Queue/Message Fairness as oppose to Client Fairness

I have 1 broker, 1 consumer, many queues. the queues are arbitrary such as ACCOUNT_ID.1 ACCOUNT_ID.2 etc. I'm trying to avoid 1 account flooding its queue and starving the other accounts. If the queues look like this (items in array are the messages) ACCOUNT_ID.1 = [ 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d ] ACCOUNT_ID.2

Re: Queue/Message Fairness as oppose to Client Fairness

> Connect at CamelOne <http://camelone.com/> May 24-26 > > The Open Source Integration Conference > > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:55 AM, kapitalx <[hidden > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3425012&i=0&by-user=t>> > wrote: >

Re: Queue/Message Fairness as oppose to Client Fairness

Garry, Thanks for the suggestion. With the change, the broker continues to dispatch everything from Queue 1 before moving onto Queue 2. Just much slower. I still need the dispatching to alternate between queues for every message. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.