Re: redelivery plugin not working… doing something wrong?

you are keeping the connection and consumer open, so the message remain inflight from the brokers perspective. you need to peek at the activemq unit tests to get a handle on redelivery. https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/fad1dd0f1727af8ce6e0d05a51c32cc63f658e24/activemq-unit-tests/src/test/j

Re: Setting up REST with HTTPS

I asked the question in a much detailed/precise form, with everything I tried so far: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24958431/activemq-self-signed-certificate-causes-errors Any help is appreciated! Kind regards -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Settin

Re: redelivery plugin not working… doing something wrong?

I'll take a look now… I realized that my message actually DOES get redelivered, if I add the close() … BUT … it's instantly redelivered, with no timeout. On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Gary Tully wrote: > you are keeping the connection and consumer open, so the message > remain inflight from

Failover Delay

My ActiveMQ setup is 2 brokers using kahadb on a shared ntfs file system. The URI I am using for a .NET client connections is: , failover:(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://host2:61616)?transport.randomize=false Everything works fine when connecting to host1, but when host2 is the active broker there is a

Re: Failover Delay

On 07/25/2014 12:02 PM, anow789 wrote: My ActiveMQ setup is 2 brokers using kahadb on a shared ntfs file system. The URI I am using for a .NET client connections is: , failover:(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://host2:61616)?transport.randomize=false Everything works fine when connecting to host1, but whe

Failover delay

My ActiveMQ setup is 2 brokers using kahadb on a shared ntfs file system. The URI I am using for a .NET client connections is: , failover:(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://host2:61616)?transport.randomize=false Everything works fine when connecting to host1, but when host2 is the active broker there is a

mq-create problems in fabric fuse

I am working with fuse fabric and create my broker Master-Slave with mq-create, doubt is that the containers that generates me each containing their own queues, when the Master fails and the Slave takes that role queued messages that were not completed processing in the queues of the first containe

How to handle users

Hi, Sorry this may be a silly question, I'm new to ActiveMQ and reading ActiveMQ in action but I don't understand with a desktop application with multiple different users connecting to a broker how you can provide the same messaging functionality but unique to each user. For example, a system whe

Re: Basic cluster question

You are not using a shared SAN? You are doing replication amongst the brokers? How are you achieving the replication? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Basic-cluster-question-tp4683299p4683681.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nab

Re: hawtio dashboard not appearing in activemq5.9.1

I installed the Hawtio chrome plugin. I'm able to access the following URL running AMQ 5.9.1: http://localhost:8161/api/jolokia This is what is rendered in chrome: {"timestamp":1406323273,"status":200,"request":{"type":"version"},"value":{"protocol":"7.0","agent":"1.1.5","info":{"product":"jett

evaluating clustering options for AMQ 5.9.1

Hi I am doing some R&D regarding clustering for AMQ 5.9.1. We are looking to evaluate active/active options as well as active/passive options. Master/slave pattern seems to be popular for failover. I've looked at the following blogs: http://bsnyderblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-to-use-automati

Re: evaluating clustering options for AMQ 5.9.1

How would I go about setting up a Shared File System Master Slave POC? Is there any tutorial on this? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/evaluating-clustering-options-for-AMQ-5-9-1-tp4683683p4683684.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at

JMS Bridge vs Camel

I have a JMS Bridge set up between to ActiveMQ (5.10) Queues. We are running into an issue with the Bridge dropping the connections. I have been digging around to find a fix, and I keep running into use Camel Routes. Besides the 3 reasons listed here: http://activemq.apache.org/jms-to-jms-bri

Re: evaluating clustering options for AMQ 5.9.1

Hi There is also the ActiveMQ books that covers clustering http://activemq.apache.org/books On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:33 PM, asookazian wrote: > Hi I am doing some R&D regarding clustering for AMQ 5.9.1. We are looking to > evaluate active/active options as well as active/passive options. > Ma