Hello,
I check activemq.log for messages like these to determine if activemq has
corrupt data files:
[kxn2@amq-a02 scheduler]$ sudo grep "Failed to start job scheduler store"
/opt/local/activemq/data/activemq.log | head -1
2022-06-03 16:00:46,670 | ERROR | Failed to start job scheduler store:
I am preparing artemis 2.23.0 at the moment...
The way a release works in apache, you send it for vote and it will be
officially released after 72 hours of a passing vote. but you should
have a candidate release today that you can try it out. Based on the
current diffs it should be fairly safe for
A snapshot [1] is always a possibility as well.
Justin
[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/2.23.0-SNAPSHOT/
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:34 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I am preparing artemis 2.23.0 at the moment...
>
> The way a rel
right, but since I'm just releasing it would be great to hear his
feedback on top of the release candidate itself.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 12:38 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> A snapshot [1] is always a possibility as well.
>
>
> Justin
>
> [1]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/sn
Broker
Name localhost
Version 5.16.0
ID ID:x-36082-1654522010467-0:1
Uptime 1 day 3 hours
Store percent used 0
Memory percent used 0
Temp percent used 0
Out of necessity I have a single consumer of a queue (work needs to be
completed serially), but I need to have some messages processed b
The release candidate :
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.23.0
I would appreciate your feedback here or even better on the dev list at the
voting thread.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 12:52 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> right, but since I'm just releasing it would be g
Can you paste the consumer code as well? Is the consumer running while the
messages are being sent or do you send all the messages and then start the
consumer?
Justin
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 12:11 PM Richard Bergmann
wrote:
> Broker
> Name localhost
> Version 5.16.0
> ID ID:x-36082-1654
@Ben Warrick: BTW When I said "you are likely" hitting the bug, I was
just using polite words...
I am 100% sure you are hitting that condition by creating one session
per message. You should definitely look to upgrade or cherry-pick the
fix to your own branch.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 3:14 PM Cleb
@Clebert: Thanks for finding this. Here is some more evidence for you. This
is only one monkey on my back right now, but I do plan on upgrading. I'll
get you some feedback for sure. If I can manage, I want to try reproducing
this in a lower environment.
[image: image.png]
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 5
the image.png you sent could not be delivered by the infra for some reason.
It's rare an occasion where I affirm I am 100% sure about something. I
usually always keep a margin for the changing my opinion, or just being
wrong.. But on this case I am 1% sure you will hit the bug I fixed.
The i
10 matches
Mail list logo
