On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Allen Lau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using the File2 component with Spring DSL.
>
> Can not seem to find a good way to externalize the options of the File2
> component that take an "int" like
> initialDelay and delay.
>
> For example, the following will fail.
>
> uri="
I got it.
Thanks ,Ashwin!
Ashwin Karpe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is not a bug. The way your DSL has been written seems to desire this
> effect of dropping messages on both queues.
>
> If yo need to move from "jms:in" to "jms:out2" without leaving any
> messages on "jms:out1" then you need to wri
Hi,
I am using the File2 component with Spring DSL.
Can not seem to find a good way to externalize the options of the File2
component that take an "int" like
initialDelay and delay.
For example, the following will fail.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Allen
Hi Claus,
Yes, this is my first attempt at getting camel-http working with https. Can
you verify if this should work in Camel 1.4.0? Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-HTTPS-authentication-setup-using-camel-http-tp26190394p26306184.html
Sent from the Camel - Us
Do interceptors work with transactions ?
If I have transacted turned on, messages don't seem to be re-routed to
the interceptor.
--
Dragisa Krsmanovic
Java Developer
Public Library of Science
http://www.plos.org
---
Hi
The aggregator in Camel does not yet support persistence.
Its on the roadmap for Camel 2.2.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Dragisa Krsmanovic
wrote:
> I want to do something like this:
>
> from("activemq:start)
> .transacted()
> .aggregate(new PMCAggregationStrategy())
> .constant(tr
I want to do something like this:
from("activemq:start)
.transacted()
.aggregate(new PMCAggregationStrategy())
.constant(true) // aggregate everything into one message
.completionPredicate(header(FINISH_AGGREGATION).isEqualTo(true))
.to("mock:end");
Since aggregation can take long
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:59 PM, DRy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>>
>> I have committed a fix now. Can you test it on your end?
>> svn rev: 834801.
>>
>
> I will test this as soon as possible ...
>
> We do not use the maven repo. How can I see if this svn rev is in the daily
> snapsh
Hi,
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> I have committed a fix now. Can you test it on your end?
> svn rev: 834801.
>
I will test this as soon as possible ...
We do not use the maven repo. How can I see if this svn rev is in the daily
snapshot build ... ?
Your message is dated "Nov 11, 2009; 09:33am"
Hi,
Just wondered if anyone had read the below?
Thanks
jpcook wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I ended up solving this problem with the follow configure method:
>
> private void configureNewsTrackerByTeamHtml() throws Exception {
>
> for(String url : urls){
Hi,
This is not a bug. The way your DSL has been written seems to desire this
effect of dropping messages on both queues.
If yo need to move from "jms:in" to "jms:out2" without leaving any messages
on "jms:out1" then you need to write your DSL as
from("jms:in").to("jms:out1");
from(jm
hi,i write a DSL route,like this :
from("jms:in").to("jms:out1").to("jms:out2");
Then,i send two messages to the queue "in" with activemq5.2,and i receive
two messages at queue "out1",and two messages at queue "out2".
These messages are:
in "out1":
ActiveMQTextMessage {commandId = 7, responseRequ
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:15 AM, DRy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>>
>> I had a look and created a ticket to improve/fix this issue
>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2158
>>
>> The current code did stop to eagerly instead of finding better
>> candidates longer up the
13 matches
Mail list logo
