Hello everyone
We are running AMQ 5.14 embedded mode under JBoss 7 with Java 7, 100%
persistent messaging supported by JournalledJDCBPersistence to an Oracle 12
DB. Durable topic subscription processing is our focus.
Our activmq-broker.xml looks like this:
http://www.springframework.org/schema
Hi Tim, do you mean improper handling by our consumer code or improper
handling by ActiveMQ when selectors don't match?
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
I missed the word "our" in your response which I now take to mean ActiveMQ
potential mishandling.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Tim, we appreciate any and all help the community can offer and we'll do what
we can to help ourselves.
You are correct in that a repeat of the test with only DC1 results in the
same behaviour and outcome. Pending messages for DC1 are lost/deleted after
messages arrive on the same topic but whi
Tim, thanks for getting backwill do as you suggested and report back
soon.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Hi Tim, we managed to attach a debugger as requested and the path you
identified does seem to be the one taken by the incorrect update to
ACTIVEMQ_ACKS table in respect of DC1. We took several stack dumps (text
below) at the different debug points you requested in case that also helps.
Note that
Hi, I have a customer running AMQ 5.10.0, JDBC persistence and no journalling
like the OP. We saw the same query as the OP last week..also during a
restart of the JBoss app server running AMQ embedded. Oracle AWR reports
showed this SQL was executed 14,000 times in 1 hour, effectively grindi
Hi Tim, in case you missed it, or in case I'm missing something..but
doesn't my stack trace confirm Oracle driver selection by the
oracle.jdbc.driver packages?
Cheers
Jason.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Got it. I'll try it today.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Nathan, I do have access to Oracle in dev/test so might be able to help with
your line of enquiry if you want to share some further thoughts and/or you
think it might expedite. Cheers all and thanks for sharing. We really
appreciate the work of all the good people in this community.
--
Sent fr
I couldn't see the limitQuery() support in the DefaultJDBCAdapter of AMQ5.10,
but it did arrive in AMQ5.13. Our system is currently on 5.10 so we
upgraded a test system to 5.13.4. I updated the jdbcPersistenceAdapter
element to look like this...
..
11 matches
Mail list logo