Re: Problems with acknowledge mode order (STOMP)

I'm experiencing the same issue, both on ActiveMQ 4.1.1 and 5.2.0. Two questions: 1) It seems like broker is accepting the ACK and erroneously replying with the ERROR message. Is that correct? 2) Is this a bug and an intentional design to disallow STOMP clients from handle messages concurrently?

Re: Problems with acknowledge mode order (STOMP)

Sorry, for question #2, I mean "Is this a bug or an intentional design?" On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Roger Hoover wrote: > I'm experiencing the same issue, both on ActiveMQ 4.1.1 and 5.2.0. > > Two questions: > 1) It seems like broker is accepting the ACK and erroneously replying with > the

Re: Transacted Messages Not Committed

Hi Frank, do you think you can produce a test case for the behavior you describe. Thanks, Gary. 2009/1/22 frank_at_zynga : > > Hi, > > We're just starting to phase in the use of AMQ 5.2.0 in a high volume > environment and I've run into some strange behavior with transacted > sessions. The basic

Re: Performance in relation to queue size

Hello, I changed my AMQPersistenceAdapter to write 1 GB files (total store size is 30GB) After that I created messages during the whole night into the queue. The result looks l

Re: Unable to start Active MQ Broker without LAN Connection.

Your information helped me. Thank you. Sailaja. bsnyder wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:29 AM, sailaja p wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am begginer to the Active MQ and trying understand the features of >> Active >> MQ. I have downloaded the Active MQ 5.1.0. When I tried to start the >> Messa

Re: Performance in relation to queue size

> Well, the main question is now: > 1. Why is the queue getting slower when there are a lot of messages inside? So with X million messages, enqueue times are 4-7 seconds? This is probabally because the hashIndex is limited, I think you need to make the indexMaxBinSize quite large and use the same v

Re: Securing active MQ

Ok i set the broker name..and commented out the network connect line. However I still get "unknown host exception" .. the host name in the error is the domain name of the server but AMQ must be getting that information over the other "public" interface ..which i have not used in the config . Is

Re: Adding property before being sent to dead letter queue

bsnyder wrote: > > Trying to do custom message processing inside of ActiveMQ is by no > means easy to achieve. Camel is definitely the better solution for > this type of work. > We are seeking a solution to this as well. I will be looking at Camel down the road , but right now I have two ques

Re: ActiveMQ - XPATH Selectors - Unable to make it work

Hi, this selector is fine (just tested it). I guess the problem is in the virtual topics. Are you sure you are consuming for the right place? Do you receive a message if you don't have selector? Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://

Re: Problems with acknowledge mode order (STOMP)

It shouldn't behave that way. Can you create a test case to simulate this behavior? Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Roger Hoover wrote:

Re: Securing active MQ

I also tried adding " ?useLocalHost=true " to the Transport connector as follows which also fails, AMQ still gets the machine domain name from the public interface and then tries to resolve that name on the private network interface. Is this bug or is there something i am missing .? It se

Re: ActiveMQ - XPATH Selectors - Unable to make it work

- Yes, I am consuming from the physical queue of the virtual topic to which I am publishing. - I receive all the messages from the same physical queue if I don't use any selectors. Please find attached the test class (TestXPathSelectors.java) for reference. Jagath Dejan Bosanac wrote: > > Hi,

Re: Securing active MQ

I have scrapped the uri addition . I tried changing the broker name property and the useLocalHostBrokerName to false. However the problem is unchanged AMQ still gets the machine DNS name from the public interface and then complains that it is unable to resolve the public DNS name on the privat

Re: Problems with acknowledge mode order (STOMP)

Hi Dejan, Thanks for the reply. Do you need it in a particular language? I could easily create a test case in Perl for it. Roger On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote: > It shouldn't behave that way. Can you create a test case to simulate this > behavior? > > Cheers > -- > Dej

Re: Transacted Messages Not Committed

Hi Gary, I was able to create a test case and reproduce this behavior on a consistent basis. The source code is attached and is actually nearly identical to the code we're using in production. While running through some test scenarios I was able to discover some additional information: - The p

Re: Transacted Messages Not Committed

Hmmm, one of the files didn't get uploaded. Let me try again... http://www.nabble.com/file/p21632866/TestCase.java TestCase.java frank_at_zynga wrote: > > Hi Gary, > > I was able to create a test case and reproduce this behavior on a > consistent basis. The source code is attached and is act