Re: Camel CXF Component with ActiveMQ

2009-04-04 Thread Willem Jiang
Hi, If you are using Multicast, please keep in mind the default aggregation strategy is using the latest exchange. So you need put the bean endpoint as the last one to endpoint like this.

Re: camel-velocity: empty variable

2009-04-04 Thread Matteo Redaelli
Ok, now it works. Thank you for your help even if it was a issue related to velocity and not camel -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/camel-velocity%3A-empty-variable-tp22864380p22887665.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Camel CXF Component with ActiveMQ

2009-04-04 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 6:21 PM, ychawla wrote: > > Thanks Claus (again), > Just a few notes here. > > I was suspecting it was the MEP.  I kept trying to use syntax like this, > however it was not working: > > > I did some additional searches on the forums and it seems like users where > having pr

Re: Camel CXF Component with ActiveMQ

2009-04-04 Thread ychawla
Thanks Claus (again), Just a few notes here. I was suspecting it was the MEP. I kept trying to use syntax like this, however it was not working: I did some additional searches on the forums and it seems like users where having problems with the syntax above. However the syntax you suggested

Re: thoughts on the method names for the requestBody and requestBodyAndHeader etc

2009-04-04 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Ryan Gardner wrote: > The requestBody method makes sense (it requests a body) - but > "requestBodyAndHeader" and "requestBodyAndHeaders" etc methods make less > sense - because I'm only requesting one thing (the body). > > maybe "requestBodyWithHeader" makes more se