The hang could just mean that the broker is down/hung/busy? Its
basically just waiting for the broker to respond. Do you see anything
in the broker log?
On 2/13/07, Jack Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When creating a new connection, I am sometimes seeing a hang in
setClientID when it tries
Which version are you using? Also what appears in the broker's log
file - it seems the broker side is not responding properly
On 2/14/07, David Borja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi activemq devs!!
I'm having a problem with activemq and log4j ...
this is my log4j.properties :
log4j.appender.A1=
On 2/14/07, J. Matthew Pryor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are using SSL to allow clients and servers to connect together
with Lingo doing the actual RPC mechanism on top of ActiveMQ (no
persistent store).
I have read http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-use-ssl.html and this
is fine is all the c
On 2/13/07, Sandeep Chayapathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I was testing the Java interface to ActiveMQ. Im interested in the
static transport mechanism, specifically, I have a master/slave setup and I
want my code to connect to the master always and on failure, switch to using
Hi,
i have observed strange behaviour. I use activemq4.1 with mule1.3.3. the
first message stays always on queue!!! if i change the value of
queuePrefetch to zero then it will be consumed. is it expected behaviour?
thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/queu
On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
i have observed strange behaviour. I use activemq4.1 with mule1.3.3. the
first message stays always on queue!!! if i change the value of
queuePrefetch to zero then it will be consumed. is it expected behaviour?
No. Is this with a prefetch
yes. with prefetch of 1 the first message stays always on queue after
startup! blocked consumer? how can i see blocked consumers with JMX?
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i have observed strange behaviour. I use activemq4.1 with mule1
On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yes. with prefetch of 1 the first message stays always on queue after
startup! blocked consumer? how can i see blocked consumers with JMX?
Use JConsole to look at the active subscribers & their status. Try
killing them to release the block.
htt
thx for help. another question... what means actually queuePrefetch of 0?
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> yes. with prefetch of 1 the first message stays always on queue after
>> startup! blocked consumer? how can i see blocked consumers with J
i have checked the status of subscribers. all consumers have active state!
what is downside of queuePrefetch of 0?
yolcuabbas
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> yes. with prefetch of 1 the first message stays always on queue after
>> startup! bloc
On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thx for help. another question... what means actually queuePrefetch of 0?
Its the slowest possible way of consuming messages; basically no
message is sent to a client until it pulls it from the broker via a
consumer.receive() call.
http://activ
There has been discussion regarding FileMessage or something similar: a
message for transferring large amounts of data.
For background, see:
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1075
We need something that offers better service than streaming, of course
by building on top of it. That
Hi James ...
The version of active mq is the latest (apache-activemq-4.1.0-incubator),
and the activemq log seems normal (i think so ...):
2007-02-14 09:09:16,306 [main ] INFO
BrokerService - ActiveMQ 4.1.0-incubator JMS Message Broker
(localhost) is starting
2007-02-
Hello Active MQ Users ,
I am getting the following exceptions , when active MQ
channel is not used for a period of time.As a result of it , the socket
for connection is getting closed.
Feb 14, 2007 10:37:28 AM org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection
onAsyncException
WARNING: Async
Folks,
I've been trying to use the tempDestinationAuthorizationEntry feature in 4.2
and I think I've found a problem. If I set up a consumer of the temp queue
and add it to the read permission, it always reports that I don't have
permission to read the queue. However, if I add that consumer to th
Thanks James.
In this particular case, the first problem I was trying to solve was
simply allowing a Lingo client to relax/control the TLS/SSL
certificate acceptance criteria.
Using the ssl:// transport, the SslTransportFactory that ships with
ActiveMQ simply returns the default SSLContext w
Good catch Lorne!
Added a patch for this issue on the svn trunk r507792.
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1163
Regards,
Jonas
Lorne Wilson wrote:
Folks,
I've been trying to use the tempDestinationAuthorizationEntry feature in 4.2
and I think I've found a problem. If I set up a
Hello All,
Is this the forum to ask How-To questons with regards to deploying
ActiveMQ in a given topology? I'm new to ActiveMQ and could use a bit of
advice. If this kind of question should be posted elsewhere, my apologies,
please point me there.
My topology
--
In a nutshell, I h
Hello ActiveMQ devs,
I don't want to seem picky :( but 1 week has passed and still no feedback on
this TCP_NODELAY issue.
Finding that "wireFormat.tcpNoDelayEnabled" does not work but
"socket.tcpNoDelay" DOES work even if it is not documented, already helped 1
person... see the last comment of H
19 matches
Mail list logo
