Hi Matt,
When you say that the message is not being dequeued, do you mean from the
queue on the broker?
The overall scheme itself seems to be pretty complicated; where are the
topic messages coming from?
If you are trying to ensure that messages for a particular id are consumed
in sequence then
Hi Jakub,
Yes, from the queue on the broker. As far as the broker is concerned, it
remains "in-flight" permanently. What's weirder is when I run a standalone
java client to consume the messages, it has no trouble whatsoever. So I
think there's something going on in the client side that's causing m
I am using 5.5.1.
I don't really understand how this can be happening. Any advice would be
appreciated:
ConsumerCount: 1
CursorFull: false
CursorMemoryUsage: 375818264
CursorPercentUsage: 70
DequeueCount: 0
DispatchCount: 20803
EnqueueCount: 20807
ExpiredCount: 0
InFlightCount: 20803
...
QueueSi
john,
I have been using connections like between two sets of master/slave brokers
that are networked together. This generally works but I am working on
tracking down some occasional failures of my tests that seem related to the
network never getting set up (not sure about that though -- it is a
Ok, after poking around a bit, I realized that there must be persisted
messages being restored from a previous execution. Does that make sense?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/how-can-jmx-queueSize-be-greater-than-enqueue-size-tp4414406p4414654.html
Sent fr
Looking at the code, it looks like I have to be able to set the
AcceptInvalidBrokerCert on the SslTransportFactory, but I can't seem to
find a way to get access to that unless I create my own factory and url
scheme. This seems a little severe to me. Is there something that I'm
missing?
Chris
On T
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 14:53 -0700, Chris Robison wrote:
> Looking at the code, it looks like I have to be able to set the
> AcceptInvalidBrokerCert on the SslTransportFactory, but I can't seem to
> find a way to get access to that unless I create my own factory and url
> scheme. This seems a littl
Thank you! That worked swimmingly!
chris
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Timothy Bish wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 14:53 -0700, Chris Robison wrote:
> > Looking at the code, it looks like I have to be able to set the
> > AcceptInvalidBrokerCert on the SslTransportFactory, but I can't seem to
Enqueued and dequeued are counters for the number of total messages that
have traveled through the system over time. QueueSize is the current count.
On 2/23/12 1:00 PM, mserrano wrote:
Ok, after poking around a bit, I realized that there must be persisted
messages being restored from a previou
Hi,
Is it possible to use the failover construct in the networkConnectors uri?
I have tried the following two uri values and both prevented ActiveMQ from
starting with an exception.
Both returned the following stack trace:
ERROR: java.lang.RuntimeException: Faile
version 5.5.1
broker cfg: memory: 256M, Store:10g, Swap/tmp:10g, persistence=true,
producerFlowControl=true
I'm using the http://activemq.apache.org/message-cursors.html
fileQueueCursor destination policy for a queue. It appears to properly
page in messages in the cursor without blocking when
I'm using:
Note, no // after the static. But it looks like something else is
misconfigured for you. Notice the /start/ after no scheme specified.
hodgesz wrote
>
> ERROR: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failed to execute start task. Reason:
> java.l
> ng.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid broke
Thanks for your reply! I noticed I had the trailing ')' in the incorrect
spot based on your example. It is working now.
The start issue was getting my Windows and Linux environments confused and
typing 'activemq start' in Windows.
-Jonathan
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.
I'm seeing a weird issue in an AMQ installation.
basically I can see with TCP dump that a JMS message gets published to
ActiveMQ, but if that message is a particular type of message, ActiveMQ
doesn't forward that on to it's (STOMP) subscribers.
AMQ version: 5.5.1
Setup:
Glassfish v3.1.1, conne
OH - here's an example of what gets printed to the logs when it works
and the message that seems to break it
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-goes-in-sometimes-STOMP-comes-out-but-not-always-tp4416098p4416114.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailin
The message broker used in my application has the failover protocol used over
2 brokers.
While creating the consumer, I need to know on which broker the actual
consumer was formed. i.e I want to fetch at runtime the the current master
IP/Hostname
While debugging, I saw that the QueueConnection obje
16 matches
Mail list logo