+ActiveMQ
Whilst it was a very informative and excellently presented article, I
noticed that its a couple of years old now (last edited Dec 2007), does
anyone know if this is still an accurate representation of the state of
things in ActiveMQ 5.6?
Thanks,
Dusty
--
View this message in context
Cheers Bruce, thanks for confirming that its still valid.
Regards,
Dusty
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Threading-Model-tp4657445p4657464.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
