Network broker - huge connection consumption

Hi there, I have a question concerning the best practice in the setup of a broker network with Oracle and ActiveMQ. I am actually facing a case where during consumption of messages, the number of connection open by the brokers to the database, is huge, and eventually will block the listener from

How can I find messages that have been unconsumed for "too long"?

Is there a way, either with filters or timeouts on queues, to get my hands on any messages that have been sitting in the queue for "too long"? My situtation/plan is to have a queue with multiple consumers. Each consumer will be using a selector to decide which messages to consume. Under ideal c

Re: How can I find messages that have been unconsumed for "too long"?

AFAIK the expired message will be moved into the DeadLetterQueue. Since you're able to configure the DLQ it should be possible to do what you want (using AMQ5). There's an open issue with expired message not being processed until someone tries to consume them (The bug was AMQ-1112 I think). So sinc

Re: How can I find messages that have been unconsumed for "too long"?

That was my first expectation - that they would go to the DLQ but they never appeared to go there. Perhaps the bug you mention is the reason. Having found this behaviour I went and did some searching - the outcome was that it sounded like brokers were expected to destroy the expired messages. I

ActiveMQ 5.0 Release Date?

Hi All, When is the ActiveMQ 5.0 stable version is expected to release. Thanks and Regards, Gokulal.K -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5.0-Release-Date--tf4353522s2354.html#a12405041 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

ActiveMQ Tries to resolve ip adresses to names which failes when only a proxy should do that

Hi, We have been having cases recently were people cannnot connect to our ActiveMQ (4.1) when using proxies. After lots of digging, i have found that the issue may be in this class: org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport and especially in the connect() method. There we call remoteAddress.

Authorization/Security Question

I'm having trouble getting my head around some of ActiveMQs authorization settings. I have a relatively specific use case I'm trying to meet, but can't quite figure out what the appropriate permission settings are. The read and write permissions I understand. The admin and temporary destination pe

Re: Authorization/Security Question

Another fly in the ointment is how should the Advisory destinations be permissioned for the client group? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Authorization-Security-Question-tf4354381s2354.html#a12407602 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: How can I find messages that have been unconsumed for "too long"?

If all else fails, you can perhaps use a QueueBrowser to monitor the messages on the queue. ttmdev DominicTulley wrote: > > That was my first expectation - that they would go to the DLQ but they > never appeared to go there. Perhaps the bug you mention is the reason. > Having found this beh

Re: How can I find messages that have been unconsumed for "too long"?

Possibly you could just create consumers where effectively (not real code): sendTime < now() - 10min and just create a new consumer, receive until there's nothing left, then try again a minute later. you'd be able to yank from one queue and re-publish to another. I'd bet you could do this with c