Re: jaasAuthenticationPlugin ans sslContext in karaf

Hi all, Anybody have an idea? -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: Re-ordering of messages - Artemis

I have managed to sort out the dependency conflict problem. Actually both camel-spring and activemq-camel come with jaxb. So I just made sure they both use the same version of jaxb. e.g. by using activemq-camel-5.15.1 and camel-spring-2.20.1 where they both use jaxb-2.2.11. -- Sent from: http://

Re: jaasAuthenticationPlugin ans sslContext in karaf

So are you trying to have cert-based authentication for AMQP and password-based authentication for OpenWire? Or are you trying to have cert-based authentication for AMQP and no authentication for OpenWire? Also, can you please post the error messages you get both with and without the plugin enable

Re: Re-ordering of messages - Artemis

There really shouldn't be any reason to use the activemq-camel dependency. Here's an example pom.xml that I've used to build a web-app with a Camel context: http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; xmlns:xsi=" http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:schemaLocation=" http://maven.apache.org/POM

Re: jaasAuthenticationPlugin ans sslContext in karaf

You right I try to have cert-based authentication for AMQP and password-based authentication for OpenWire Here my logs (DEBUG) just before a connection I would like to clarify that without the plugin jaasAuthenticationPlugin, it's works for a ssl connection. Like, if I put the pulgin, the sslconte

Re: [DISCUSS] Confusion surrounding the ActiveMQ project roadmap

At this point, I am fairly open to ideas on the path forward. And I agree with above statements that the PMC decides, but that it's best to have this discussion in a transparent/open manner (i.e. on a public discussion board like this one). Jeff makes a good point about adoption. Another thought

Lost messages.

Hello, We're experiencing a problem with our ActiveMQ queue. We have a producer (Cloud solution) which sends messages to an ActiveMQ queue. Our issue is the following: Erratically some of the messages are not delivered to the ActiveMQ queue and are lost. We checked the producer's log and it sh

Re: [DISCUSS] Confusion surrounding the ActiveMQ project roadmap

> Another thought - having both brokers long term seems redundant as there is > a huge amount of overlap, and I believe the intent (please correct me if > this is wrong) is eventually to have Artemis superset all of the *key* > functionality from AMQ 5.x. I think all the features are covered at th

Messages lost.

Hello, We're experiencing a problem with our ActiveMQ queue. We have a producer (Cloud solution) which sends messages to an ActiveMQ queue. Our issue is the following: Erratically some of the messages are not delivered to the ActiveMQ queue and are lost. We checked the producer's log and it sho

Re: Messages lost.

I see 5 dequeued messages in that screenshot, not zero. What am I missing? Can you share a screenshot of your queie's row from the Queues page of the web console? Better, can you share a screenshot of the properties screen of the JMX MBean corresponding to the queue as seen in a JMX viewer such as

Re: Lost messages.

Hi Is the producer use sendAsync() or send() ? Are the messages persistent ? Regards JB On Nov 21, 2017, 22:38, at 22:38, dfco21 wrote: >Hello, > >We're experiencing a problem with our ActiveMQ queue. We have a >producer >(Cloud solution) which sends messages to an ActiveMQ queue. > >Our issue