Re: Questions about Networks of brokers and fail-over scenarios

2012-03-15 Thread Torsten Mielke
On Mar 15, 2012, at 1:30 AM, pollotek wrote: > Thank you both for the quick responses, they were very useful and quick. > > I just have one more detail to ask about. In the case where broker1 has no > consumers and broker2 has consumers, the messages are forwarded > automatically to broker2. If

Re: Questions about Networks of brokers and fail-over scenarios

2012-03-15 Thread Torsten Mielke
Also see the paragraph "When to use and not use Conduit subscriptions" on http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html On Mar 15, 2012, at 10:02 AM, Torsten Mielke wrote: > > On Mar 15, 2012, at 1:30 AM, pollotek wrote: > >> Thank you both for the quick responses, they were very useful

Ordering of messages with a network of brokers ...

2012-03-15 Thread Greg Thomas
I note at http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-preserve-order-of-messages.html that is says "ActiveMQ will preserve the order of messages sent by a single producer to all consumers on a topic". However, at http://activemq.apache.org/clustering.html it says: The problem with running lots of stand a