> the sender AND rollback the transaction? Maybe I'm missing something obvious
> (?)
I know that when I don't declare the local exception handler a rollback
will occur. But how can I handle the exception for returning a custom
response to the sender AND rollback the transaction? Maybe I'm missing
something obvious (?).
Claus Ibsen schrieb:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Ma
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Martin Krasser wrote:
> I'm using the TransactionErrorHandler of Camel 2.0.0 and observe an
> unexpected transaction-outcome for handled errors. Using the
> TransactionErrorHandler with the route
>
> onException(Exception.class).handled(true).process(...);
> from(
I'm using the TransactionErrorHandler of Camel 2.0.0 and observe an
unexpected transaction-outcome for handled errors. Using the
TransactionErrorHandler with the route
onException(Exception.class).handled(true).process(...);
from("direct:test").transacted().processRef('myFailureProcessor');
do
36 matches
Mail list logo
