that
currently handles "(client)->A" message.
We have load tests that highlight this issue. And polling consumer was a
workaround until we figured out the reconnect implications.
I'll try to rework my example into unit test and then file a jira as you
suggested.
Thanks,
Pavel
O
Submitted https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2612 & attached test
case.
Thanks,
Pavel
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Pavel wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> prefetch=1 alone would not work for my case;
>
> We build CXF web services with JMS transport on top of ActiveMQ.
Sounds scary to me, as system I'm working on uses activemq extensively, and
is not production-proven yet.
Do you have/can you build a junit test case that reproduces the issue under
5.3? If so, that looks like a good start for Jira defect.
Disclaimer - I'm not an AMQ committer.
Tha
61616) will
Give it a try; and I for one cannot imagine a good/valid reason not to use
failover transport.
Thanks,
Pavel
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:55 PM, ActiveUser wrote:
>
> Currently we are not but have considered that. Our messaging layer will
> also
> try reconnect.
>
> On
thing do not exhibit such problem.
Any ideas what could be happening? And why SingleConnectionFactory would
make a difference?
And also, is there a known negative impact from using
SingleConnectionFactory with CXF/ACtiveMQ?
Thanks,
Pavel
Hi,
We are experiencing issue described in this ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2250
We installed Artemis 2.11 but that doesn't help in our case.
Does somebody have similar issues? What's the cure?
*Pavel Molchanov*
? The connection is reading 1.6G. Is it too
much?
Pavel
Hi,
We are using 2.11 version.
We are passing around 20 messages/second.
Large messages are usually XML files and images.
Some images are very big, up to 120Mb.
*Pavel Molchanov*
Director of Software Development
InfoDesk
www.infodesk.com
1 Bridge Street | Suite 105 | Irvington | New York
Hi,
Seems that I have sent a reply with my full credentials :)
I am authorized to ask these questions in this group. Please ignore
the disclaimer for this specific issue.
Pavel
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 2:33 PM Pavel Molchanov <
pavel.molcha...@infodesk.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We
unsibsribe
.org/contact/#mailing
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:23 PM Pavel Molchanov <
> pavel.molcha...@infodesk.com> wrote:
>
> > unsibsribe
> >
>
g.spi.SpringTransactionPolicy">
I write my camel route i following way
Problem
When process() method of my bean is called xa transaction was not open.
I expect that Pavel
Hello, per my experience ActiveMQ puts incoming emails into particular
consumers "queues" on round robin basis. I.e. having 50 consumers for one
ActiveMQ queue, every 50th email is sent to one particular consumer,
regardless the responses received from the customers.
My question is: is it possibl
Hello, has somebody met stalled persistent emails in ActiveMQ 5.3.2?
Something like AMQ-2009? As that should be fixed in ActiveMQ 5.3 while we
see that in 5.3.2. In our case, ActiveMQ receives emails from James server,
puts them into a queue where there are 50 consumers all with prefetch set to
1.
Hello,
we experience the following problem when using Active-MQ 5.3.2 for
forwarding persistent messages.
Time to time, consumers don't read mails from Active-MQ sufficiently fast so
memory utilisation reaches 70%. Further mails are stored on disk and storage
utilisation is growing. Once consumer
I don't think so. See attached activemq.xml file.
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> Is the advice from https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2834
> relevant to your use case?
>
> On 23 July 2010 15:32, Pavel Moravec wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> we experience the
It is in my previous post at the botton. Or use direct link
http://old.nabble.com/file/p29264165/activemq.xml
Pavel
Reynald Borer wrote:
>
> I think you forgot to attach your activemq.xml file... or I am totally
> blind ?
>
> On 07/26/2010 10:08 AM, Pavel Moravec wrote:
>
Hello.
I try configure ActiveMQ to sending and receiving SMS via camel-smpp plugin.
I using the simulator provided by Logica as SMSC for testing.
Messages is delivering successfully when SMSC is running, but when SMSC is
down (for example, network is down) messages is dequeued automati
Thank you. I try to do this.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/SMPP-messages-persistent-delivering.-tp29333107p29335970.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello,
I identified the source of problems but don't understand why the
configuration causes them. When I comment out:
(or simply set producerFlowControl to false), then the problems disappear.
Can't be there some problem with the producer flow control?
Pavel
Pavel Moravec wrot
Hi.
I have following problem.
Is it possible to have Topic with following behaviour:
1) Topic should contain persistent messages
2) *Any *consumer of topic should recieve all messages from that topic. It's
like Retroactive consumer, but retroactive consumer has one limitation, it
should be conn
21 matches
Mail list logo